From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-pg0-f72.google.com (mail-pg0-f72.google.com [74.125.83.72]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3094D6B0006 for ; Mon, 26 Mar 2018 19:15:41 -0400 (EDT) Received: by mail-pg0-f72.google.com with SMTP id v8so10180292pgs.9 for ; Mon, 26 Mar 2018 16:15:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-sor-f41.google.com (mail-sor-f41.google.com. [209.85.220.41]) by mx.google.com with SMTPS id w26sor4196190pge.69.2018.03.26.16.15.39 for (Google Transport Security); Mon, 26 Mar 2018 16:15:39 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2018 07:15:31 +0800 From: Wei Yang Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] mm/sparse: pass the __highest_present_section_nr + 1 to alloc_func() Message-ID: <20180326231531.GA79994@WeideMacBook-Pro.local> Reply-To: Wei Yang References: <20180326081956.75275-1-richard.weiyang@gmail.com> <20180326223034.GA78976@WeideMacBook-Pro.local> <20180326225621.GA79778@WeideMacBook-Pro.local> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: David Rientjes Cc: Wei Yang , dave.hansen@linux.intel.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, mhocko@suse.com, linux-mm@kvack.org On Mon, Mar 26, 2018 at 03:58:28PM -0700, David Rientjes wrote: >On Tue, 27 Mar 2018, Wei Yang wrote: > >> >Lol. I think it would make more sense for the second patch to come before >> >the first >> >> Thanks for your comment. >> >> Do I need to reorder the patch and send v2? >> > >I think we can just ask Andrew to apply backwards, but it's not crucial. >The ordering of patch 2 before patch 1 simply helped me to understand the >boundaries better. Ah, got it. Actually, the original order is what you expected. While for some mysterious reasons, I reordered them :-( Maybe you are right, it would be more easy to understand with patch 2 before patch 1. :-) Have a good day~ -- Wei Yang Help you, Help me