From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
Cc: miles.chen@mediatek.com, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
wsd_upstream@mediatek.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-mm@kvack.org, iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org,
linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] dma-debug: fix incorrect pfn calculation
Date: Sun, 1 Oct 2017 10:04:49 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171001080449.GB11843@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <273077fd-c5ad-82c8-60aa-cde89355e5e8@arm.com>
On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 11:23:52AM +0100, Robin Murphy wrote:
> > I found that debug_dma_alloc_coherent() and debug_dma_free_coherent()
> > assume that dma_alloc_coherent() always returns a linear address.
> > However it's possible that dma_alloc_coherent() returns a non-linear
> > address. In this case, page_to_pfn(virt_to_page(virt)) will return an
> > incorrect pfn. If the pfn is valid and mapped as a COW page,
> > we will hit the warning when doing wp_page_copy().
Hmm, can the debug code assume anything? Right now you're just patching
it from supporting linear and vmalloc. But what about other
potential mapping types?
> > + entry->pfn = is_vmalloc_addr(virt) ? vmalloc_to_pfn(virt) :
> > + page_to_pfn(virt_to_page(virt));
Please use normal if/else conditionsals:
if (is_vmalloc_addr(virt))
entry->pfn = vmalloc_to_pfn(virt);
else
entry->pfn = page_to_pfn(virt_to_page(virt));
> > + .pfn = is_vmalloc_addr(virt) ? vmalloc_to_pfn(virt) :
> > + page_to_pfn(virt_to_page(virt)),
Same here.
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-10-01 8:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-09-27 3:48 [PATCH v3] dma-debug: fix incorrect pfn calculation miles.chen
2017-09-27 10:23 ` Robin Murphy
2017-10-01 8:04 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2017-10-02 10:30 ` Miles Chen
2017-10-03 7:07 ` Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20171001080449.GB11843@lst.de \
--to=hch@lst.de \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=m.szyprowski@samsung.com \
--cc=miles.chen@mediatek.com \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=wsd_upstream@mediatek.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).