From: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: "mm: fix lazyfree BUG_ON check in try_to_unmap_one()" build error
Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2017 09:45:22 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170310004522.GA12267@bbox> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170309132706.1cb4fc7d2e846923eedf788c@linux-foundation.org>
Hi Andrew,
On Thu, Mar 09, 2017 at 01:27:06PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Thu, 9 Mar 2017 15:02:26 +0900 Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> > Sergey reported VM_WARN_ON_ONCE returns void with !CONFIG_DEBUG_VM
> > so we cannot use it as if's condition unlike WARN_ON.
>
> Can we instead fix VM_WARN_ON_ONCE()?
I thought the direction but the reason to decide WARN_ON_ONCE in this case
is losing of benefit with using CONFIG_DEBU_VM if we go that way.
I think the benefit with VM_WARN_ON friends is that it should be completely
out from the binary in !CONFIG_DEBUG_VM. However, if we fix VM_WARN_ON
like WARN_ON to !!condition, at least, compiler should generate condition
check and return so it's not what CONFIG_DEBUG_VM want, IMHO.
However, if guys believe it's okay to add some instructions to debug VM
although we disable CONFIG_DEBUG_VM, we can go that way.
It's a just policy matter. ;-)
Anyway, Even though we fix VM_WARN_ON_ONCE, in my case, WARN_ON_ONCE is
better because we should do !!condition regardless of CONFIG_DEBUG_VM
and if so, WARN_ON is more wide coverage than VM_WARN_ON which only works
with CONFIG_DEBUG_VM.
Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-03-10 0:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-03-09 4:29 "mm: fix lazyfree BUG_ON check in try_to_unmap_one()" build error Sergey Senozhatsky
2017-03-09 6:02 ` Minchan Kim
2017-03-09 8:50 ` Michal Hocko
2017-03-09 21:27 ` Andrew Morton
2017-03-10 0:45 ` Minchan Kim [this message]
2017-03-10 9:31 ` Vlastimil Babka
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170310004522.GA12267@bbox \
--to=minchan@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).