From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-pg0-f70.google.com (mail-pg0-f70.google.com [74.125.83.70]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 554A36B0069 for ; Tue, 19 Dec 2017 11:58:39 -0500 (EST) Received: by mail-pg0-f70.google.com with SMTP id w5so12882963pgt.4 for ; Tue, 19 Dec 2017 08:58:39 -0800 (PST) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org. [65.50.211.133]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id l5si10313357pgr.469.2017.12.19.08.58.37 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Tue, 19 Dec 2017 08:58:38 -0800 (PST) From: Matthew Wilcox Subject: [PATCH 2/2] Introduce __cond_lock_err Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2017 08:58:23 -0800 Message-Id: <20171219165823.24243-2-willy@infradead.org> In-Reply-To: <20171219165823.24243-1-willy@infradead.org> References: <20171219165823.24243-1-willy@infradead.org> Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ross Zwisler , Dave Hansen , linux-mm@kvack.org, Josh Triplett Cc: Matthew Wilcox From: Matthew Wilcox The __cond_lock macro expects the function to return 'true' if the lock was acquired and 'false' if it wasn't. We have another common calling convention in the kernel, which is returning 0 on success and an errno on failure. It's hard to use the existing __cond_lock macro for those kinds of functions, so introduce __cond_lock_err() and convert the two existing users. Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox --- include/linux/compiler_types.h | 2 ++ include/linux/mm.h | 9 ++------- mm/memory.c | 9 ++------- 3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-) diff --git a/include/linux/compiler_types.h b/include/linux/compiler_types.h index 6b79a9bba9a7..ff3c41c78efa 100644 --- a/include/linux/compiler_types.h +++ b/include/linux/compiler_types.h @@ -16,6 +16,7 @@ # define __acquire(x) __context__(x,1) # define __release(x) __context__(x,-1) # define __cond_lock(x,c) ((c) ? ({ __acquire(x); 1; }) : 0) +# define __cond_lock_err(x,c) ((c) ? 1 : ({ __acquire(x); 0; })) # define __percpu __attribute__((noderef, address_space(3))) # define __rcu __attribute__((noderef, address_space(4))) # define __private __attribute__((noderef)) @@ -42,6 +43,7 @@ extern void __chk_io_ptr(const volatile void __iomem *); # define __acquire(x) (void)0 # define __release(x) (void)0 # define __cond_lock(x,c) (c) +# define __cond_lock_err(x,c) (c) # define __percpu # define __rcu # define __private diff --git a/include/linux/mm.h b/include/linux/mm.h index 94a9d2149bd6..2ccdc980296b 100644 --- a/include/linux/mm.h +++ b/include/linux/mm.h @@ -1328,13 +1328,8 @@ static inline int follow_pte_pmd(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long address, unsigned long *start, unsigned long *end, pte_t **ptepp, pmd_t **pmdpp, spinlock_t **ptlp) { - int res; - - /* (void) is needed to make gcc happy */ - (void) __cond_lock(*ptlp, - !(res = __follow_pte_pmd(mm, address, start, end, - ptepp, pmdpp, ptlp))); - return res; + return __cond_lock_err(*ptlp, __follow_pte_pmd(mm, address, start, end, + ptepp, pmdpp, ptlp)); } static inline void unmap_shared_mapping_range(struct address_space *mapping, diff --git a/mm/memory.c b/mm/memory.c index cb433662af21..92d58309cf45 100644 --- a/mm/memory.c +++ b/mm/memory.c @@ -4269,13 +4269,8 @@ int __follow_pte_pmd(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long address, static inline int follow_pte(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long address, pte_t **ptepp, spinlock_t **ptlp) { - int res; - - /* (void) is needed to make gcc happy */ - (void) __cond_lock(*ptlp, - !(res = __follow_pte_pmd(mm, address, NULL, NULL, - ptepp, NULL, ptlp))); - return res; + return __cond_lock_err(*ptlp, __follow_pte_pmd(mm, address, NULL, NULL, + ptepp, NULL, ptlp)); } /** -- 2.15.1 -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org