linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
Cc: Rao Shoaib <rao.shoaib@oracle.com>,
	Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, brouer@redhat.com,
	linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] Move kfree_call_rcu() to slab_common.c
Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2018 15:47:32 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180104234732.GM9671@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180104231307.GA794@bombadil.infradead.org>

On Thu, Jan 04, 2018 at 03:13:07PM -0800, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 04, 2018 at 02:18:50PM -0800, Rao Shoaib wrote:
> > > > > > +#define kfree_rcu(ptr, rcu_head_name) \
> > > > > > +    do { \
> > > > > > +        typeof(ptr) __ptr = ptr;    \
> > > > > > +        unsigned long __off = offsetof(typeof(*(__ptr)), \
> > > > > > +                              rcu_head_name); \
> > > > > > +        struct rcu_head *__rptr = (void *)__ptr + __off; \
> > > > > > +        __kfree_rcu(__rptr, __off); \
> > > > > > +    } while (0)
> > > > > why do you want to open code this?
> > > But why are you changing this macro at all?  If it was to avoid the
> > > double-mention of "ptr", then you haven't done that.
> > I have -- I do not get the error because ptr is being assigned only one. If
> > you have a better way than let me know and I will be happy to make the
> > change.
> 
> But look at the original:
> 
> #define kfree_rcu(ptr, rcu_head)                                        \
>         __kfree_rcu(&((ptr)->rcu_head), offsetof(typeof(*(ptr)), rcu_head))
>                        ^^^                                ^^^
> 
> versus your version:
> 
> +#define kfree_rcu(ptr, rcu_head_name) \
> +    do { \
> +        typeof(ptr) __ptr = ptr;    \
>                 ^^^          ^^^
> +        unsigned long __off = offsetof(typeof(*(__ptr)), \
> +                              rcu_head_name); \
> +        struct rcu_head *__rptr = (void *)__ptr + __off; \
> +        __kfree_rcu(__rptr, __off); \
> +    } while (0)
> 
> I don't see the difference.

I was under the impression that typeof did not actually evaluate its
argument, but rather only returned its type.  And there are a few macros
with this pattern in mainline.

Or am I confused about what typeof does?

							Thanx, Paul

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2018-01-04 23:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-01-02 20:11 [PATCH 1/2] Move kfree_call_rcu() to slab_common.c rao.shoaib
2018-01-02 20:11 ` [PATCH 2/2] kfree_rcu() should use the new kfree_bulk() interface for freeing rcu structures rao.shoaib
2018-01-02 22:23 ` [PATCH 1/2] Move kfree_call_rcu() to slab_common.c Matthew Wilcox
2018-01-02 22:49   ` Rao Shoaib
2018-01-04  1:38     ` Boqun Feng
2018-01-04 20:35       ` Rao Shoaib
2018-01-04 21:27         ` Rao Shoaib
2018-01-04 21:46           ` Matthew Wilcox
2018-01-04 22:18             ` Rao Shoaib
2018-01-04 23:13               ` Matthew Wilcox
2018-01-04 23:47                 ` Paul E. McKenney [this message]
2018-01-05  0:07                   ` Matthew Wilcox
2018-01-05  2:14                     ` Rao Shoaib
2018-01-05  6:46                     ` Joe Perches
2018-03-27  1:56                       ` Rao Shoaib
2018-03-27  2:06                         ` Joe Perches
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2018-04-02  5:31 [PATCH 0/2] Move kfree_rcu out of rcu code and use kfree_bulk rao.shoaib
2018-04-02  5:31 ` [PATCH 1/2] Move kfree_call_rcu() to slab_common.c rao.shoaib
2018-04-02  7:59   ` kbuild test robot
2018-04-02  9:45   ` kbuild test robot
2018-04-02 15:43     ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-04-03 17:22 [PATCH 0/2] Move kfree_rcu out of rcu code and use kfree_bulk rao.shoaib
2018-04-03 17:22 ` [PATCH 1/2] Move kfree_call_rcu() to slab_common.c rao.shoaib

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180104234732.GM9671@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --to=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
    --cc=brouer@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=rao.shoaib@oracle.com \
    --cc=willy@infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).