From: Balbir Singh <bsingharora@gmail.com>
To: Jerome Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com>
Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux MM <linux-mm@kvack.org>, John Hubbard <jhubbard@nvidia.com>,
David Nellans <dnellans@nvidia.com>,
Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] mm/persistent-memory: match IORES_DESC name and enum memory_type one
Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2017 13:48:21 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170711134821.433b88c1@firefly.ozlabs.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170705184933.GD3305@redhat.com>
On Wed, 5 Jul 2017 14:49:33 -0400
Jerome Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 05, 2017 at 09:15:35AM -0700, Dan Williams wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 5, 2017 at 7:25 AM, Jerome Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com> wrote:
> > > On Mon, Jul 03, 2017 at 04:49:18PM -0700, Dan Williams wrote:
> > >> On Mon, Jul 3, 2017 at 2:14 PM, Jérôme Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com> wrote:
> > >> > Use consistent name between IORES_DESC and enum memory_type, rename
> > >> > MEMORY_DEVICE_PUBLIC to MEMORY_DEVICE_PERSISTENT. This is to free up
> > >> > the public name for CDM (cache coherent device memory) for which the
> > >> > term public is a better match.
> > >> >
> > >> > Signed-off-by: Jérôme Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com>
> > >> > Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
> > >> > Cc: Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com>
> > >> > ---
> > >> > include/linux/memremap.h | 4 ++--
> > >> > kernel/memremap.c | 2 +-
> > >> > 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> > >> >
> > >> > diff --git a/include/linux/memremap.h b/include/linux/memremap.h
> > >> > index 57546a07a558..2299cc2d387d 100644
> > >> > --- a/include/linux/memremap.h
> > >> > +++ b/include/linux/memremap.h
> > >> > @@ -41,7 +41,7 @@ static inline struct vmem_altmap *to_vmem_altmap(unsigned long memmap_start)
> > >> > * Specialize ZONE_DEVICE memory into multiple types each having differents
> > >> > * usage.
> > >> > *
> > >> > - * MEMORY_DEVICE_PUBLIC:
> > >> > + * MEMORY_DEVICE_PERSISTENT:
> > >> > * Persistent device memory (pmem): struct page might be allocated in different
> > >> > * memory and architecture might want to perform special actions. It is similar
> > >> > * to regular memory, in that the CPU can access it transparently. However,
> > >> > @@ -59,7 +59,7 @@ static inline struct vmem_altmap *to_vmem_altmap(unsigned long memmap_start)
> > >> > * include/linux/hmm.h and Documentation/vm/hmm.txt.
> > >> > */
> > >> > enum memory_type {
> > >> > - MEMORY_DEVICE_PUBLIC = 0,
> > >> > + MEMORY_DEVICE_PERSISTENT = 0,
> > >> > MEMORY_DEVICE_PRIVATE,
> > >> > };
> > >> >
> > >> > diff --git a/kernel/memremap.c b/kernel/memremap.c
> > >> > index b9baa6c07918..e82456c39a6a 100644
> > >> > --- a/kernel/memremap.c
> > >> > +++ b/kernel/memremap.c
> > >> > @@ -350,7 +350,7 @@ void *devm_memremap_pages(struct device *dev, struct resource *res,
> > >> > }
> > >> > pgmap->ref = ref;
> > >> > pgmap->res = &page_map->res;
> > >> > - pgmap->type = MEMORY_DEVICE_PUBLIC;
> > >> > + pgmap->type = MEMORY_DEVICE_PERSISTENT;
> > >> > pgmap->page_fault = NULL;
> > >> > pgmap->page_free = NULL;
> > >> > pgmap->data = NULL;
> > >>
> > >> I think we need a different name. There's nothing "persistent" about
> > >> the devm_memremap_pages() path. Why can't they share name, is the only
> > >> difference coherence? I'm thinking something like:
> > >>
> > >> MEMORY_DEVICE_PRIVATE
> > >> MEMORY_DEVICE_COHERENT /* persistent memory and coherent devices */
> > >> MEMORY_DEVICE_IO /* "public", but not coherent */
> > >
> > > No that would not work. Device public (in the context of this patchset)
> > > is like device private ie device public page can be anywhere inside a
> > > process address space either as anonymous memory page or as file back
> > > page of regular filesystem (ie vma->ops is not pointing to anything
> > > specific to the device memory).
> > >
> > > As such device public is different from how persistent memory is use
> > > and those the cache coherency being the same between the two kind of
> > > memory is not a discerning factor. So i need to distinguish between
> > > persistent memory and device public memory.
> > >
> > > I believe keeping enum memory_type close to IORES_DESC naming is the
> > > cleanest way to do that but i am open to other name suggestion.
> > >
> >
> > The IORES_DESC has nothing to do with how the memory range is handled
> > by the core mm. It sounds like the distinction this is trying to make
> > is between MEMORY_DEVICE_{PUBLIC,PRIVATE} and MEMORY_DEVICE_HOST.
> > Where a "host" memory range is one that does not need coordination
> > with a specific device.
>
> I want to distinguish between:
> - device memory that is not accessible by the CPU
> - device memory that is accessible by the CPU just like regular
> memory
> - existing user of devm_memremap_pages() which is persistent memory
> (only pmem seems to call devm_memremap_pages()) that is use like a
> filesystem or block device and thus isn't use like generic page in
> a process address space
>
> So if existing user of devm_memremap_pages() are only persistent memory
> then it made sense to match the IORES_DESC we are expecting to see on
> see such memory.
>
> For public device memory (in the sense introduced by this patchset) i
> do not know how it will be described by IORES_DESC. i think first folks
> with it are IBM with CAPI and i am not sure they defined something for
> that already.
>
> I am open to any name beside public (well any reasonable name :)) but
> i do need to be able to distinguish persistent memory as use today from
> this device memory.
>
> Cheers,
> Jérôme
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-07-11 3:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-07-03 21:14 [PATCH 0/5] Cache coherent device memory (CDM) with HMM v3 Jérôme Glisse
2017-07-03 21:14 ` [PATCH 1/5] mm/persistent-memory: match IORES_DESC name and enum memory_type one Jérôme Glisse
2017-07-03 23:49 ` Dan Williams
2017-07-05 14:25 ` Jerome Glisse
2017-07-05 16:15 ` Dan Williams
2017-07-05 18:49 ` Jerome Glisse
2017-07-11 3:48 ` Balbir Singh [this message]
2017-07-11 7:31 ` Dan Williams
2017-07-11 15:05 ` Jerome Glisse
2017-07-11 16:49 ` Dan Williams
2017-07-03 21:14 ` [PATCH 2/5] mm/device-public-memory: device memory cache coherent with CPU v2 Jérôme Glisse
2017-07-11 4:12 ` Balbir Singh
2017-07-11 14:57 ` Jerome Glisse
2017-07-12 5:50 ` Balbir Singh
2017-07-03 21:14 ` [PATCH 3/5] mm/hmm: add new helper to hotplug CDM memory region Jérôme Glisse
2017-07-03 21:14 ` [PATCH 4/5] mm/memcontrol: allow to uncharge page without using page->lru field Jérôme Glisse
2017-07-04 12:51 ` Michal Hocko
2017-07-05 3:18 ` Balbir Singh
2017-07-05 6:38 ` Michal Hocko
2017-07-05 10:22 ` Balbir Singh
2017-07-05 14:35 ` Jerome Glisse
2017-07-10 8:28 ` Michal Hocko
2017-07-10 15:32 ` Jerome Glisse
2017-07-10 16:04 ` Michal Hocko
2017-07-10 16:25 ` Jerome Glisse
2017-07-10 16:36 ` Michal Hocko
2017-07-10 16:54 ` Jerome Glisse
2017-07-10 17:48 ` Michal Hocko
2017-07-10 18:10 ` Jerome Glisse
2017-07-03 21:14 ` [PATCH 5/5] mm/memcontrol: support MEMORY_DEVICE_PRIVATE and MEMORY_DEVICE_PUBLIC Jérôme Glisse
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170711134821.433b88c1@firefly.ozlabs.ibm.com \
--to=bsingharora@gmail.com \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=dnellans@nvidia.com \
--cc=jglisse@redhat.com \
--cc=jhubbard@nvidia.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).