linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jerome Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com>
To: Balbir Singh <bsingharora@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Joerg Roedel <jroedel@suse.de>,
	Suravee Suthikulpanit <suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com>,
	David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>,
	Alistair Popple <alistair@popple.id.au>,
	Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
	Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
	Andrew Donnellan <andrew.donnellan@au1.ibm.com>,
	iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Optimize mmu_notifier->invalidate_range callback
Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2017 23:08:12 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171019030812.GB5246@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171019134319.1b856091@MiWiFi-R3-srv>

On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 01:43:19PM +1100, Balbir Singh wrote:
> On Mon, 16 Oct 2017 23:10:01 -0400
> jglisse@redhat.com wrote:
> 
> > From: Jerome Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com>
> > 
> > (Andrew you already have v1 in your queue of patch 1, patch 2 is new,
> >  i think you can drop it patch 1 v1 for v2, v2 is bit more conservative
> >  and i fixed typos)
> > 
> > All this only affect user of invalidate_range callback (at this time
> > CAPI arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/npu-dma.c, IOMMU ATS/PASID in
> > drivers/iommu/amd_iommu_v2.c|intel-svm.c)
> > 
> > This patchset remove useless double call to mmu_notifier->invalidate_range
> > callback wherever it is safe to do so. The first patch just remove useless
> > call
> 
> As in an extra call? Where does that come from?

Before this patch you had the following pattern:
  mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_start();
  take_page_table_lock()
  ...
  update_page_table()
  mmu_notifier_invalidate_range()
  ...
  drop_page_table_lock()
  mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_end();

It happens that mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_end() also make an
unconditional call to mmu_notifier_invalidate_range() so in the
above scenario you had 2 calls to mmu_notifier_invalidate_range()

Obviously one of the 2 call is useless. In some case you can drop
the first call (under the page table lock) this is what patch 1
does.

In other cases you can drop the second call that happen inside
mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_end() that is what patch 2 does.

Hence why i am referring to useless double call. I have added
more documentation to explain all this in the code and also under
Documentation/vm/mmu_notifier.txt


> 
> > and add documentation explaining why it is safe to do so. The second
> > patch go further by introducing mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_only_end()
> > which skip callback to invalidate_range this can be done when clearing a
> > pte, pmd or pud with notification which call invalidate_range right after
> > clearing under the page table lock.
> >
> 
> Balbir Singh.
> 

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

      reply	other threads:[~2017-10-19  3:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-10-17  3:10 [PATCH 0/2] Optimize mmu_notifier->invalidate_range callback jglisse
2017-10-17  3:10 ` [PATCH 1/2] mm/mmu_notifier: avoid double notification when it is useless v2 jglisse
2017-10-19  3:04   ` Balbir Singh
2017-10-19  3:28     ` Jerome Glisse
2017-10-19 10:53       ` Balbir Singh
2017-10-19 16:58         ` Jerome Glisse
2017-10-21  5:54           ` Balbir Singh
2017-10-21 15:47             ` Jerome Glisse
2017-10-23 20:35               ` Jerome Glisse
2017-10-17  3:10 ` [PATCH 2/2] mm/mmu_notifier: avoid call to invalidate_range() in range_end() jglisse
2017-10-19  2:43 ` [PATCH 0/2] Optimize mmu_notifier->invalidate_range callback Balbir Singh
2017-10-19  3:08   ` Jerome Glisse [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20171019030812.GB5246@redhat.com \
    --to=jglisse@redhat.com \
    --cc=aarcange@redhat.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=alistair@popple.id.au \
    --cc=andrew.donnellan@au1.ibm.com \
    --cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
    --cc=bsingharora@gmail.com \
    --cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
    --cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=jroedel@suse.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
    --cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
    --cc=suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).