From: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>
To: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm, oom_reaper: skip mm structs with mmu notifiers
Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2017 15:18:30 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170913131830.GA12833@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170913113427.2291-1-mhocko@kernel.org>
On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 01:34:27PM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
> From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
>
> Andrea has noticed that the oom_reaper doesn't invalidate the range
> via mmu notifiers (mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_start,
> mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_end) and that can corrupt the memory
> of the kvm guest for example.
>
> tlb_flush_mmu_tlbonly already invokes mmu notifiers but that is not
> sufficient as per Andrea:
> : mmu_notifier_invalidate_range cannot be used in replacement of
> : mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_start/end. For KVM
> : mmu_notifier_invalidate_range is a noop and rightfully so. A MMU
> : notifier implementation has to implement either
> : ->invalidate_range method or the invalidate_range_start/end
> : methods, not both. And if you implement invalidate_range_start/end
> : like KVM is forced to do, calling mmu_notifier_invalidate_range in
> : common code is a noop for KVM.
> :
> : For those MMU notifiers that can get away only implementing
> : ->invalidate_range, the ->invalidate_range is implicitly called by
> : mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_end(). And only those secondary MMUs
> : that share the same pagetable with the primary MMU (like AMD
> : iommuv2) can get away only implementing ->invalidate_range.
>
> As the callback is allowed to sleep and the implementation is out
> of hand of the MM it is safer to simply bail out if there is an
> mmu notifier registered. In order to not fail too early make the
> mm_has_notifiers check under the oom_lock and have a little nap before
> failing to give the current oom victim some more time to exit.
>
> Changes since v1
> - move mm_has_notifiers check after we hold mmap_sem to prevent from
> any potential races as per Andrea
>
> Fixes: aac453635549 ("mm, oom: introduce oom reaper")
> Noticed-by: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>
> Cc: stable
> Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
> ---
> Hi,
> I have posted this as an RFC previously [1]. I have updated
> the changelog to be more clear about the issue and moved the
> mm_has_notifiers after the lock has been take based on Andrea's
> suggestion.
>
> Can we merge this?
>
> [1] http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170830084600.17491-1-mhocko@kernel.org
>
> include/linux/mmu_notifier.h | 5 +++++
> mm/oom_kill.c | 16 ++++++++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 21 insertions(+)
Reviewed-by: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-09-13 13:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-09-13 11:34 [PATCH] mm, oom_reaper: skip mm structs with mmu notifiers Michal Hocko
2017-09-13 13:18 ` Andrea Arcangeli [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170913131830.GA12833@redhat.com \
--to=aarcange@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).