From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-pf0-f199.google.com (mail-pf0-f199.google.com [209.85.192.199]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94C766B02CC for ; Thu, 3 Nov 2016 17:16:51 -0400 (EDT) Received: by mail-pf0-f199.google.com with SMTP id 17so14966223pfy.2 for ; Thu, 03 Nov 2016 14:16:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ipmail06.adl6.internode.on.net (ipmail06.adl6.internode.on.net. [150.101.137.145]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id 89si11621215pfl.229.2016.11.03.14.16.49 for ; Thu, 03 Nov 2016 14:16:50 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 4 Nov 2016 08:16:46 +1100 From: Dave Chinner Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 00/16] re-enable DAX PMD support Message-ID: <20161103211646.GB28177@dastard> References: <1478030058-1422-1-git-send-email-ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com> <20161103015826.GI9920@dastard> <20161103175102.GA11784@linux.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20161103175102.GA11784@linux.intel.com> Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: Ross Zwisler , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Theodore Ts'o , Alexander Viro , Andreas Dilger , Andrew Morton , Christoph Hellwig , Dan Williams , Jan Kara , Matthew Wilcox , linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Nov 03, 2016 at 11:51:02AM -0600, Ross Zwisler wrote: > On Thu, Nov 03, 2016 at 12:58:26PM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 01, 2016 at 01:54:02PM -0600, Ross Zwisler wrote: > > > DAX PMDs have been disabled since Jan Kara introduced DAX radix tree based > > > locking. This series allows DAX PMDs to participate in the DAX radix tree > > > based locking scheme so that they can be re-enabled. > > > > I've seen patch 0/16 - where did you send the other 16? I need to > > pick up the bug fix that is in this patch set... > > I CC'd your "david@fromorbit.com" address on the entire set, as well as all > the usual lists (linux-xfs, linux-fsdevel, linux-nvdimm, etc). Ok, now I'm /really/ confused. Procmail logs show: