From: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
To: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-mm <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com>,
"karam . lee" <karam.lee@lge.com>,
seungho1.park@lge.com, Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>,
Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>, Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@intel.com>,
"linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org" <linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org>,
kernel-team <kernel-team@lge.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 2/6] fs: use on-stack-bio if backing device has BDI_CAP_SYNC capability
Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2017 13:48:00 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170816044759.GC24294@blaptop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <058b4ae5-c6e9-ff32-6440-fb1e1b85b6fd@kernel.dk>
Hi Jens,
On Mon, Aug 14, 2017 at 10:17:09AM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On 08/14/2017 09:38 AM, Jens Axboe wrote:
> > On 08/14/2017 09:31 AM, Minchan Kim wrote:
> >>> Secondly, generally you don't have slow devices and fast devices
> >>> intermingled when running workloads. That's the rare case.
> >>
> >> Not true. zRam is really popular swap for embedded devices where
> >> one of low cost product has a really poor slow nand compared to
> >> lz4/lzo [de]comression.
> >
> > I guess that's true for some cases. But as I said earlier, the recycling
> > really doesn't care about this at all. They can happily coexist, and not
> > step on each others toes.
>
> Dusted it off, result is here against -rc5:
>
> http://git.kernel.dk/cgit/linux-block/log/?h=cpu-alloc-cache
>
> I'd like to split the amount of units we cache and the amount of units
> we free, right now they are both CPU_ALLOC_CACHE_SIZE. This means that
> once we hit that count, we free all of the, and then store the one we
> were asked to free. That always keeps 1 local, but maybe it'd make more
> sense to cache just free CPU_ALLOC_CACHE_SIZE/2 (or something like that)
> so that we retain more than 1 per cpu in case and app preempts when
> sleeping for IO and the new task on that CPU then issues IO as well.
> Probably minor.
>
> Ran a quick test on nullb0 with 32 sync readers. The test was O_DIRECT
> on the block device, so I disabled the __blkdev_direct_IO_simple()
> bypass. With the above branch, we get ~18.0M IOPS, and without we get
> ~14M IOPS. Both ran with iostats disabled, to avoid any interference
> from that.
Looks promising.
If recycling bio works well enough, I think we don't need to introduce
new split in the path for on-stack bio.
I will test your version on zram-swap!
Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-08-16 4:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-08-08 6:50 [PATCH v1 0/6] Remove rw_page Minchan Kim
2017-08-08 6:50 ` [PATCH v1 1/6] bdi: introduce BDI_CAP_SYNC Minchan Kim
2017-08-08 6:50 ` [PATCH v1 2/6] fs: use on-stack-bio if backing device has BDI_CAP_SYNC capability Minchan Kim
2017-08-08 12:49 ` Matthew Wilcox
2017-08-08 13:29 ` Matthew Wilcox
2017-08-09 1:51 ` Minchan Kim
2017-08-09 2:31 ` Matthew Wilcox
2017-08-09 2:41 ` Minchan Kim
2017-08-10 3:04 ` Matthew Wilcox
2017-08-10 3:06 ` Dan Williams
2017-08-11 10:46 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-08-11 14:26 ` Jens Axboe
2017-08-14 8:50 ` Minchan Kim
2017-08-14 14:36 ` Jens Axboe
2017-08-14 15:06 ` Minchan Kim
2017-08-14 15:14 ` Jens Axboe
2017-08-14 15:31 ` Minchan Kim
2017-08-14 15:38 ` Jens Axboe
2017-08-14 16:17 ` Jens Axboe
2017-08-16 4:48 ` Minchan Kim [this message]
2017-08-16 15:56 ` Jens Axboe
2017-08-21 6:13 ` Minchan Kim
2017-08-14 8:48 ` Minchan Kim
2017-08-10 4:00 ` Minchan Kim
2017-08-09 1:48 ` Minchan Kim
2017-08-08 6:50 ` [PATCH v1 3/6] mm:swap: remove end_swap_bio_write argument Minchan Kim
2017-08-08 6:50 ` [PATCH v1 4/6] mm:swap: use on-stack-bio for BDI_CAP_SYNC devices Minchan Kim
2017-08-08 6:50 ` [PATCH v1 5/6] zram: remove zram_rw_page Minchan Kim
2017-08-08 7:02 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2017-08-08 8:13 ` Minchan Kim
2017-08-08 8:23 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2017-08-08 15:48 ` Matthew Wilcox
2017-08-08 6:50 ` [PATCH v1 6/6] fs: remove rw_page Minchan Kim
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170816044759.GC24294@blaptop \
--to=minchan@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=karam.lee@lge.com \
--cc=kernel-team@lge.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org \
--cc=ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com \
--cc=seungho1.park@lge.com \
--cc=vishal.l.verma@intel.com \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).