From: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>
To: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 3/5] mm/page_alloc: stop instantly reusing freed page
Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2016 10:28:17 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20161014012817.GC4993@js1304-P5Q-DELUXE> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <44132140-c678-73a2-b747-f04ad0f3d7df@suse.cz>
On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 12:59:14PM +0200, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
> On 10/13/2016 10:08 AM, js1304@gmail.com wrote:
> >From: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>
> >
> >Allocation/free pattern is usually sequantial. If they are freed to
> >the buddy list, they can be coalesced. However, we first keep these freed
> >pages at the pcp list and try to reuse them until threshold is reached
> >so we don't have enough chance to get a high order freepage. This reusing
> >would provide us some performance advantages since we don't need to
> >get the zone lock and we don't pay the cost to check buddy merging.
> >But, less fragmentation and more high order freepage would compensate
> >this overhead in other ways. First, we would trigger less direct
> >compaction which has high overhead. And, there are usecases that uses
> >high order page to boost their performance.
> >
> >Instantly resuing freed page seems to provide us computational benefit
> >but the other affects more precious things like as I/O performance and
> >memory consumption so I think that it's a good idea to weight
> >later advantage more.
>
> Again, there's also cache hotness to consider. And whether the
> sequential pattern is still real on a system with higher uptime.
> Should be possible to evaluate with tracepoints?
I answered this in previous e-mail. Anyway, we should evaluate
cache-effect. tracepoint or perf's cache event would show some
evidence. I will do it soon and report again.
Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-10-14 1:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-10-13 8:08 [RFC PATCH 0/5] Reduce fragmentation js1304
2016-10-13 8:08 ` [RFC PATCH 1/5] mm/page_alloc: always add freeing page at the tail of the buddy list js1304
2016-10-13 9:04 ` Vlastimil Babka
2016-10-14 1:01 ` Joonsoo Kim
2016-10-17 9:21 ` Xishi Qiu
2016-10-26 4:37 ` Joonsoo Kim
2016-10-26 5:50 ` Xishi Qiu
2016-10-26 5:59 ` Joonsoo Kim
2016-10-26 6:08 ` Xishi Qiu
2016-10-13 8:08 ` [RFC PATCH 2/5] mm/page_alloc: use smallest fallback page first in movable allocation js1304
2016-10-13 9:12 ` Vlastimil Babka
2016-10-14 1:26 ` Joonsoo Kim
2016-10-14 10:52 ` Vlastimil Babka
2016-10-26 4:41 ` Joonsoo Kim
2016-10-13 8:08 ` [RFC PATCH 3/5] mm/page_alloc: stop instantly reusing freed page js1304
2016-10-13 10:59 ` Vlastimil Babka
2016-10-14 1:28 ` Joonsoo Kim [this message]
2016-10-13 8:08 ` [RFC PATCH 4/5] mm/page_alloc: add fixed migratetype pageblock infrastructure js1304
2016-10-13 8:08 ` [RFC PATCH 5/5] mm/page_alloc: support fixed migratetype pageblock js1304
2016-10-13 11:05 ` Vlastimil Babka
2016-10-14 1:58 ` Joonsoo Kim
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20161014012817.GC4993@js1304-P5Q-DELUXE \
--to=iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mgorman@techsingularity.net \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).