linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@lge.com>
To: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	mingo@kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de, walken@google.com,
	kirill@shutemov.name, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com,
	akpm@linux-foundation.org, npiggin@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 07/15] lockdep: Implement crossrelease feature
Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2017 16:43:47 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170117074346.GH3326@X58A-UD3R> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170117062408.GE15084@tardis.cn.ibm.com>

On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 02:24:08PM +0800, Boqun Feng wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 11:33:41AM +0900, Byungchul Park wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 04:13:19PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > > On Fri, Dec 09, 2016 at 02:12:03PM +0900, Byungchul Park wrote:
> > > > +	/*
> > > > +	 * We assign class_idx here redundantly even though following
> > > > +	 * memcpy will cover it, in order to ensure a rcu reader can
> > > > +	 * access the class_idx atomically without lock.
> > > > +	 *
> > > > +	 * Here we assume setting a word-sized variable is atomic.
> > > 
> > > which one, where?
> > 
> > I meant xlock_class(xlock) in check_add_plock().
> > 
> > I was not sure about the following two.
> > 
> > 1. Is it ordered between following a and b?
> >    a. memcpy -> list_add_tail_rcu
> >    b. list_for_each_entry_rcu -> load class_idx (xlock_class)
> >    I assumed that it's not ordered.
> > 2. Does memcpy guarantee atomic store for each word?
> >    I assumed that it doesn't.
> > 
> > But I think I was wrong.. The first might be ordered. I will remove
> > the following redundant statement. It'd be orderd, right?
> > 
> 
> Yes, a and b are ordered, IOW, they could be paired, meaning when we
> got the item in a list_for_each_entry_rcu() loop, all memory operations
> before the corresponding list_add_tail_rcu() should be observed by us.

Thank you for confirming it.

> 
> Regards,
> Boqun
> 
> > > 
> > > > +	 */
> > > > +	xlock->hlock.class_idx = hlock->class_idx;
> > > > +	gen_id = (unsigned int)atomic_inc_return(&cross_gen_id);
> > > > +	WRITE_ONCE(xlock->gen_id, gen_id);
> > > > +	memcpy(&xlock->hlock, hlock, sizeof(struct held_lock));
> > > > +	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&xlock->xlock_entry);
> > > > +	list_add_tail_rcu(&xlock->xlock_entry, &xlocks_head);
> > > 


--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2017-01-17  7:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 51+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-12-09  5:11 [PATCH v4 00/15] lockdep: Implement crossrelease feature Byungchul Park
2016-12-09  5:11 ` [PATCH v4 01/15] x86/dumpstack: Optimize save_stack_trace Byungchul Park
2016-12-09  5:11 ` [PATCH v4 02/15] x86/dumpstack: Add save_stack_trace()_fast() Byungchul Park
2016-12-09  5:11 ` [PATCH v4 03/15] lockdep: Refactor lookup_chain_cache() Byungchul Park
2016-12-09  5:12 ` [PATCH v4 04/15] lockdep: Add a function building a chain between two classes Byungchul Park
2017-01-10 21:00   ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-01-12  1:41     ` Byungchul Park
2016-12-09  5:12 ` [PATCH v4 05/15] lockdep: Make check_prev_add can use a separate stack_trace Byungchul Park
2017-01-12 16:16   ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-01-13  2:45     ` Byungchul Park
2017-01-13 10:11     ` Byungchul Park
2017-01-17 15:54       ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-01-18  2:04         ` Byungchul Park
2017-01-18 15:10           ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-01-19  2:47             ` Byungchul Park
2016-12-09  5:12 ` [PATCH v4 06/15] lockdep: Make save_trace can skip stack tracing of the current Byungchul Park
2017-01-12 16:37   ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-01-13  0:18     ` Byungchul Park
2016-12-09  5:12 ` [PATCH v4 07/15] lockdep: Implement crossrelease feature Byungchul Park
2017-01-13  4:39   ` Lai Jiangshan
2017-01-13  5:02     ` Byungchul Park
2017-01-16 15:10   ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-01-17  2:05     ` Byungchul Park
2017-01-17  7:12       ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-01-17  7:49         ` Byungchul Park
2017-01-17  7:14       ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-01-17  7:45         ` Byungchul Park
2017-01-16 15:13   ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-01-17  2:33     ` Byungchul Park
2017-01-17  6:24       ` Boqun Feng
2017-01-17  7:43         ` Byungchul Park [this message]
2016-12-09  5:12 ` [PATCH v4 08/15] lockdep: Make crossrelease use save_stack_trace_fast() Byungchul Park
2016-12-09  5:12 ` [PATCH v4 09/15] lockdep: Make print_circular_bug() crosslock-aware Byungchul Park
2016-12-09  5:12 ` [PATCH v4 10/15] lockdep: Apply crossrelease to completion operation Byungchul Park
2016-12-09  5:12 ` [PATCH v4 11/15] pagemap.h: Remove trailing white space Byungchul Park
2016-12-09  5:12 ` [PATCH v4 12/15] lockdep: Apply crossrelease to PG_locked lock Byungchul Park
2016-12-09  5:12 ` [PATCH v4 13/15] lockdep: Apply lock_acquire(release) on __Set(__Clear)PageLocked Byungchul Park
2016-12-09  5:12 ` [PATCH v4 14/15] lockdep: Move data used in CONFIG_LOCKDEP_PAGELOCK from page to page_ext Byungchul Park
2016-12-09  5:12 ` [PATCH v4 15/15] lockdep: Crossrelease feature documentation Byungchul Park
2017-01-10 20:08   ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-01-11  1:29     ` Byungchul Park
2017-01-18  6:42   ` Boqun Feng
2017-01-18 10:53     ` Byungchul Park
2017-01-18 11:03       ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-01-18 11:54         ` Byungchul Park
2017-01-18 12:07           ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-01-18 12:14             ` byungchul.park
2017-01-18 14:12               ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-01-19  1:54                 ` Byungchul Park
2017-01-18 12:49             ` byungchul.park
2016-12-09  5:21 ` [FYI] Output of 'cat /proc/lockdep' after applying crossrelease Byungchul Park

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170117074346.GH3326@X58A-UD3R \
    --to=byungchul.park@lge.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
    --cc=iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com \
    --cc=kirill@shutemov.name \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=walken@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).