From: "Du, Changbin" <changbin.du@intel.com>
To: Anshuman Khandual <khandual@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: changbin.du@intel.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, corbet@lwn.net,
hughd@google.com, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] mm, thp: introduce dedicated transparent huge page allocation interfaces
Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2017 17:16:39 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171017091638.GA7748@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <66a3f340-ff44-efad-48ad-a95554938a29@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 5502 bytes --]
Hi Khandual,
Thanks for your review.
On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 01:38:07PM +0530, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
> On 10/16/2017 02:49 PM, changbin.du@intel.com wrote:
> > From: Changbin Du <changbin.du@intel.com>
> >
> > This patch introduced 4 new interfaces to allocate a prepared
> > transparent huge page.
> > - alloc_transhuge_page_vma
> > - alloc_transhuge_page_nodemask
> > - alloc_transhuge_page_node
> > - alloc_transhuge_page
> >
>
> If we are trying to match HugeTLB helpers, then it should have
> format something like alloc_transhugepage_xxx instead of
> alloc_transhuge_page_XXX. But I think its okay.
>
HugeTLB helpers are something like alloc_huge_page, so I think
alloc_transhuge_page match it. And existing names already have
*transhuge_page* style.
> > diff --git a/include/linux/huge_mm.h b/include/linux/huge_mm.h
> > index 14bc21c..1dd2c33 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/huge_mm.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/huge_mm.h
> > @@ -130,9 +130,20 @@ extern unsigned long thp_get_unmapped_area(struct file *filp,
> > unsigned long addr, unsigned long len, unsigned long pgoff,
> > unsigned long flags);
> >
> > -extern void prep_transhuge_page(struct page *page);
> > extern void free_transhuge_page(struct page *page);
> >
> > +struct page *alloc_transhuge_page_vma(gfp_t gfp_mask,
> > + struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long addr);
> > +struct page *alloc_transhuge_page_nodemask(gfp_t gfp_mask,
> > + int preferred_nid, nodemask_t *nmask);
>
> Would not they require 'extern' here ?
>
Need or not, function declaration are implicitly 'extern'. I will add it to
align with existing code.
> > +
> > +static inline struct page *alloc_transhuge_page_node(int nid, gfp_t gfp_mask)
> > +{
> > + return alloc_transhuge_page_nodemask(gfp_mask, nid, NULL);
> > +}
> > +
> > +struct page *alloc_transhuge_page(gfp_t gfp_mask);
> > +
> > bool can_split_huge_page(struct page *page, int *pextra_pins);
> > int split_huge_page_to_list(struct page *page, struct list_head *list);
> > static inline int split_huge_page(struct page *page)
> > diff --git a/include/linux/migrate.h b/include/linux/migrate.h
> > index 643c7ae..70a00f3 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/migrate.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/migrate.h
> > @@ -42,19 +42,15 @@ static inline struct page *new_page_nodemask(struct page *page,
> > return alloc_huge_page_nodemask(page_hstate(compound_head(page)),
> > preferred_nid, nodemask);
> >
> > - if (thp_migration_supported() && PageTransHuge(page)) {
> > - order = HPAGE_PMD_ORDER;
> > - gfp_mask |= GFP_TRANSHUGE;
> > - }
> > -
> > if (PageHighMem(page) || (zone_idx(page_zone(page)) == ZONE_MOVABLE))
> > gfp_mask |= __GFP_HIGHMEM;
> >
> > - new_page = __alloc_pages_nodemask(gfp_mask, order,
> > + if (thp_migration_supported() && PageTransHuge(page))
> > + return alloc_transhuge_page_nodemask(gfp_mask | GFP_TRANSHUGE,
> > + preferred_nid, nodemask);
> > + else
> > + return __alloc_pages_nodemask(gfp_mask, order,
> > preferred_nid, nodemask);
> > -
> > - if (new_page && PageTransHuge(page))
> > - prep_transhuge_page(new_page);
>
> This makes sense, calling prep_transhuge_page() inside the
> function alloc_transhuge_page_nodemask() is better I guess.
>
> >
> > return new_page;
> > }
> > diff --git a/mm/huge_memory.c b/mm/huge_memory.c
> > index 269b5df..e267488 100644
> > --- a/mm/huge_memory.c
> > +++ b/mm/huge_memory.c
> > @@ -490,7 +490,7 @@ static inline struct list_head *page_deferred_list(struct page *page)
> > return (struct list_head *)&page[2].mapping;
> > }
> >
> > -void prep_transhuge_page(struct page *page)
> > +static void prep_transhuge_page(struct page *page)
>
> Right. It wont be used outside huge page allocation context and
> you have already mentioned about it.
>
> > {
> > /*
> > * we use page->mapping and page->indexlru in second tail page
> > @@ -501,6 +501,45 @@ void prep_transhuge_page(struct page *page)
> > set_compound_page_dtor(page, TRANSHUGE_PAGE_DTOR);
> > }
> >
> > +struct page *alloc_transhuge_page_vma(gfp_t gfp_mask,
> > + struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long addr)
> > +{
> > + struct page *page;
> > +
> > + page = alloc_pages_vma(gfp_mask | __GFP_COMP, HPAGE_PMD_ORDER,
> > + vma, addr, numa_node_id(), true);
> > + if (unlikely(!page))
> > + return NULL;
> > + prep_transhuge_page(page);
> > + return page;
> > +}
>
> __GFP_COMP and HPAGE_PMD_ORDER are the minimum flags which will be used
> for huge page allocation and preparation. Any thing else depending upon
> the context will be passed by the caller. Makes sense.
>
yes, thanks.
> > +
> > +struct page *alloc_transhuge_page_nodemask(gfp_t gfp_mask,
> > + int preferred_nid, nodemask_t *nmask)
> > +{
> > + struct page *page;
> > +
> > + page = __alloc_pages_nodemask(gfp_mask | __GFP_COMP, HPAGE_PMD_ORDER,
> > + preferred_nid, nmask);
> > + if (unlikely(!page))
> > + return NULL;
> > + prep_transhuge_page(page);
> > + return page;
> > +}
> > +
>
> Same here.
>
> > +struct page *alloc_transhuge_page(gfp_t gfp_mask)
> > +{
> > + struct page *page;
> > +
> > + VM_BUG_ON(!(gfp_mask & __GFP_COMP));
>
> You expect the caller to provide __GFP_COMP, why ? You are
> anyways providing it later.
>
oops, I forgot to update this line. Will remove it. Thanks for figuring it out.
--
Thanks,
Changbin Du
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 473 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-10-17 9:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-10-16 9:19 [PATCH 0/2] mm, thp: introduce dedicated transparent huge page allocation interfaces changbin.du
2017-10-16 9:19 ` [PATCH 1/2] " changbin.du
2017-10-17 8:08 ` Anshuman Khandual
2017-10-17 9:16 ` Du, Changbin [this message]
2017-10-17 10:20 ` Michal Hocko
2017-10-17 10:22 ` Michal Hocko
2017-10-18 11:00 ` Du, Changbin
2017-10-19 12:49 ` Michal Hocko
2017-10-20 8:31 ` Du, Changbin
2017-10-17 11:12 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2017-10-18 11:01 ` Du, Changbin
2017-10-18 15:54 ` kbuild test robot
2017-10-18 16:01 ` kbuild test robot
2017-10-16 9:19 ` [PATCH 2/2] mm: rename page dtor functions to {compound,huge,transhuge}_page__dtor changbin.du
2017-10-17 8:36 ` Anshuman Khandual
2017-10-17 9:21 ` Du, Changbin
2017-10-17 10:22 ` Michal Hocko
2017-10-17 11:22 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2017-10-17 12:00 ` Michal Hocko
2017-10-17 23:28 ` [PATCH 0/2] mm, thp: introduce dedicated transparent huge page allocation interfaces Andrew Morton
2017-10-18 11:02 ` Du, Changbin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20171017091638.GA7748@intel.com \
--to=changbin.du@intel.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=hughd@google.com \
--cc=khandual@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).