From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>,
"Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
kernel-team@fb.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] mm: show total hugetlb memory consumption in /proc/meminfo
Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2017 16:51:10 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171120165110.587918bf75ffecb8144da66c@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171115231409.12131-1-guro@fb.com>
On Wed, 15 Nov 2017 23:14:09 +0000 Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com> wrote:
> Currently we display some hugepage statistics (total, free, etc)
> in /proc/meminfo, but only for default hugepage size (e.g. 2Mb).
>
> If hugepages of different sizes are used (like 2Mb and 1Gb on x86-64),
> /proc/meminfo output can be confusing, as non-default sized hugepages
> are not reflected at all, and there are no signs that they are
> existing and consuming system memory.
>
> To solve this problem, let's display the total amount of memory,
> consumed by hugetlb pages of all sized (both free and used).
> Let's call it "Hugetlb", and display size in kB to match generic
> /proc/meminfo style.
>
> For example, (1024 2Mb pages and 2 1Gb pages are pre-allocated):
> $ cat /proc/meminfo
> MemTotal: 8168984 kB
> MemFree: 3789276 kB
> <...>
> CmaFree: 0 kB
> HugePages_Total: 1024
> HugePages_Free: 1024
> HugePages_Rsvd: 0
> HugePages_Surp: 0
> Hugepagesize: 2048 kB
> Hugetlb: 4194304 kB
> DirectMap4k: 32632 kB
> DirectMap2M: 4161536 kB
> DirectMap1G: 6291456 kB
>
> Also, this patch updates corresponding docs to reflect
> Hugetlb entry meaning and difference between Hugetlb and
> HugePages_Total * Hugepagesize.
>
> ...
>
> --- a/mm/hugetlb.c
> +++ b/mm/hugetlb.c
> @@ -2973,20 +2973,32 @@ int hugetlb_overcommit_handler(struct ctl_table *table, int write,
>
> void hugetlb_report_meminfo(struct seq_file *m)
> {
> - struct hstate *h = &default_hstate;
> + struct hstate *h;
> + unsigned long total = 0;
> +
> if (!hugepages_supported())
> return;
> - seq_printf(m,
> - "HugePages_Total: %5lu\n"
> - "HugePages_Free: %5lu\n"
> - "HugePages_Rsvd: %5lu\n"
> - "HugePages_Surp: %5lu\n"
> - "Hugepagesize: %8lu kB\n",
> - h->nr_huge_pages,
> - h->free_huge_pages,
> - h->resv_huge_pages,
> - h->surplus_huge_pages,
> - 1UL << (huge_page_order(h) + PAGE_SHIFT - 10));
> +
> + for_each_hstate(h) {
> + unsigned long count = h->nr_huge_pages;
> +
> + total += (PAGE_SIZE << huge_page_order(h)) * count;
> +
> + if (h == &default_hstate)
I'm not understanding this test. Are we assuming that default_hstate
always refers to the highest-index hstate? If so why, and is that
valid?
> + seq_printf(m,
> + "HugePages_Total: %5lu\n"
> + "HugePages_Free: %5lu\n"
> + "HugePages_Rsvd: %5lu\n"
> + "HugePages_Surp: %5lu\n"
> + "Hugepagesize: %8lu kB\n",
> + count,
> + h->free_huge_pages,
> + h->resv_huge_pages,
> + h->surplus_huge_pages,
> + (PAGE_SIZE << huge_page_order(h)) / 1024);
> + }
> +
> + seq_printf(m, "Hugetlb: %8lu kB\n", total / 1024);
> }
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-11-21 0:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-11-15 23:14 [PATCH v2] mm: show total hugetlb memory consumption in /proc/meminfo Roman Gushchin
2017-11-16 9:11 ` Michal Hocko
2017-11-16 14:22 ` Johannes Weiner
2017-11-17 9:41 ` David Rientjes
2017-11-21 0:51 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2017-11-21 1:09 ` Mike Kravetz
2017-11-21 7:01 ` Michal Hocko
2017-11-21 15:15 ` Roman Gushchin
2017-11-21 19:19 ` Andrew Morton
2017-11-21 19:59 ` Roman Gushchin
2017-11-22 0:27 ` Mike Kravetz
2017-11-22 9:10 ` Michal Hocko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20171120165110.587918bf75ffecb8144da66c@linux-foundation.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=aarcange@redhat.com \
--cc=aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=dave.hansen@intel.com \
--cc=guro@fb.com \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=mike.kravetz@oracle.com \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).