From: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com>
To: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>,
Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>,
linux-mm@kvack.org,
Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/page_alloc: Wait for oom_lock before retrying.
Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2016 10:06:51 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20161213010651.GB415@jagdpanzerIV.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20161212114903.GM3506@pathway.suse.cz>
On (12/12/16 12:49), Petr Mladek wrote:
[..]
> > OK, I see. This is not a new problem though and people are trying to
> > solve it in the printk proper. CCed some people, I do not have links
> > to those threads handy. And if this is really the problem here then we
> > definitely shouldn't put hacks into the page allocator path to handle
> > it because there might be other sources of the printk flood might be
> > arbitrary.
>
> Yup, this is exactly the type of the problem that we want to solve
> by the async printk.
yes, I think async printk will help here.
> > > The introduction of uncontrolled
> > >
> > > warn_alloc(gfp_mask, "page allocation stalls for %ums, order:%u", ...);
>
> I am just curious that there would be so many messages.
> If I get it correctly, this warning is printed
> once every 10 second. Or am I wrong?
>
> Well, you might want to consider using
>
> stall_timeout *= 2;
>
> instead of adding the constant 10 * HZ.
>
> Of course, a better would be some global throttling of
> this message.
yeah. rate limiting is still a good thing to have.
somewhat unrelated, but somehow related. just some thoughts.
with async printk, in some cases, I suspect (and I haven't thought
of it long enought), messages rate limiting can have an even bigger,
to some extent, necessity than with the current printk. the thing
is that in current scheme CPU that does printk-s can *sometimes*
go to console_unlock() and spins there printing the messages that
it appended to the logbuf. which naturally throttles that CPU and
it can't execte more printk-s for awhile. with async printk that
CPU is detached from console_unlock() printing loop, so the CPU is
free to append new messages to the logbuf as fast as it wants to.
it should not cause any lockups or something, but we can lost some
messages.
-ss
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-12-13 1:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 74+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-12-06 10:33 [PATCH] mm/page_alloc: Wait for oom_lock before retrying Tetsuo Handa
2016-12-07 8:15 ` Michal Hocko
2016-12-07 15:29 ` Tetsuo Handa
2016-12-08 8:20 ` Vlastimil Babka
2016-12-08 11:00 ` Tetsuo Handa
2016-12-08 13:32 ` Michal Hocko
2016-12-08 16:18 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2016-12-08 13:27 ` Michal Hocko
2016-12-09 14:23 ` Tetsuo Handa
2016-12-09 14:46 ` Michal Hocko
2016-12-10 11:24 ` Tetsuo Handa
2016-12-12 9:07 ` Michal Hocko
2016-12-12 11:49 ` Petr Mladek
2016-12-12 13:00 ` Michal Hocko
2016-12-12 14:05 ` Tetsuo Handa
2016-12-13 1:06 ` Sergey Senozhatsky [this message]
2016-12-12 12:12 ` Tetsuo Handa
2016-12-12 12:55 ` Michal Hocko
2016-12-12 13:19 ` Michal Hocko
2016-12-13 12:06 ` Tetsuo Handa
2016-12-13 17:06 ` Michal Hocko
2016-12-14 11:37 ` Tetsuo Handa
2016-12-14 12:42 ` Michal Hocko
2016-12-14 16:36 ` Tetsuo Handa
2016-12-14 18:18 ` Michal Hocko
2016-12-15 10:21 ` Tetsuo Handa
2016-12-19 11:25 ` Tetsuo Handa
2016-12-19 12:27 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2016-12-20 15:39 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2016-12-22 10:27 ` Tetsuo Handa
2016-12-22 10:53 ` Petr Mladek
2016-12-22 13:40 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2016-12-22 13:33 ` Tetsuo Handa
2016-12-22 19:24 ` Michal Hocko
2016-12-24 6:25 ` Tetsuo Handa
2016-12-26 11:49 ` Michal Hocko
2016-12-27 10:39 ` Tetsuo Handa
2016-12-27 10:57 ` Michal Hocko
2016-12-22 13:42 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2016-12-22 14:01 ` Tetsuo Handa
2016-12-22 14:09 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2016-12-22 14:30 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2016-12-26 10:54 ` Tetsuo Handa
2016-12-26 11:34 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2017-01-12 13:10 ` Petr Mladek
2017-01-13 2:52 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2017-01-13 3:53 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2017-01-13 11:15 ` Petr Mladek
2017-01-13 11:14 ` Petr Mladek
2017-01-12 14:18 ` Petr Mladek
2017-01-13 2:28 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2017-01-13 11:03 ` Petr Mladek
2017-01-13 11:50 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2017-01-13 12:15 ` Petr Mladek
2016-12-26 11:41 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2017-01-13 14:03 ` Petr Mladek
2016-12-15 1:11 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2016-12-15 6:35 ` Michal Hocko
2016-12-15 10:16 ` Petr Mladek
2016-12-14 9:37 ` Petr Mladek
2016-12-14 10:20 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2016-12-14 11:01 ` Petr Mladek
2016-12-14 12:23 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2016-12-14 12:47 ` Petr Mladek
2016-12-14 10:26 ` Michal Hocko
2016-12-15 7:34 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2016-12-14 11:37 ` Tetsuo Handa
2016-12-14 12:36 ` Petr Mladek
2016-12-14 12:44 ` Michal Hocko
2016-12-14 13:36 ` Tetsuo Handa
2016-12-14 13:52 ` Michal Hocko
2016-12-14 12:50 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2016-12-12 14:59 ` Tetsuo Handa
2016-12-12 15:55 ` Michal Hocko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20161213010651.GB415@jagdpanzerIV.localdomain \
--to=sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp \
--cc=pmladek@suse.com \
--cc=sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).