linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH] bdi: fix cleanup when fail to percpu_counter_init
@ 2017-09-15 18:27 weiping zhang
  2017-09-18  8:35 ` Jan Kara
  2017-09-18 14:04 ` Jens Axboe
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: weiping zhang @ 2017-09-15 18:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: axboe, jack, tj; +Cc: linux-mm

when percpu_counter_init fail at i, 0 ~ (i-1) should be destoried, not
1 ~ i.

Signed-off-by: weiping zhang <zhangweiping@didichuxing.com>
---
 mm/backing-dev.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/mm/backing-dev.c b/mm/backing-dev.c
index e19606b..d399d3c 100644
--- a/mm/backing-dev.c
+++ b/mm/backing-dev.c
@@ -334,7 +334,7 @@ static int wb_init(struct bdi_writeback *wb, struct backing_dev_info *bdi,
 	return 0;
 
 out_destroy_stat:
-	while (i--)
+	while (--i >= 0)
 		percpu_counter_destroy(&wb->stat[i]);
 	fprop_local_destroy_percpu(&wb->completions);
 out_put_cong:
-- 
2.9.4

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] bdi: fix cleanup when fail to percpu_counter_init
  2017-09-15 18:27 [PATCH] bdi: fix cleanup when fail to percpu_counter_init weiping zhang
@ 2017-09-18  8:35 ` Jan Kara
  2017-09-18 14:04 ` Jens Axboe
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Jan Kara @ 2017-09-18  8:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: weiping zhang; +Cc: axboe, jack, tj, linux-mm

On Sat 16-09-17 02:27:05, weiping zhang wrote:
> when percpu_counter_init fail at i, 0 ~ (i-1) should be destoried, not
> 1 ~ i.
> 
> Signed-off-by: weiping zhang <zhangweiping@didichuxing.com>

Good catch. You can add:

Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>

								Honza

> ---
>  mm/backing-dev.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/mm/backing-dev.c b/mm/backing-dev.c
> index e19606b..d399d3c 100644
> --- a/mm/backing-dev.c
> +++ b/mm/backing-dev.c
> @@ -334,7 +334,7 @@ static int wb_init(struct bdi_writeback *wb, struct backing_dev_info *bdi,
>  	return 0;
>  
>  out_destroy_stat:
> -	while (i--)
> +	while (--i >= 0)
>  		percpu_counter_destroy(&wb->stat[i]);
>  	fprop_local_destroy_percpu(&wb->completions);
>  out_put_cong:
> -- 
> 2.9.4
> 
-- 
Jan Kara <jack@suse.com>
SUSE Labs, CR

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] bdi: fix cleanup when fail to percpu_counter_init
  2017-09-15 18:27 [PATCH] bdi: fix cleanup when fail to percpu_counter_init weiping zhang
  2017-09-18  8:35 ` Jan Kara
@ 2017-09-18 14:04 ` Jens Axboe
  2017-09-19  8:13   ` Jan Kara
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Jens Axboe @ 2017-09-18 14:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: weiping zhang, jack, tj; +Cc: linux-mm

On 09/15/2017 12:27 PM, weiping zhang wrote:
> when percpu_counter_init fail at i, 0 ~ (i-1) should be destoried, not
> 1 ~ i.
> 
> Signed-off-by: weiping zhang <zhangweiping@didichuxing.com>
> ---
>  mm/backing-dev.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/mm/backing-dev.c b/mm/backing-dev.c
> index e19606b..d399d3c 100644
> --- a/mm/backing-dev.c
> +++ b/mm/backing-dev.c
> @@ -334,7 +334,7 @@ static int wb_init(struct bdi_writeback *wb, struct backing_dev_info *bdi,
>  	return 0;
>  
>  out_destroy_stat:
> -	while (i--)
> +	while (--i >= 0)

These two constructs will produce identical results.

-- 
Jens Axboe

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] bdi: fix cleanup when fail to percpu_counter_init
  2017-09-18 14:04 ` Jens Axboe
@ 2017-09-19  8:13   ` Jan Kara
  2017-09-19 10:31     ` weiping zhang
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Jan Kara @ 2017-09-19  8:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Jens Axboe; +Cc: weiping zhang, jack, tj, linux-mm

On Mon 18-09-17 08:04:04, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On 09/15/2017 12:27 PM, weiping zhang wrote:
> > when percpu_counter_init fail at i, 0 ~ (i-1) should be destoried, not
> > 1 ~ i.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: weiping zhang <zhangweiping@didichuxing.com>
> > ---
> >  mm/backing-dev.c | 2 +-
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/mm/backing-dev.c b/mm/backing-dev.c
> > index e19606b..d399d3c 100644
> > --- a/mm/backing-dev.c
> > +++ b/mm/backing-dev.c
> > @@ -334,7 +334,7 @@ static int wb_init(struct bdi_writeback *wb, struct backing_dev_info *bdi,
> >  	return 0;
> >  
> >  out_destroy_stat:
> > -	while (i--)
> > +	while (--i >= 0)
> 
> These two constructs will produce identical results.

Bah, you are correct. I got confused.

								Honza
-- 
Jan Kara <jack@suse.com>
SUSE Labs, CR

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] bdi: fix cleanup when fail to percpu_counter_init
  2017-09-19  8:13   ` Jan Kara
@ 2017-09-19 10:31     ` weiping zhang
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: weiping zhang @ 2017-09-19 10:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Jan Kara; +Cc: Jens Axboe, tj, linux-mm

On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 10:13:31AM +0200, Jan Kara wrote:
> On Mon 18-09-17 08:04:04, Jens Axboe wrote:
> > On 09/15/2017 12:27 PM, weiping zhang wrote:
> > > when percpu_counter_init fail at i, 0 ~ (i-1) should be destoried, not
> > > 1 ~ i.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: weiping zhang <zhangweiping@didichuxing.com>
> > > ---
> > >  mm/backing-dev.c | 2 +-
> > >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/mm/backing-dev.c b/mm/backing-dev.c
> > > index e19606b..d399d3c 100644
> > > --- a/mm/backing-dev.c
> > > +++ b/mm/backing-dev.c
> > > @@ -334,7 +334,7 @@ static int wb_init(struct bdi_writeback *wb, struct backing_dev_info *bdi,
> > >  	return 0;
> > >  
> > >  out_destroy_stat:
> > > -	while (i--)
> > > +	while (--i >= 0)
> > 
> > These two constructs will produce identical results.
> 
> Bah, you are correct. I got confused.
> 

It's my fault, thanks all of you, ^_^

weiping

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2017-09-19 10:32 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2017-09-15 18:27 [PATCH] bdi: fix cleanup when fail to percpu_counter_init weiping zhang
2017-09-18  8:35 ` Jan Kara
2017-09-18 14:04 ` Jens Axboe
2017-09-19  8:13   ` Jan Kara
2017-09-19 10:31     ` weiping zhang

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).