From: Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@gmail.com>
To: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Cc: Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@gmail.com>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/page_alloc: call set_pageblock_order() once for each node
Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2018 09:27:34 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180404012734.GA1841@WeideMacBook-Pro.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180403075737.GB5501@dhcp22.suse.cz>
On Tue, Apr 03, 2018 at 09:57:37AM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
>On Fri 30-03-18 09:02:43, Wei Yang wrote:
>> On Thu, Mar 29, 2018 at 01:11:09PM +0100, Mel Gorman wrote:
>> >On Thu, Mar 29, 2018 at 11:36:07AM +0800, Wei Yang wrote:
>> >> set_pageblock_order() is a standalone function which sets pageblock_order,
>> >> while current implementation calls this function on each ZONE of each node
>> >> in free_area_init_core().
>> >>
>> >> Since free_area_init_node() is the only user of free_area_init_core(),
>> >> this patch moves set_pageblock_order() up one level to invoke
>> >> set_pageblock_order() only once on each node.
>> >>
>> >> Signed-off-by: Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@gmail.com>
>> >
>> >The patch looks ok but given that set_pageblock_order returns immediately
>> >if it has already been called, I expect the benefit is marginal. Was any
>> >improvement in boot time measured?
>>
>> No, I don't expect measurable improvement from this since the number of nodes
>> and zones are limited.
>>
>> This is just a code refine from logic point of view.
>
>Then, please make sure it is a real refinement. Calling this function
>per node is only half way to get there as the function is by no means
>per node.
>
Hi, Michal
I guess you are willing to see this function is only called once for the whole
system.
Yes, that is the ideal way, well I don't come up with an elegant way. The best
way is to move this to free_area_init_nodes(), while you can see not all arch
use this function.
Then I have two options:
A: Move this to free_area_init_nodes() for those arch using it. Call it
specifically for those arch not using free_area_init_nodes().
B: call it before setup_arch() in start_kernel()
Hmm... which one you would prefer? If you have a better idea, that would be
great.
>--
>Michal Hocko
>SUSE Labs
--
Wei Yang
Help you, Help me
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-04-04 1:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-03-29 3:36 [PATCH] mm/page_alloc: call set_pageblock_order() once for each node Wei Yang
2018-03-29 12:11 ` Mel Gorman
2018-03-30 1:02 ` Wei Yang
2018-04-03 7:57 ` Michal Hocko
2018-04-04 1:27 ` Wei Yang [this message]
2018-04-05 9:55 ` Michal Hocko
2018-04-06 1:46 ` Wei Yang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180404012734.GA1841@WeideMacBook-Pro.local \
--to=richard.weiyang@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).