From: Jerome Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com>
To: Balbir Singh <bsingharora@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Joerg Roedel <jroedel@suse.de>,
Suravee Suthikulpanit <suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>,
Alistair Popple <alistair@popple.id.au>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
Andrew Donnellan <andrew.donnellan@au1.ibm.com>,
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Optimize mmu_notifier->invalidate_range callback
Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2017 23:08:12 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171019030812.GB5246@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171019134319.1b856091@MiWiFi-R3-srv>
On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 01:43:19PM +1100, Balbir Singh wrote:
> On Mon, 16 Oct 2017 23:10:01 -0400
> jglisse@redhat.com wrote:
>
> > From: Jerome Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com>
> >
> > (Andrew you already have v1 in your queue of patch 1, patch 2 is new,
> > i think you can drop it patch 1 v1 for v2, v2 is bit more conservative
> > and i fixed typos)
> >
> > All this only affect user of invalidate_range callback (at this time
> > CAPI arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/npu-dma.c, IOMMU ATS/PASID in
> > drivers/iommu/amd_iommu_v2.c|intel-svm.c)
> >
> > This patchset remove useless double call to mmu_notifier->invalidate_range
> > callback wherever it is safe to do so. The first patch just remove useless
> > call
>
> As in an extra call? Where does that come from?
Before this patch you had the following pattern:
mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_start();
take_page_table_lock()
...
update_page_table()
mmu_notifier_invalidate_range()
...
drop_page_table_lock()
mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_end();
It happens that mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_end() also make an
unconditional call to mmu_notifier_invalidate_range() so in the
above scenario you had 2 calls to mmu_notifier_invalidate_range()
Obviously one of the 2 call is useless. In some case you can drop
the first call (under the page table lock) this is what patch 1
does.
In other cases you can drop the second call that happen inside
mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_end() that is what patch 2 does.
Hence why i am referring to useless double call. I have added
more documentation to explain all this in the code and also under
Documentation/vm/mmu_notifier.txt
>
> > and add documentation explaining why it is safe to do so. The second
> > patch go further by introducing mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_only_end()
> > which skip callback to invalidate_range this can be done when clearing a
> > pte, pmd or pud with notification which call invalidate_range right after
> > clearing under the page table lock.
> >
>
> Balbir Singh.
>
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-10-19 3:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-10-17 3:10 [PATCH 0/2] Optimize mmu_notifier->invalidate_range callback jglisse
2017-10-17 3:10 ` [PATCH 1/2] mm/mmu_notifier: avoid double notification when it is useless v2 jglisse
2017-10-19 3:04 ` Balbir Singh
2017-10-19 3:28 ` Jerome Glisse
2017-10-19 10:53 ` Balbir Singh
2017-10-19 16:58 ` Jerome Glisse
2017-10-21 5:54 ` Balbir Singh
2017-10-21 15:47 ` Jerome Glisse
2017-10-23 20:35 ` Jerome Glisse
2017-10-17 3:10 ` [PATCH 2/2] mm/mmu_notifier: avoid call to invalidate_range() in range_end() jglisse
2017-10-19 2:43 ` [PATCH 0/2] Optimize mmu_notifier->invalidate_range callback Balbir Singh
2017-10-19 3:08 ` Jerome Glisse [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20171019030812.GB5246@redhat.com \
--to=jglisse@redhat.com \
--cc=aarcange@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=alistair@popple.id.au \
--cc=andrew.donnellan@au1.ibm.com \
--cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=bsingharora@gmail.com \
--cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=jroedel@suse.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
--cc=suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).