From: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
kernel-team@fb.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] mm/sched: memdelay: memory health interface for systems and workloads
Date: Tue, 1 Aug 2017 08:26:34 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170801122634.GA7237@cmpxchg.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170801075728.GE6524@worktop.programming.kicks-ass.net>
On Tue, Aug 01, 2017 at 09:57:28AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 02:41:42PM -0400, Johannes Weiner wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 10:31:11AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>
> > > So could you start by describing what actual statistics we need? Because
> > > as is the scheduler already does a gazillion stats and why can't re
> > > repurpose some of those?
> >
> > If that's possible, that would be great of course.
> >
> > We want to be able to tell how many tasks in a domain (the system or a
> > memory cgroup) are inside a memdelay section as opposed to how many
>
> And you haven't even defined wth a memdelay section is yet..
It's what a task is in after it calls memdelay_enter() and before it
calls memdelay_leave().
Tasks mark themselves to be in a memory section when they know to
perform work that is necessary due to a lack of memory, such as
waiting for a refault or a direct reclaim invocation.
>From the patch:
+/**
+ * memdelay_enter - mark the beginning of a memory delay section
+ * @flags: flags to handle nested memdelay sections
+ *
+ * Marks the calling task as being delayed due to a lack of memory,
+ * such as waiting for a workingset refault or performing reclaim.
+ */
+/**
+ * memdelay_leave - mark the end of a memory delay section
+ * @flags: flags to handle nested memdelay sections
+ *
+ * Marks the calling task as no longer delayed due to memory.
+ */
where a reclaim callsite looks like this (decluttered):
memdelay_enter()
nr_reclaimed = do_try_to_free_pages()
memdelay_leave()
That's what defines the "unproductive due to lack of memory" state of
a task. Time spent in that state weighed against time spent while the
task is productive - runnable or in iowait while not in a memdelay
section - gives the memory health of the task. And the system and
cgroup states/health can be derived from task states as described:
> > are in a "productive" state such as runnable or iowait. Then derive
> > from that whether the domain as a whole is unproductive (all non-idle
> > tasks memdelayed), or partially unproductive (some delayed, but CPUs
> > are productive or there are iowait tasks). Then derive the percentages
> > of walltime the domain spends partially or fully unproductive.
> >
> > For that we need per-domain counters for
> >
> > 1) nr of tasks in memdelay sections
> > 2) nr of iowait or runnable/queued tasks that are NOT inside
> > memdelay sections
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-08-01 12:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-07-27 15:30 [PATCH 0/3] memdelay: memory health metric for systems and workloads Johannes Weiner
2017-07-27 15:30 ` [PATCH 1/3] sched/loadavg: consolidate LOAD_INT, LOAD_FRAC macros Johannes Weiner
2017-07-27 15:30 ` [PATCH 2/3] mm: workingset: tell cache transitions from workingset thrashing Johannes Weiner
2017-07-27 15:30 ` [PATCH 3/3] mm/sched: memdelay: memory health interface for systems and workloads Johannes Weiner
2017-07-27 15:56 ` Johannes Weiner
2017-07-29 9:10 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-07-30 15:28 ` Johannes Weiner
2017-07-31 8:31 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-07-31 18:41 ` Johannes Weiner
2017-07-31 19:49 ` Mike Galbraith
2017-07-31 20:38 ` Johannes Weiner
2017-08-01 2:23 ` Mike Galbraith
2017-08-01 7:57 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-08-01 12:26 ` Johannes Weiner [this message]
2017-08-13 14:52 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-07-29 13:31 ` kbuild test robot
2017-07-27 20:43 ` [PATCH 0/3] memdelay: memory health metric " Andrew Morton
2017-07-28 19:43 ` Johannes Weiner
2017-08-02 8:11 ` Michal Hocko
2017-07-29 2:48 ` Mike Galbraith
2017-07-29 3:21 ` Mike Galbraith
2017-07-29 6:38 ` Mike Galbraith
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170801122634.GA7237@cmpxchg.org \
--to=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=riel@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).