From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-pf0-f200.google.com (mail-pf0-f200.google.com [209.85.192.200]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A20886B0448 for ; Thu, 9 Mar 2017 03:27:29 -0500 (EST) Received: by mail-pf0-f200.google.com with SMTP id o126so101339253pfb.2 for ; Thu, 09 Mar 2017 00:27:29 -0800 (PST) Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com. [148.163.156.1]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id n25si5742092pgd.378.2017.03.09.00.27.28 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 09 Mar 2017 00:27:28 -0800 (PST) Received: from pps.filterd (m0098393.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.20/8.16.0.20) with SMTP id v298EHEg066104 for ; Thu, 9 Mar 2017 03:27:28 -0500 Received: from e06smtp13.uk.ibm.com (e06smtp13.uk.ibm.com [195.75.94.109]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 292f845s8y-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Thu, 09 Mar 2017 03:27:28 -0500 Received: from localhost by e06smtp13.uk.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Thu, 9 Mar 2017 08:27:24 -0000 Date: Thu, 9 Mar 2017 09:27:19 +0100 From: Heiko Carstens Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] s390: get rid of superfluous __GFP_REPEAT References: <20170307154843.32516-1-mhocko@kernel.org> <20170307154843.32516-2-mhocko@kernel.org> <20170308082340.GB12158@osiris> <20170308141110.GL11028@dhcp22.suse.cz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20170308141110.GL11028@dhcp22.suse.cz> Message-Id: <20170309082719.GC9011@osiris> Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: Michal Hocko Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, Vlastimil Babka , Johannes Weiner , Mel Gorman , Andrew Morton , LKML On Wed, Mar 08, 2017 at 03:11:10PM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote: > On Wed 08-03-17 09:23:40, Heiko Carstens wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 07, 2017 at 04:48:40PM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote: > > > From: Michal Hocko > > > > > > __GFP_REPEAT has a rather weak semantic but since it has been introduced > > > around 2.6.12 it has been ignored for low order allocations. > > > > > > page_table_alloc then uses the flag for a single page allocation. This > > > means that this flag has never been actually useful here because it has > > > always been used only for PAGE_ALLOC_COSTLY requests. > > > > > > An earlier attempt to remove the flag 10d58bf297e2 ("s390: get rid of > > > superfluous __GFP_REPEAT") has missed this one but the situation is very > > > same here. > > > > > > Cc: Heiko Carstens > > > Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko > > > --- > > > arch/s390/mm/pgalloc.c | 2 +- > > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > FWIW: > > Acked-by: Heiko Carstens > > Thanks > > > If you want, this can be routed via the s390 tree, whatever you prefer. > > Yes, that would be great. I suspect the rest will take longer to get > merged or land to a conclusion. Ok, applied. Thanks! :) -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org