From: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov@tarantool.org>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: cl@linux.com, penberg@kernel.org, rientjes@google.com,
iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, jsvana@fb.com,
hannes@cmpxchg.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-mm@kvack.org, cgroups@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@fb.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/10] slab: use memcg_kmem_cache_wq for slab destruction operations
Date: Sun, 29 Jan 2017 19:04:17 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170129160416.GA1795@esperanza> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170117235411.9408-11-tj@kernel.org>
On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 03:54:11PM -0800, Tejun Heo wrote:
> If there's contention on slab_mutex, queueing the per-cache
> destruction work item on the system_wq can unnecessarily create and
> tie up a lot of kworkers.
>
> Rename memcg_kmem_cache_create_wq to memcg_kmem_cache_wq and make it
> global and use that workqueue for the destruction work items too.
> While at it, convert the workqueue from an unbound workqueue to a
> per-cpu one with concurrency limited to 1. It's generally preferable
> to use per-cpu workqueues and concurrency limit of 1 is safe enough.
>
> This is suggested by Joonsoo Kim.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
> Reported-by: Jay Vana <jsvana@fb.com>
> Cc: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov.dev@gmail.com>
> Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>
> Cc: Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org>
> Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
> Cc: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>
> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Acked-by: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov.dev@gmail.com>
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-01-29 16:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-01-17 23:54 [PATCHSET v3] slab: make memcg slab destruction scalable Tejun Heo
2017-01-17 23:54 ` [PATCH 01/10] Revert "slub: move synchronize_sched out of slab_mutex on shrink" Tejun Heo
2017-01-17 23:54 ` [PATCH 02/10] slub: separate out sysfs_slab_release() from sysfs_slab_remove() Tejun Heo
2017-01-23 22:54 ` [PATCH v2 " Tejun Heo
2017-01-27 18:00 ` Vladimir Davydov
2017-01-17 23:54 ` [PATCH 03/10] slab: remove synchronous rcu_barrier() call in memcg cache release path Tejun Heo
2017-01-27 18:03 ` Vladimir Davydov
2017-01-17 23:54 ` [PATCH 04/10] slab: reorganize memcg_cache_params Tejun Heo
2017-01-17 23:54 ` [PATCH 05/10] slab: link memcg kmem_caches on their associated memory cgroup Tejun Heo
2017-01-17 23:54 ` [PATCH 06/10] slab: implement slab_root_caches list Tejun Heo
2017-01-27 18:06 ` Vladimir Davydov
2017-01-17 23:54 ` [PATCH 07/10] slab: introduce __kmemcg_cache_deactivate() Tejun Heo
2017-01-17 23:54 ` [PATCH 08/10] slab: remove synchronous synchronize_sched() from memcg cache deactivation path Tejun Heo
2017-01-17 23:54 ` [PATCH 09/10] slab: remove slub sysfs interface files early for empty memcg caches Tejun Heo
2017-01-17 23:54 ` [PATCH 10/10] slab: use memcg_kmem_cache_wq for slab destruction operations Tejun Heo
2017-01-29 16:04 ` Vladimir Davydov [this message]
2017-02-03 17:43 ` [PATCHSET v3] slab: make memcg slab destruction scalable Tejun Heo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170129160416.GA1795@esperanza \
--to=vdavydov@tarantool.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=cl@linux.com \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com \
--cc=jsvana@fb.com \
--cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=penberg@kernel.org \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).