[PATCH] mm/memcg: avoid page count check for zone device

[PATCH] mm/memcg: avoid page count check for zone device

[jglisse]

From: JA(C)rA'me Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com>

Fix for 4.14, zone device page always have an elevated refcount
of one and thus page count sanity check in uncharge_page() is
inappropriate for them.

Signed-off-by: JA(C)rA'me Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com>
Reported-by: Evgeny Baskakov <ebaskakov@nvidia.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
Cc: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov.dev@gmail.com>
---
 mm/memcontrol.c | 3 ++-
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
index 15af3da5af02..d51d3e1f49c9 100644
--- a/mm/memcontrol.c
+++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
@@ -5648,7 +5648,8 @@ static void uncharge_batch(const struct uncharge_gather *ug)
 static void uncharge_page(struct page *page, struct uncharge_gather *ug)
 {
 	VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(PageLRU(page), page);
-	VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(!PageHWPoison(page) && page_count(page), page);
+	VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(!PageHWPoison(page) && !is_zone_device_page(page) &&
+			page_count(page), page);
 
 	if (!page->mem_cgroup)
 		return;
-- 
2.13.5

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

Re: [PATCH] mm/memcg: avoid page count check for zone device

[Michal Hocko]

On Thu 14-09-17 15:00:11, jglisse@redhat.com wrote:
> From: Jerome Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com>
> 
> Fix for 4.14, zone device page always have an elevated refcount
> of one and thus page count sanity check in uncharge_page() is
> inappropriate for them.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jerome Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com>
> Reported-by: Evgeny Baskakov <ebaskakov@nvidia.com>
> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
> Cc: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov.dev@gmail.com>

Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>

Side note. Wouldn't it be better to re-organize the check a bit? It is
true that this is VM_BUG so it is not usually compiled in but when it
preferably checks for unlikely cases first while the ref count will be
0 in the prevailing cases. So can we have
	VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(page_count(page) && !is_zone_device_page(page) &&
			!PageHWPoison(page), page);

I would simply fold this nano optimization into the patch as you are
touching it already. Not sure it is worth a separate commit.

> ---
>  mm/memcontrol.c | 3 ++-
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
> index 15af3da5af02..d51d3e1f49c9 100644
> --- a/mm/memcontrol.c
> +++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
> @@ -5648,7 +5648,8 @@ static void uncharge_batch(const struct uncharge_gather *ug)
>  static void uncharge_page(struct page *page, struct uncharge_gather *ug)
>  {
>  	VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(PageLRU(page), page);
> -	VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(!PageHWPoison(page) && page_count(page), page);
> +	VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(!PageHWPoison(page) && !is_zone_device_page(page) &&
> +			page_count(page), page);
>  
>  	if (!page->mem_cgroup)
>  		return;
> -- 
> 2.13.5

-- 
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

Re: [PATCH] mm/memcg: avoid page count check for zone device

[Jerome Glisse]

On Fri, Sep 15, 2017 at 09:01:00AM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Thu 14-09-17 15:00:11, jglisse@redhat.com wrote:
> > From: Jerome Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com>
> > 
> > Fix for 4.14, zone device page always have an elevated refcount
> > of one and thus page count sanity check in uncharge_page() is
> > inappropriate for them.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Jerome Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com>
> > Reported-by: Evgeny Baskakov <ebaskakov@nvidia.com>
> > Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
> > Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
> > Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
> > Cc: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov.dev@gmail.com>
> 
> Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
> 
> Side note. Wouldn't it be better to re-organize the check a bit? It is
> true that this is VM_BUG so it is not usually compiled in but when it
> preferably checks for unlikely cases first while the ref count will be
> 0 in the prevailing cases. So can we have
> 	VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(page_count(page) && !is_zone_device_page(page) &&
> 			!PageHWPoison(page), page);
> 
> I would simply fold this nano optimization into the patch as you are
> touching it already. Not sure it is worth a separate commit.

I am traveling sorry for late answer. This nano optimization make sense
Andrew do you want me to respin or should we leave it be ? I don't mind
either way.

Cheers,
Jerome

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

Re: [PATCH] mm/memcg: avoid page count check for zone device

[Michal Hocko]

On Sun 17-09-17 10:45:34, Jerome Glisse wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 15, 2017 at 09:01:00AM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > On Thu 14-09-17 15:00:11, jglisse@redhat.com wrote:
> > > From: Jerome Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com>
> > > 
> > > Fix for 4.14, zone device page always have an elevated refcount
> > > of one and thus page count sanity check in uncharge_page() is
> > > inappropriate for them.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Jerome Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com>
> > > Reported-by: Evgeny Baskakov <ebaskakov@nvidia.com>
> > > Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
> > > Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
> > > Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
> > > Cc: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov.dev@gmail.com>
> > 
> > Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
> > 
> > Side note. Wouldn't it be better to re-organize the check a bit? It is
> > true that this is VM_BUG so it is not usually compiled in but when it
> > preferably checks for unlikely cases first while the ref count will be
> > 0 in the prevailing cases. So can we have
> > 	VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(page_count(page) && !is_zone_device_page(page) &&
> > 			!PageHWPoison(page), page);
> > 
> > I would simply fold this nano optimization into the patch as you are
> > touching it already. Not sure it is worth a separate commit.
> 
> I am traveling sorry for late answer. This nano optimization make sense
> Andrew do you want me to respin or should we leave it be ? I don't mind
> either way.

Andrew, could you fold this into the patch then?
---