From: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov.dev@gmail.com>
To: Kirill Tkhai <ktkhai@virtuozzo.com>
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, shakeelb@google.com,
viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, hannes@cmpxchg.org, mhocko@kernel.org,
tglx@linutronix.de, pombredanne@nexb.com,
stummala@codeaurora.org, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org,
sfr@canb.auug.org.au, guro@fb.com, mka@chromium.org,
penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp, chris@chris-wilson.co.uk,
longman@redhat.com, minchan@kernel.org, ying.huang@intel.com,
mgorman@techsingularity.net, jbacik@fb.com, linux@roeck-us.net,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
willy@infradead.org, lirongqing@baidu.com,
aryabinin@virtuozzo.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 11/13] mm: Iterate only over charged shrinkers during memcg shrink_slab()
Date: Tue, 15 May 2018 08:44:45 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180515054445.nhe4zigtelkois4p@esperanza> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <152594603565.22949.12428911301395699065.stgit@localhost.localdomain>
On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 12:53:55PM +0300, Kirill Tkhai wrote:
> Using the preparations made in previous patches, in case of memcg
> shrink, we may avoid shrinkers, which are not set in memcg's shrinkers
> bitmap. To do that, we separate iterations over memcg-aware and
> !memcg-aware shrinkers, and memcg-aware shrinkers are chosen
> via for_each_set_bit() from the bitmap. In case of big nodes,
> having many isolated environments, this gives significant
> performance growth. See next patches for the details.
>
> Note, that the patch does not respect to empty memcg shrinkers,
> since we never clear the bitmap bits after we set it once.
> Their shrinkers will be called again, with no shrinked objects
> as result. This functionality is provided by next patches.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kirill Tkhai <ktkhai@virtuozzo.com>
> ---
> include/linux/memcontrol.h | 1 +
> mm/vmscan.c | 70 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
> 2 files changed, 62 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/memcontrol.h b/include/linux/memcontrol.h
> index 82f892e77637..436691a66500 100644
> --- a/include/linux/memcontrol.h
> +++ b/include/linux/memcontrol.h
> @@ -760,6 +760,7 @@ void mem_cgroup_split_huge_fixup(struct page *head);
> #define MEM_CGROUP_ID_MAX 0
>
> struct mem_cgroup;
> +#define root_mem_cgroup NULL
Let's instead export mem_cgroup_is_root(). In case if MEMCG is disabled
it will always return false.
>
> static inline bool mem_cgroup_disabled(void)
> {
> diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
> index d8a2870710e0..a2e38e05adb5 100644
> --- a/mm/vmscan.c
> +++ b/mm/vmscan.c
> @@ -376,6 +376,7 @@ int prealloc_shrinker(struct shrinker *shrinker)
> goto free_deferred;
> }
>
> + INIT_LIST_HEAD(&shrinker->list);
IMO this shouldn't be here, see my comment below.
> return 0;
>
> free_deferred:
> @@ -547,6 +548,63 @@ static unsigned long do_shrink_slab(struct shrink_control *shrinkctl,
> return freed;
> }
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_MEMCG_SHRINKER
> +static unsigned long shrink_slab_memcg(gfp_t gfp_mask, int nid,
> + struct mem_cgroup *memcg, int priority)
> +{
> + struct memcg_shrinker_map *map;
> + unsigned long freed = 0;
> + int ret, i;
> +
> + if (!memcg_kmem_enabled() || !mem_cgroup_online(memcg))
> + return 0;
> +
> + if (!down_read_trylock(&shrinker_rwsem))
> + return 0;
> +
> + /*
> + * 1)Caller passes only alive memcg, so map can't be NULL.
> + * 2)shrinker_rwsem protects from maps expanding.
^^
Nit: space missing here :-)
> + */
> + map = rcu_dereference_protected(MEMCG_SHRINKER_MAP(memcg, nid), true);
> + BUG_ON(!map);
> +
> + for_each_set_bit(i, map->map, memcg_shrinker_nr_max) {
> + struct shrink_control sc = {
> + .gfp_mask = gfp_mask,
> + .nid = nid,
> + .memcg = memcg,
> + };
> + struct shrinker *shrinker;
> +
> + shrinker = idr_find(&shrinker_idr, i);
> + if (!shrinker) {
> + clear_bit(i, map->map);
> + continue;
> + }
The shrinker must be memcg aware so please add
BUG_ON((shrinker->flags & SHRINKER_MEMCG_AWARE) == 0);
> + if (list_empty(&shrinker->list))
> + continue;
I don't like using shrinker->list as an indicator that the shrinker has
been initialized. IMO if you do need such a check, you should split
shrinker_idr registration in two steps - allocate a slot in 'prealloc'
and set the pointer in 'register'. However, can we really encounter an
unregistered shrinker here? AFAIU a bit can be set in the shrinker map
only after the corresponding shrinker has been initialized, no?
> +
> + ret = do_shrink_slab(&sc, shrinker, priority);
> + freed += ret;
> +
> + if (rwsem_is_contended(&shrinker_rwsem)) {
> + freed = freed ? : 1;
> + break;
> + }
> + }
> +
> + up_read(&shrinker_rwsem);
> + return freed;
> +}
> +#else /* CONFIG_MEMCG_SHRINKER */
> +static unsigned long shrink_slab_memcg(gfp_t gfp_mask, int nid,
> + struct mem_cgroup *memcg, int priority)
> +{
> + return 0;
> +}
> +#endif /* CONFIG_MEMCG_SHRINKER */
> +
> /**
> * shrink_slab - shrink slab caches
> * @gfp_mask: allocation context
> @@ -576,8 +634,8 @@ static unsigned long shrink_slab(gfp_t gfp_mask, int nid,
> struct shrinker *shrinker;
> unsigned long freed = 0;
>
> - if (memcg && (!memcg_kmem_enabled() || !mem_cgroup_online(memcg)))
> - return 0;
> + if (memcg && memcg != root_mem_cgroup)
if (!mem_cgroup_is_root(memcg))
> + return shrink_slab_memcg(gfp_mask, nid, memcg, priority);
>
> if (!down_read_trylock(&shrinker_rwsem))
> goto out;
> @@ -589,13 +647,7 @@ static unsigned long shrink_slab(gfp_t gfp_mask, int nid,
> .memcg = memcg,
> };
>
> - /*
> - * If kernel memory accounting is disabled, we ignore
> - * SHRINKER_MEMCG_AWARE flag and call all shrinkers
> - * passing NULL for memcg.
> - */
> - if (memcg_kmem_enabled() &&
> - !!memcg != !!(shrinker->flags & SHRINKER_MEMCG_AWARE))
> + if (!!memcg != !!(shrinker->flags & SHRINKER_MEMCG_AWARE))
> continue;
I want this check gone. It's easy to achieve, actually - just remove the
following lines from shrink_node()
if (global_reclaim(sc))
shrink_slab(sc->gfp_mask, pgdat->node_id, NULL,
sc->priority);
>
> if (!(shrinker->flags & SHRINKER_NUMA_AWARE))
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-05-15 5:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-05-10 9:52 [PATCH v5 00/13] Improve shrink_slab() scalability (old complexity was O(n^2), new is O(n)) Kirill Tkhai
2018-05-10 9:52 ` [PATCH v5 01/13] mm: Assign id to every memcg-aware shrinker Kirill Tkhai
2018-05-13 5:15 ` Vladimir Davydov
2018-05-14 9:03 ` Kirill Tkhai
2018-05-15 3:29 ` Vladimir Davydov
2018-05-10 9:52 ` [PATCH v5 02/13] memcg: Move up for_each_mem_cgroup{, _tree} defines Kirill Tkhai
2018-05-10 9:52 ` [PATCH v5 03/13] mm: Assign memcg-aware shrinkers bitmap to memcg Kirill Tkhai
2018-05-13 16:47 ` Vladimir Davydov
2018-05-14 9:34 ` Kirill Tkhai
2018-05-15 3:54 ` Vladimir Davydov
2018-05-10 9:52 ` [PATCH v5 04/13] mm: Refactoring in workingset_init() Kirill Tkhai
2018-05-10 9:52 ` [PATCH v5 05/13] fs: Refactoring in alloc_super() Kirill Tkhai
2018-05-10 9:53 ` [PATCH v5 06/13] fs: Propagate shrinker::id to list_lru Kirill Tkhai
2018-05-13 16:57 ` Vladimir Davydov
2018-05-10 9:53 ` [PATCH v5 07/13] list_lru: Add memcg argument to list_lru_from_kmem() Kirill Tkhai
2018-05-10 9:53 ` [PATCH v5 08/13] list_lru: Pass dst_memcg argument to memcg_drain_list_lru_node() Kirill Tkhai
2018-05-10 9:53 ` [PATCH v5 09/13] list_lru: Pass lru " Kirill Tkhai
2018-05-10 9:53 ` [PATCH v5 10/13] mm: Set bit in memcg shrinker bitmap on first list_lru item apearance Kirill Tkhai
2018-05-15 4:08 ` Vladimir Davydov
2018-05-10 9:53 ` [PATCH v5 11/13] mm: Iterate only over charged shrinkers during memcg shrink_slab() Kirill Tkhai
2018-05-15 5:44 ` Vladimir Davydov [this message]
2018-05-15 10:12 ` Kirill Tkhai
2018-05-17 4:33 ` Vladimir Davydov
2018-05-17 11:39 ` Kirill Tkhai
2018-05-15 14:49 ` Kirill Tkhai
2018-05-17 4:16 ` Vladimir Davydov
2018-05-17 11:49 ` Kirill Tkhai
2018-05-17 13:51 ` Vladimir Davydov
2018-05-10 9:54 ` [PATCH v5 12/13] mm: Add SHRINK_EMPTY shrinker methods return value Kirill Tkhai
2018-05-10 9:54 ` [PATCH v5 13/13] mm: Clear shrinker bit if there are no objects related to memcg Kirill Tkhai
2018-05-15 5:59 ` Vladimir Davydov
2018-05-15 8:55 ` Kirill Tkhai
2018-05-17 4:49 ` Vladimir Davydov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180515054445.nhe4zigtelkois4p@esperanza \
--to=vdavydov.dev@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=aryabinin@virtuozzo.com \
--cc=chris@chris-wilson.co.uk \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=guro@fb.com \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=jbacik@fb.com \
--cc=ktkhai@virtuozzo.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux@roeck-us.net \
--cc=lirongqing@baidu.com \
--cc=longman@redhat.com \
--cc=mgorman@techsingularity.net \
--cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
--cc=minchan@kernel.org \
--cc=mka@chromium.org \
--cc=penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp \
--cc=pombredanne@nexb.com \
--cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
--cc=shakeelb@google.com \
--cc=stummala@codeaurora.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
--cc=ying.huang@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).