From: "Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@intel.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
Shaohua Li <shli@kernel.org>, Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>,
Huang Ying <ying.huang@intel.com>,
Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>,
"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>,
Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@oracle.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH -v2 2/2] mm, swap: Sort swap entries before free
Date: Mon, 20 Mar 2017 16:47:23 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170320084732.3375-2-ying.huang@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170320084732.3375-1-ying.huang@intel.com>
From: Huang Ying <ying.huang@intel.com>
To reduce the lock contention of swap_info_struct->lock when freeing
swap entry. The freed swap entries will be collected in a per-CPU
buffer firstly, and be really freed later in batch. During the batch
freeing, if the consecutive swap entries in the per-CPU buffer belongs
to same swap device, the swap_info_struct->lock needs to be
acquired/released only once, so that the lock contention could be
reduced greatly. But if there are multiple swap devices, it is
possible that the lock may be unnecessarily released/acquired because
the swap entries belong to the same swap device are non-consecutive in
the per-CPU buffer.
To solve the issue, the per-CPU buffer is sorted according to the swap
device before freeing the swap entries. Test shows that the time
spent by swapcache_free_entries() could be reduced after the patch.
Test the patch via measuring the run time of swap_cache_free_entries()
during the exit phase of the applications use much swap space. The
results shows that the average run time of swap_cache_free_entries()
reduced about 20% after applying the patch.
Signed-off-by: Huang Ying <ying.huang@intel.com>
Acked-by: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@intel.com>
---
mm/swapfile.c | 9 +++++++++
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
diff --git a/mm/swapfile.c b/mm/swapfile.c
index 90054f3c2cdc..1628dd88da40 100644
--- a/mm/swapfile.c
+++ b/mm/swapfile.c
@@ -37,6 +37,7 @@
#include <linux/swapfile.h>
#include <linux/export.h>
#include <linux/swap_slots.h>
+#include <linux/sort.h>
#include <asm/pgtable.h>
#include <asm/tlbflush.h>
@@ -1065,6 +1066,13 @@ void swapcache_free(swp_entry_t entry)
}
}
+static int swp_entry_cmp(const void *ent1, const void *ent2)
+{
+ const swp_entry_t *e1 = ent1, *e2 = ent2;
+
+ return (long)(swp_type(*e1) - swp_type(*e2));
+}
+
void swapcache_free_entries(swp_entry_t *entries, int n)
{
struct swap_info_struct *p, *prev;
@@ -1075,6 +1083,7 @@ void swapcache_free_entries(swp_entry_t *entries, int n)
prev = NULL;
p = NULL;
+ sort(entries, n, sizeof(entries[0]), swp_entry_cmp, NULL);
for (i = 0; i < n; ++i) {
p = swap_info_get_cont(entries[i], prev);
if (p)
--
2.11.0
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-03-20 8:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-03-20 8:47 [PATCH -v2 1/2] mm, swap: Use kvzalloc to allocate some swap data structure Huang, Ying
2017-03-20 8:47 ` Huang, Ying [this message]
2017-03-20 21:32 ` David Rientjes
2017-03-24 2:41 ` Huang, Ying
2017-03-24 4:27 ` John Hubbard
2017-03-24 4:52 ` Huang, Ying
2017-03-24 6:48 ` John Hubbard
2017-03-24 7:16 ` Huang, Ying
2017-03-24 7:33 ` John Hubbard
2017-03-24 13:56 ` Dave Hansen
2017-03-24 16:52 ` Tim Chen
2017-03-24 18:15 ` John Hubbard
2017-03-30 16:31 ` Michal Hocko
2017-04-01 4:47 ` Huang, Ying
2017-04-03 8:15 ` Michal Hocko
2017-04-05 0:49 ` Huang, Ying
2017-04-05 13:43 ` Vlastimil Babka
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170320084732.3375-2-ying.huang@intel.com \
--to=ying.huang@intel.com \
--cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=riel@redhat.com \
--cc=shli@kernel.org \
--cc=tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=vegard.nossum@oracle.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).