From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wm0-f71.google.com (mail-wm0-f71.google.com [74.125.82.71]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5BF86B03F4 for ; Thu, 22 Dec 2016 03:17:17 -0500 (EST) Received: by mail-wm0-f71.google.com with SMTP id m203so34586360wma.2 for ; Thu, 22 Dec 2016 00:17:17 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-wm0-x241.google.com (mail-wm0-x241.google.com. [2a00:1450:400c:c09::241]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id p144si27226947wme.14.2016.12.22.00.17.16 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 22 Dec 2016 00:17:16 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-wm0-x241.google.com with SMTP id u144so34673684wmu.0 for ; Thu, 22 Dec 2016 00:17:16 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2016 11:17:13 +0300 From: "Kirill A. Shutemov" Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: pmd dirty emulation in page fault handler Message-ID: <20161222081713.GA32480@node.shutemov.name> References: <1482364101-16204-1-git-send-email-minchan@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1482364101-16204-1-git-send-email-minchan@kernel.org> Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: Minchan Kim Cc: Andrew Morton , linux-mm@kvack.org, Jason Evans , "Kirill A . Shutemov" , Will Deacon , Catalin Marinas , linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, "[4.5+]" , Andreas Schwab On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 08:48:21AM +0900, Minchan Kim wrote: > Andreas reported [1] made a test in jemalloc hang in THP mode in arm64. I guess you wanted put b8d3c4c3009d before [1], right? > http://lkml.kernel.org/r/mvmmvfy37g1.fsf@hawking.suse.de > > The problem is page fault handler supports only accessed flag emulation > for THP page of SW-dirty/accessed architecture. > > This patch enables dirty-bit emulation for those architectures. > Without it, MADV_FREE makes application hang by repeated fault forever. > > [1] mm/huge_memory.c: don't split THP page when MADV_FREE syscall is called > > Cc: Jason Evans > Cc: Kirill A. Shutemov > Cc: Will Deacon > Cc: Catalin Marinas > Cc: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org > Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org > Cc: [4.5+] > Fixes: b8d3c4c3009d ("mm/huge_memory.c: don't split THP page when MADV_FREE syscall is called") > Reported-by: Andreas Schwab > Signed-off-by: Minchan Kim > --- > mm/huge_memory.c | 6 ++++-- > mm/memory.c | 18 ++++++++++-------- > 2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/mm/huge_memory.c b/mm/huge_memory.c > index 10eedbf..29ec8a4 100644 > --- a/mm/huge_memory.c > +++ b/mm/huge_memory.c > @@ -883,15 +883,17 @@ void huge_pmd_set_accessed(struct vm_fault *vmf, pmd_t orig_pmd) > { > pmd_t entry; > unsigned long haddr; > + bool write = vmf->flags & FAULT_FLAG_WRITE; > > vmf->ptl = pmd_lock(vmf->vma->vm_mm, vmf->pmd); > if (unlikely(!pmd_same(*vmf->pmd, orig_pmd))) > goto unlock; > > entry = pmd_mkyoung(orig_pmd); > + if (write) > + entry = pmd_mkdirty(entry); > haddr = vmf->address & HPAGE_PMD_MASK; > - if (pmdp_set_access_flags(vmf->vma, haddr, vmf->pmd, entry, > - vmf->flags & FAULT_FLAG_WRITE)) > + if (pmdp_set_access_flags(vmf->vma, haddr, vmf->pmd, entry, write)) > update_mmu_cache_pmd(vmf->vma, vmf->address, vmf->pmd); > > unlock: > diff --git a/mm/memory.c b/mm/memory.c > index 36c774f..7408ddc 100644 > --- a/mm/memory.c > +++ b/mm/memory.c > @@ -3637,18 +3637,20 @@ static int __handle_mm_fault(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long address, > if (pmd_protnone(orig_pmd) && vma_is_accessible(vma)) > return do_huge_pmd_numa_page(&vmf, orig_pmd); > > - if ((vmf.flags & FAULT_FLAG_WRITE) && > - !pmd_write(orig_pmd)) { > - ret = wp_huge_pmd(&vmf, orig_pmd); > - if (!(ret & VM_FAULT_FALLBACK)) > + if (vmf.flags & FAULT_FLAG_WRITE) { > + if (!pmd_write(orig_pmd)) { > + ret = wp_huge_pmd(&vmf, orig_pmd); > + if (ret == VM_FAULT_FALLBACK) In theory, more than one flag can be set and it would lead to false-negative. Bit check was the right thing. And I don't understand why do you need to change code in __handle_mm_fault() at all. >>From what I see change to huge_pmd_set_accessed() should be enough. > + goto pte_fault; > return ret; > - } else { > - huge_pmd_set_accessed(&vmf, orig_pmd); > - return 0; > + } > } > + > + huge_pmd_set_accessed(&vmf, orig_pmd); > + return 0; > } > } > - > +pte_fault: > return handle_pte_fault(&vmf); > } > > -- > 2.7.4 > > -- > To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in > the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, > see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . > Don't email: email@kvack.org -- Kirill A. Shutemov -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org