From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: "Dave Hansen" <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
"Linus Torvalds" <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
"Linux Kernel Mailing List" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-mm <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
"Andrea Arcangeli" <aarcange@redhat.com>,
"Andrew Lutomirski" <luto@kernel.org>,
"Kees Cook" <keescook@google.com>,
"Hugh Dickins" <hughd@google.com>,
"Jürgen Groß" <jgross@suse.com>,
"the arch/x86 maintainers" <x86@kernel.org>,
namit@vmware.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/11] Use global pages with PTI
Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2018 22:07:19 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180327200719.lvdomez6hszpmo4s@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.21.1803271949250.1618@nanos.tec.linutronix.de>
* Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> wrote:
> > systems. Atoms are going to be the easiest thing to get my hands on,
> > but I tend to shy away from them for performance work.
>
> What I have in mind is that I wonder whether the whole circus is worth it
> when there is no performance advantage on PCID systems.
I'd still love to:
- To see at minimum stddev numbers, to make sure we are not looking at some weird
statistical artifact. (I also outlined a more robust measurement method.)
- If the numbers are right, a CPU engineer should have a look if possible,
because frankly this effect is not expected and is not intuitive. Where global
pages can be used safely they are almost always an unconditional win.
Maybe we are missing some limitation or some interaction with PCID.
Since we'll be using PCID even on Meltdown-fixed hardware, maybe the same negative
performance effect already exists on non-PTI kernels as well, we just never
noticed?
I.e. there are multiple grounds to get to the bottom of this.
Thanks,
Ingo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-03-27 20:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-03-23 17:44 [PATCH 00/11] Use global pages with PTI Dave Hansen
2018-03-23 17:44 ` [PATCH 01/11] x86/mm: factor out pageattr _PAGE_GLOBAL setting Dave Hansen
2018-03-23 17:44 ` [PATCH 02/11] x86/mm: undo double _PAGE_PSE clearing Dave Hansen
2018-03-23 17:44 ` [PATCH 03/11] x86/mm: introduce "default" kernel PTE mask Dave Hansen
2018-03-23 17:44 ` [PATCH 04/11] x86/espfix: document use of _PAGE_GLOBAL Dave Hansen
2018-03-23 17:44 ` [PATCH 05/11] x86/mm: do not auto-massage page protections Dave Hansen
2018-03-23 19:15 ` Nadav Amit
2018-03-23 19:26 ` Dave Hansen
2018-03-23 19:34 ` Nadav Amit
2018-03-23 19:38 ` Dave Hansen
2018-03-24 15:10 ` kbuild test robot
2018-03-24 15:21 ` kbuild test robot
2018-03-23 17:44 ` [PATCH 06/11] x86/mm: remove extra filtering in pageattr code Dave Hansen
2018-03-23 17:44 ` [PATCH 07/11] x86/mm: comment _PAGE_GLOBAL mystery Dave Hansen
2018-03-23 17:44 ` [PATCH 08/11] x86/mm: do not forbid _PAGE_RW before init for __ro_after_init Dave Hansen
2018-03-23 17:45 ` [PATCH 09/11] x86/pti: enable global pages for shared areas Dave Hansen
2018-03-23 19:12 ` Nadav Amit
2018-03-23 19:36 ` Dave Hansen
2018-03-23 17:45 ` [PATCH 10/11] x86/pti: clear _PAGE_GLOBAL for kernel image Dave Hansen
2018-03-23 17:45 ` [PATCH 11/11] x86/pti: leave kernel text global for !PCID Dave Hansen
2018-03-23 18:26 ` [PATCH 00/11] Use global pages with PTI Linus Torvalds
2018-03-24 0:40 ` Dave Hansen
2018-03-24 0:46 ` Linus Torvalds
2018-03-24 0:54 ` Linus Torvalds
2018-03-24 11:05 ` Ingo Molnar
2018-03-27 13:36 ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-03-27 16:32 ` Dave Hansen
2018-03-27 17:51 ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-03-27 20:07 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2018-03-27 20:19 ` Dave Hansen
2018-03-29 0:17 ` Dave Hansen
2018-03-30 12:09 ` Ingo Molnar
2018-03-30 12:17 ` Ingo Molnar
2018-03-30 20:26 ` Dave Hansen
2018-03-30 20:32 ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-03-30 21:40 ` Dave Hansen
2018-03-31 5:39 ` Ingo Molnar
2018-03-31 18:19 ` Dave Hansen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180327200719.lvdomez6hszpmo4s@gmail.com \
--to=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=aarcange@redhat.com \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=hughd@google.com \
--cc=jgross@suse.com \
--cc=keescook@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=namit@vmware.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).