linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
To: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Cc: Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@lip6.fr>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Matthew Wilcox <mawilcox@microsoft.com>,
	Linux-MM <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Kernel Hardening <kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com>,
	cocci@systeme.lip6.fr, Himanshu Jha <himanshujha199640@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] mm: Add kvmalloc_ab_c and kvzalloc_struct
Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2018 13:30:23 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180429203023.GA11891@bombadil.infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAGXu5jKLaY2vzeFNaEhZOXbMgDXp4nF4=BnGCFfHFRwL6LXNHA@mail.gmail.com>

On Sun, Apr 29, 2018 at 09:59:27AM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> Did this ever happen?

Not yet.  I brought it up at LSFMM, and I'll repost the patches soon.

> I'd also like to see kmalloc_array_3d() or
> something that takes three size arguments. We have a lot of this
> pattern too:
> 
> kmalloc(sizeof(foo) * A * B, gfp...)
> 
> And we could turn that into:
> 
> kmalloc_array_3d(sizeof(foo), A, B, gfp...)

Are either of A or B constant?  Because if so, we could just use
kmalloc_array.  If not, then kmalloc_array_3d becomes a little more
expensive than kmalloc_array because we have to do a divide at runtime
instead of compile-time.  that's still better than allocating too few
bytes, of course.

I'm wondering how far down the abc + ab + ac + bc + d rabbit-hole we're
going to end up going.  As far as we have to, I guess.

  reply	other threads:[~2018-04-29 20:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-02-14 18:26 [PATCH 0/2] Add kvzalloc_struct to complement kvzalloc_array Matthew Wilcox
2018-02-14 18:26 ` [PATCH 1/2] mm: Add kernel-doc for kvfree Matthew Wilcox
2018-02-14 18:26 ` [PATCH 2/2] mm: Add kvmalloc_ab_c and kvzalloc_struct Matthew Wilcox
2018-02-14 19:22   ` Kees Cook
2018-02-14 19:27     ` Julia Lawall
2018-02-14 19:35     ` Matthew Wilcox
2018-03-07 21:18     ` Julia Lawall
2018-03-08  2:58       ` Matthew Wilcox
2018-03-08  6:24         ` Julia Lawall
2018-03-08 23:05           ` Matthew Wilcox
2018-03-09  5:59             ` Julia Lawall
2018-03-13 17:19             ` Julia Lawall
2018-03-13 18:32               ` Matthew Wilcox
2018-03-13 18:35                 ` Julia Lawall
2018-04-29 16:59                 ` Kees Cook
2018-04-29 20:30                   ` Matthew Wilcox [this message]
2018-04-30 19:02                     ` Kees Cook
2018-04-30 20:16                       ` Matthew Wilcox
2018-04-30 21:29                         ` Rasmus Villemoes
2018-04-30 22:41                           ` Matthew Wilcox
2018-05-01 17:00                           ` Kees Cook
2018-05-01 17:41                             ` Julia Lawall
2018-05-03 23:00                             ` Rasmus Villemoes
2018-05-04  0:36                               ` Kees Cook
2018-05-04  0:40                                 ` Kees Cook
2018-04-30 22:29                         ` Kees Cook
2018-02-14 19:55   ` Christopher Lameter
2018-02-14 20:14     ` Matthew Wilcox
2018-02-15 15:55       ` Christopher Lameter
2018-02-15 16:23         ` Matthew Wilcox
2018-02-15 17:06           ` Christopher Lameter
2018-02-22  1:28             ` Kees Cook
2018-05-04  7:42   ` Linus Torvalds
2018-05-04 13:14     ` Matthew Wilcox
2018-05-04 15:35       ` Linus Torvalds
2018-05-04 16:03         ` Kees Cook
2018-02-14 18:47 ` [PATCH 0/2] Add kvzalloc_struct to complement kvzalloc_array Joe Perches
2018-02-14 19:23   ` Kees Cook
2018-02-14 19:32     ` Joe Perches
2018-02-14 19:36       ` Matthew Wilcox
2018-02-14 19:43         ` Joe Perches
2018-02-14 19:56           ` Matthew Wilcox
2018-02-14 20:06             ` Joe Perches

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180429203023.GA11891@bombadil.infradead.org \
    --to=willy@infradead.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=cocci@systeme.lip6.fr \
    --cc=himanshujha199640@gmail.com \
    --cc=julia.lawall@lip6.fr \
    --cc=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mawilcox@microsoft.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).