Re: [PATCH v2] mm: vmalloc: Replace purge_lock spinlock with atomic refcount

[Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>]

On Sat, 15 Oct 2016 03:42:42 -0700
Joel Fernandes <joelaf@google.com> wrote:

> The purge_lock spinlock causes high latencies with non RT kernel. This has been
> reported multiple times on lkml [1] [2] and affects applications like audio.
> 
> In this patch, I replace the spinlock with an atomic refcount so that
> preemption is kept turned on during purge. This Ok to do since [3] builds the
> lazy free list in advance and atomically retrieves the list so any instance of
> purge will have its own list it is purging. Since the individual vmap area
> frees are themselves protected by a lock, this is Ok.

This is a good idea, and good results, but that's not what the spinlock was
for -- it was for enforcing the sync semantics.

Going this route, you'll have to audit callers to expect changed behavior
and change documentation of sync parameter.

I suspect a better approach would be to instead use a mutex for this, and
require that all sync=1 callers be able to sleep. I would say that most
probably already can.

Thanks,
Nick

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>