From: Punit Agrawal <punit.agrawal@arm.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Punit Agrawal <punit.agrawal@arm.com>,
Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, steve.capper@arm.com,
will.deacon@arm.com, catalin.marinas@arm.com,
kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com, Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>,
Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>
Subject: [PATCH 1/1] mm/hugetlb: Make huge_pte_offset() consistent and document behaviour
Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2017 16:41:14 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170725154114.24131-2-punit.agrawal@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170725154114.24131-1-punit.agrawal@arm.com>
When walking the page tables to resolve an address that points to
!p*d_present() entry, huge_pte_offset() returns inconsistent values
depending on the level of page table (PUD or PMD).
It returns NULL in the case of a PUD entry while in the case of a PMD
entry, it returns a pointer to the page table entry.
A similar inconsitency exists when handling swap entries - returns NULL
for a PUD entry while a pointer to the pte_t is retured for the PMD
entry.
Update huge_pte_offset() to make the behaviour consistent - return NULL
in the case of p*d_none() and a pointer to the pte_t for hugepage or
swap entries.
Document the behaviour to clarify the expected behaviour of this
function. This is to set clear semantics for architecture specific
implementations of huge_pte_offset().
Signed-off-by: Punit Agrawal <punit.agrawal@arm.com>
---
mm/hugetlb.c | 22 +++++++++++++++++++---
1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/hugetlb.c b/mm/hugetlb.c
index bc48ee783dd9..72dd1139a8e4 100644
--- a/mm/hugetlb.c
+++ b/mm/hugetlb.c
@@ -4603,6 +4603,13 @@ pte_t *huge_pte_alloc(struct mm_struct *mm,
return pte;
}
+/*
+ * huge_pte_offset() - Walk the page table to resolve the hugepage
+ * entry at address @addr
+ *
+ * Return: Pointer to page table or swap entry (PUD or PMD) for address @addr
+ * or NULL if the entry is p*d_none().
+ */
pte_t *huge_pte_offset(struct mm_struct *mm,
unsigned long addr, unsigned long sz)
{
@@ -4617,13 +4624,22 @@ pte_t *huge_pte_offset(struct mm_struct *mm,
p4d = p4d_offset(pgd, addr);
if (!p4d_present(*p4d))
return NULL;
+
pud = pud_offset(p4d, addr);
- if (!pud_present(*pud))
+ if (pud_none(*pud))
return NULL;
- if (pud_huge(*pud))
+ /* hugepage or swap? */
+ if (pud_huge(*pud) || !pud_present(*pud))
return (pte_t *)pud;
+
pmd = pmd_offset(pud, addr);
- return (pte_t *) pmd;
+ if (pmd_none(*pmd))
+ return NULL;
+ /* hugepage or swap? */
+ if (pmd_huge(*pmd) || !pmd_present(*pmd))
+ return (pte_t *) pmd;
+
+ return NULL;
}
#endif /* CONFIG_ARCH_WANT_GENERAL_HUGETLB */
--
2.11.0
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-07-25 15:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-07-25 15:41 [PATCH 0/1] Clarify huge_pte_offset() semantics Punit Agrawal
2017-07-25 15:41 ` Punit Agrawal [this message]
2017-07-26 8:39 ` [PATCH 1/1] mm/hugetlb: Make huge_pte_offset() consistent and document behaviour Catalin Marinas
2017-07-26 8:50 ` Michal Hocko
2017-07-26 8:53 ` Michal Hocko
2017-07-26 12:11 ` Punit Agrawal
2017-07-26 12:33 ` Michal Hocko
2017-07-26 12:47 ` Michal Hocko
2017-07-26 13:34 ` Punit Agrawal
2017-07-27 3:16 ` Mike Kravetz
2017-07-27 12:58 ` Punit Agrawal
2017-08-18 14:54 ` [PATCH v2] mm/hugetlb.c: make " Punit Agrawal
2017-08-18 21:29 ` Mike Kravetz
2017-08-21 18:07 ` Catalin Marinas
2017-08-21 21:30 ` Mike Kravetz
2017-08-22 15:32 ` Punit Agrawal
2017-08-22 10:11 ` Catalin Marinas
2017-08-30 7:49 ` Michal Hocko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170725154114.24131-2-punit.agrawal@arm.com \
--to=punit.agrawal@arm.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=mike.kravetz@oracle.com \
--cc=n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com \
--cc=steve.capper@arm.com \
--cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).