From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wr0-f199.google.com (mail-wr0-f199.google.com [209.85.128.199]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64B336B0286 for ; Mon, 16 Apr 2018 11:30:34 -0400 (EDT) Received: by mail-wr0-f199.google.com with SMTP id z7so2802460wrg.11 for ; Mon, 16 Apr 2018 08:30:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: from atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz (atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz. [195.113.26.193]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id t80si691305wrc.72.2018.04.16.08.30.32 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 16 Apr 2018 08:30:33 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2018 17:30:31 +0200 From: Pavel Machek Subject: Re: [PATCH AUTOSEL for 4.14 015/161] printk: Add console owner and waiter logic to load balance console writes Message-ID: <20180416153031.GA5039@amd> References: <20180409001936.162706-1-alexander.levin@microsoft.com> <20180409001936.162706-15-alexander.levin@microsoft.com> <20180409082246.34hgp3ymkfqke3a4@pathway.suse.cz> <20180415144248.GP2341@sasha-vm> <20180416093058.6edca0bb@gandalf.local.home> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="huq684BweRXVnRxX" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: Linus Torvalds Cc: Steven Rostedt , Sasha Levin , Petr Mladek , "stable@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "akpm@linux-foundation.org" , "linux-mm@kvack.org" , Cong Wang , Dave Hansen , Johannes Weiner , Mel Gorman , Michal Hocko , Vlastimil Babka , Peter Zijlstra , Jan Kara , Mathieu Desnoyers , Tetsuo Handa , Byungchul Park , Tejun Heo --huq684BweRXVnRxX Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon 2018-04-16 08:18:09, Linus Torvalds wrote: > On Mon, Apr 16, 2018 at 6:30 AM, Steven Rostedt wro= te: > > > > I wonder if the "AUTOSEL" patches should at least have an "ack-by" from > > someone before they are pulled in. Otherwise there may be some subtle > > issues that can find their way into stable releases. >=20 > I don't know about anybody else, but I get so many of the patch-bot > patches for stable etc that I will *not* reply to normal cases. Only > if there's some issue with a patch will I reply. >=20 > I probably do get more than most, but still - requiring active > participation for the steady flow of normal stable patches is almost > pointless. >=20 > Just look at the subject line of this thread. The numbers are so big > that you almost need exponential notation for them. Question is if we need that many stable patches? Autosel seems to be picking up race conditions in LED state and W+X page fixes... I'd really like to see less stable patches. Pavel --=20 (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blo= g.html --huq684BweRXVnRxX Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iEYEARECAAYFAlrUwZcACgkQMOfwapXb+vLyugCeOGD9Ww5IgWnSxK5d1h1gXSkk t8YAnjd3az8WOw1SK0e59lD4Pm85BLVw =4wFd -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --huq684BweRXVnRxX--