Re: vmalloced stacks and scatterwalk_map_and_copy()

[Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>]

On Thu, Nov 03, 2016 at 08:57:49PM -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> 
> The crypto request objects can live on the stack just fine.  It's the
> request buffers that need to live elsewhere (or the alternative
> interfaces can be used, or the crypto core code can start using
> something other than scatterlists).
> 

There are cases where a crypto operation is done on a buffer embedded in a
request object.  The example I'm aware of is in the GCM implementation
(crypto/gcm.c).  Basically it needs to encrypt 16 zero bytes prepended with the
actual data, so it fills a buffer in the request object
(crypto_gcm_req_priv_ctx.auth_tag) with zeroes and builds a new scatterlist
which covers both this buffer and the original data scatterlist.

Granted, GCM provides the aead interface not the skcipher interface, and
currently there is no AEAD_REQUEST_ON_STACK() macro like there is a
SKCIPHER_REQUEST_ON_STACK() macro.  So maybe no one is creating aead requests on
the stack right now.  But it's something to watch out for.

Eric

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>