From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-qt0-f199.google.com (mail-qt0-f199.google.com [209.85.216.199]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 497D96B0033 for ; Mon, 23 Jan 2017 01:35:36 -0500 (EST) Received: by mail-qt0-f199.google.com with SMTP id a29so95580835qtb.6 for ; Sun, 22 Jan 2017 22:35:36 -0800 (PST) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org. [65.50.211.133]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id n23si10129522qtc.296.2017.01.22.22.35.35 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sun, 22 Jan 2017 22:35:35 -0800 (PST) Date: Sun, 22 Jan 2017 22:35:28 -0800 From: Matthew Wilcox Subject: Re: [ATTEND] many topics Message-ID: <20170123063528.GC12833@bombadil.infradead.org> References: <20170118133243.GB7021@dhcp22.suse.cz> <20170119110513.GA22816@bombadil.infradead.org> <20170119113317.GO30786@dhcp22.suse.cz> <20170119115243.GB22816@bombadil.infradead.org> <20170119121135.GR30786@dhcp22.suse.cz> <878tq5ff0i.fsf@notabene.neil.brown.name> <20170121131644.zupuk44p5jyzu5c5@thunk.org> <87ziijem9e.fsf@notabene.neil.brown.name> <20170123060544.GA12833@bombadil.infradead.org> <877f5me19s.fsf@notabene.neil.brown.name> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <877f5me19s.fsf@notabene.neil.brown.name> Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: NeilBrown Cc: Theodore Ts'o , Michal Hocko , lsf-pc@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 05:30:39PM +1100, NeilBrown wrote: > On Mon, Jan 23 2017, Matthew Wilcox wrote: > > ... can it even wait for *another* TEMPORARY allocation? I really think > > this discussion needs to take place in a room with more people present > > so we can get misunderstandings hammered out and general acceptance of > > the consensus. > > I suspect you are right, but throwing around some thoughts in advance, > to spark new ideas, can't hurt? I hate going to meetings where the > agenda has a topic, but no background discussion. It means that I have > to do all my thinking on my feet (not that I'll be at this meeting). I have no desire to shut down discussion on the list! I just wished to point out that I don't think we're going to reach consensus on this issue, and so it'll be worth having on the agenda. Also, I am sad that I won't see you in Boston, and that you weren't able to be in Hobart either. Maybe Sydney next year? -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org