From: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@shutemov.name>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/mm: pgds getting out of sync after memory hot remove
Date: Mon, 22 May 2017 17:29:17 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170522142917.pxvev563djdmm2ia@node.shutemov.name> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170522141150.GA3813@redhat.com>
On Mon, May 22, 2017 at 10:11:51AM -0400, Jerome Glisse wrote:
> On Mon, May 22, 2017 at 04:12:15PM +0300, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> > On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 02:01:26PM -0400, Jerome Glisse wrote:
> > > After memory hot remove it seems we do not synchronize pgds for kernel
> > > virtual memory range (on vmemmap_free()). This seems bogus to me as it
> > > means we are left with stall entry for process with mm != mm_init
> > >
> > > Yet i am puzzle by the fact that i am only now hitting this issue. It
> > > never was an issue with 4.12 or before ie HMM never triggered following
> > > BUG_ON inside sync_global_pgds():
> > >
> > > if (!p4d_none(*p4d_ref) && !p4d_none(*p4d))
> > > BUG_ON(p4d_page_vaddr(*p4d) != p4d_page_vaddr(*p4d_ref));
> > >
> > >
> > > It seems that Kirill 5 level page table changes play a role in this
> > > behavior change. I could not bisect because HMM is painfull to rebase
> > > for each bisection step so that is just my best guess.
> > >
> > >
> > > Am i missing something here ? Am i wrong in assuming that should sync
> > > pgd on vmemmap_free() ? If so anyone have a good guess on why i am now
> > > seeing the above BUG_ON ?
> >
> > What would we gain by syncing pgd on free? Stale pgds are fine as long as
> > they are not referenced (use-after-free case). Syncing is addtional work.
>
> Well then how do i avoid the BUG_ON above ? Because the init_mm pgd is
> clear but none of the stall entry in any other mm. So if i unplug memory
> and replug memory at exact same address it tries to allocate new p4d/pud
> for struct page area and then when sync_global_pgds() is call it goes
> over the list of pgd and BUG_ON() :
>
> if (!p4d_none(*p4d_ref) && !p4d_none(*p4d))
> BUG_ON(p4d_page_vaddr(*p4d) != p4d_page_vaddr(*p4d_ref));
>
>
> So to me either above check need to go and we should overwritte pgd no
> matter what or we should restore previous behavior. I don't mind either
> one.
I would prefer to drop the BUG_ON.
Ingo?
--
Kirill A. Shutemov
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-05-22 14:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-05-19 18:01 [PATCH] x86/mm: pgds getting out of sync after memory hot remove Jérôme Glisse
2017-05-19 18:01 ` [PATCH] x86/mm: synchronize pgd in vmemmap_free() Jérôme Glisse
2017-05-20 0:34 ` John Hubbard
2017-05-22 13:12 ` [PATCH] x86/mm: pgds getting out of sync after memory hot remove Kirill A. Shutemov
2017-05-22 14:11 ` Jerome Glisse
2017-05-22 14:29 ` Kirill A. Shutemov [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170522142917.pxvev563djdmm2ia@node.shutemov.name \
--to=kirill@shutemov.name \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).