linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>,
	Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
	Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: "mm: fix lazyfree BUG_ON check in try_to_unmap_one()" build error
Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2017 09:45:22 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170310004522.GA12267@bbox> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170309132706.1cb4fc7d2e846923eedf788c@linux-foundation.org>

Hi Andrew,

On Thu, Mar 09, 2017 at 01:27:06PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Thu, 9 Mar 2017 15:02:26 +0900 Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org> wrote:
> 
> > Sergey reported VM_WARN_ON_ONCE returns void with !CONFIG_DEBUG_VM
> > so we cannot use it as if's condition unlike WARN_ON.
> 
> Can we instead fix VM_WARN_ON_ONCE()?

I thought the direction but the reason to decide WARN_ON_ONCE in this case
is losing of benefit with using CONFIG_DEBU_VM if we go that way.

I think the benefit with VM_WARN_ON friends is that it should be completely
out from the binary in !CONFIG_DEBUG_VM. However, if we fix VM_WARN_ON
like WARN_ON to !!condition, at least, compiler should generate condition
check and return so it's not what CONFIG_DEBUG_VM want, IMHO.
However, if guys believe it's okay to add some instructions to debug VM
although we disable CONFIG_DEBUG_VM, we can go that way.
It's a just policy matter. ;-)

Anyway, Even though we fix VM_WARN_ON_ONCE, in my case, WARN_ON_ONCE is
better because we should do !!condition regardless of CONFIG_DEBUG_VM
and if so, WARN_ON is more wide coverage than VM_WARN_ON which only works
with CONFIG_DEBUG_VM.

Thanks.

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2017-03-10  0:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-03-09  4:29 "mm: fix lazyfree BUG_ON check in try_to_unmap_one()" build error Sergey Senozhatsky
2017-03-09  6:02 ` Minchan Kim
2017-03-09  8:50   ` Michal Hocko
2017-03-09 21:27   ` Andrew Morton
2017-03-10  0:45     ` Minchan Kim [this message]
2017-03-10  9:31       ` Vlastimil Babka

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170310004522.GA12267@bbox \
    --to=minchan@kernel.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mhocko@suse.com \
    --cc=sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).