From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-pl0-f69.google.com (mail-pl0-f69.google.com [209.85.160.69]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9CB26B0009 for ; Tue, 10 Apr 2018 02:27:47 -0400 (EDT) Received: by mail-pl0-f69.google.com with SMTP id az8-v6so4379151plb.2 for ; Mon, 09 Apr 2018 23:27:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mx2.suse.de (mx2.suse.de. [195.135.220.15]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id f64-v6si2013592plf.624.2018.04.09.23.27.46 for (version=TLS1 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Mon, 09 Apr 2018 23:27:46 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2018 08:27:45 +0200 From: Hannes Reinecke Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/7] block: use GFP_NOIO instead of __GFP_DIRECT_RECLAIM Message-ID: <20180410082745.5b84ef48@pentland.suse.de> In-Reply-To: <20180409153916.23901-6-hch@lst.de> References: <20180409153916.23901-1-hch@lst.de> <20180409153916.23901-6-hch@lst.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: axboe@kernel.dk, Bart.VanAssche@wdc.com, willy@infradead.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org On Mon, 9 Apr 2018 17:39:14 +0200 Christoph Hellwig wrote: > We just can't do I/O when doing block layer requests allocations, > so use GFP_NOIO instead of the even more limited __GFP_DIRECT_RECLAIM. > > Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig > --- > block/blk-core.c | 5 ++--- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > Reviewed-by: Hannes Reinecke Cheers, Hannes