linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@intel.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
	Shaohua Li <shli@kernel.org>, Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>,
	Huang Ying <ying.huang@intel.com>,
	Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com>,
	Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>,
	"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>,
	Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@oracle.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 5/5] mm, swap: Sort swap entries before free
Date: Fri, 17 Mar 2017 14:46:23 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170317064635.12792-5-ying.huang@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170317064635.12792-1-ying.huang@intel.com>

From: Huang Ying <ying.huang@intel.com>

To reduce the lock contention of swap_info_struct->lock when freeing
swap entry.  The freed swap entries will be collected in a per-CPU
buffer firstly, and be really freed later in batch.  During the batch
freeing, if the consecutive swap entries in the per-CPU buffer belongs
to same swap device, the swap_info_struct->lock needs to be
acquired/released only once, so that the lock contention could be
reduced greatly.  But if there are multiple swap devices, it is
possible that the lock may be unnecessarily released/acquired because
the swap entries belong to the same swap device are non-consecutive in
the per-CPU buffer.

To solve the issue, the per-CPU buffer is sorted according to the swap
device before freeing the swap entries.  Test shows that the time
spent by swapcache_free_entries() could be reduced after the patch.

Test the patch via measuring the run time of swap_cache_free_entries()
during the exit phase of the applications use much swap space.  The
results shows that the average run time of swap_cache_free_entries()
reduced about 20% after applying the patch.

Signed-off-by: Huang Ying <ying.huang@intel.com>
Acked-by: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@intel.com>
---
 mm/swapfile.c | 9 +++++++++
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)

diff --git a/mm/swapfile.c b/mm/swapfile.c
index 1fb966cf2175..dc1716c7997f 100644
--- a/mm/swapfile.c
+++ b/mm/swapfile.c
@@ -37,6 +37,7 @@
 #include <linux/swapfile.h>
 #include <linux/export.h>
 #include <linux/swap_slots.h>
+#include <linux/sort.h>
 
 #include <asm/pgtable.h>
 #include <asm/tlbflush.h>
@@ -1065,6 +1066,13 @@ void swapcache_free(swp_entry_t entry)
 	}
 }
 
+static int swp_entry_cmp(const void *ent1, const void *ent2)
+{
+	const swp_entry_t *e1 = ent1, *e2 = ent2;
+
+	return (long)(swp_type(*e1) - swp_type(*e2));
+}
+
 void swapcache_free_entries(swp_entry_t *entries, int n)
 {
 	struct swap_info_struct *p, *prev;
@@ -1075,6 +1083,7 @@ void swapcache_free_entries(swp_entry_t *entries, int n)
 
 	prev = NULL;
 	p = NULL;
+	sort(entries, n, sizeof(entries[0]), swp_entry_cmp, NULL);
 	for (i = 0; i < n; ++i) {
 		p = swap_info_get_cont(entries[i], prev);
 		if (p)
-- 
2.11.0

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  parent reply	other threads:[~2017-03-17  6:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-03-17  6:46 [PATCH 1/5] mm, swap: Fix comment in __read_swap_cache_async Huang, Ying
2017-03-17  6:46 ` [PATCH 2/5] mm, swap: Improve readability via make spin_lock/unlock balanced Huang, Ying
2017-03-17  6:46 ` [PATCH 3/5] mm, swap: Avoid lock swap_avail_lock when held cluster lock Huang, Ying
2017-03-17  6:46 ` [PATCH 4/5] mm, swap: Try kzalloc before vzalloc Huang, Ying
2017-03-17  8:52   ` David Rientjes
2017-03-17 11:47   ` Michal Hocko
2017-03-20  1:01     ` Huang, Ying
2017-03-17  6:46 ` Huang, Ying [this message]
2017-03-17 12:42 ` [PATCH 1/5] mm, swap: Fix comment in __read_swap_cache_async Rafael Aquini
2017-03-20  2:07   ` Huang, Ying

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170317064635.12792-5-ying.huang@intel.com \
    --to=ying.huang@intel.com \
    --cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mhocko@suse.com \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=riel@redhat.com \
    --cc=shli@kernel.org \
    --cc=tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=vegard.nossum@oracle.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).