From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-qk0-f197.google.com (mail-qk0-f197.google.com [209.85.220.197]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1CA0D6B0009 for ; Wed, 7 Feb 2018 23:09:27 -0500 (EST) Received: by mail-qk0-f197.google.com with SMTP id q185so2769091qke.2 for ; Wed, 07 Feb 2018 20:09:27 -0800 (PST) Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com. [148.163.156.1]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id y54si872373qth.38.2018.02.07.20.09.26 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 07 Feb 2018 20:09:26 -0800 (PST) Received: from pps.filterd (m0098394.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.22/8.16.0.22) with SMTP id w1849LFP022143 for ; Wed, 7 Feb 2018 23:09:25 -0500 Received: from e13.ny.us.ibm.com (e13.ny.us.ibm.com [129.33.205.203]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2g0dm3u5da-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Wed, 07 Feb 2018 23:09:25 -0500 Received: from localhost by e13.ny.us.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Wed, 7 Feb 2018 23:09:24 -0500 Date: Wed, 7 Feb 2018 20:09:29 -0800 From: "Paul E. McKenney" Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] rcu: Transform kfree_rcu() into kvfree_rcu() Reply-To: paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com References: <151791170164.5994.8253310844733420079.stgit@localhost.localdomain> <20180207021703.GC3617@linux.vnet.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Message-Id: <20180208040929.GQ3617@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: Christopher Lameter Cc: Kirill Tkhai , josh@joshtriplett.org, rostedt@goodmis.org, mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com, jiangshanlai@gmail.com, mingo@redhat.com, penberg@kernel.org, rientjes@google.com, iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, brouer@redhat.com, rao.shoaib@oracle.com On Wed, Feb 07, 2018 at 08:55:47AM -0600, Christopher Lameter wrote: > On Tue, 6 Feb 2018, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > > > So it is OK to kvmalloc() something and pass it to either kfree() or > > kvfree(), and it had better be OK to kvmalloc() something and pass it > > to kvfree(). > > kvfree() is fine but not kfree(). Ah, even more fun, then! ;-) Thanx, Paul -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org