linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
To: Sinan Kaya <okaya@codeaurora.org>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, timur@codeaurora.org,
	linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/dmapool: localize page allocations
Date: Thu, 17 May 2018 12:46:12 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180517194612.GG26718@bombadil.infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9844a638-bc4e-46bd-133e-0c82a3e9d6ea@codeaurora.org>

On Thu, May 17, 2018 at 03:37:21PM -0400, Sinan Kaya wrote:
> On 5/17/2018 2:18 PM, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> > On Thu, May 17, 2018 at 01:36:19PM -0400, Sinan Kaya wrote:
> >> Try to keep the pool closer to the device's NUMA node by changing kmalloc()
> >> to kmalloc_node() and devres_alloc() to devres_alloc_node().
> > Have you measured any performance gains by doing this?  The thing is that
> > these allocations are for the metadata about the page, and the page is
> > going to be used by CPUs in every node.  So it's not clear to me that
> > allocating it on the node nearest to the device is going to be any sort
> > of a win.
> > 
> 
> It is true that this is metadata but it is one of the things that is most
> frequently used in spite of its small size.
> 
> I don't think it makes any sense to cross a chip boundary for accessing a
> pointer location on every single pool allocation. 
> 
> Remember that the CPU core that is running this driver is most probably on
> the same NUMA node as the device itself.

Umm ... says who?  If my process is running on NUMA node 5 and I submit
an I/O, it should be allocating from a pool on node 5, not from a pool
on whichever node the device is attached to.

If it actually makes a performance difference, then NVMe should allocate
one pool per queue, rather than one pool per device like it currently
does.

> Also, if it was a one time init kind of thing, I'd say "yeah, leave it alone". 
> DMA pool is used by a wide range of drivers and it is used to allocate
> fixed size buffers at runtime. 

 * DMA Pool allocator
 *
 * Copyright 2001 David Brownell
 * Copyright 2007 Intel Corporation
 *   Author: Matthew Wilcox <willy@linux.intel.com>

I know what it's used for.

  reply	other threads:[~2018-05-17 19:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-05-17 17:36 [PATCH] mm/dmapool: localize page allocations Sinan Kaya
2018-05-17 18:18 ` Matthew Wilcox
2018-05-17 19:37   ` Sinan Kaya
2018-05-17 19:46     ` Matthew Wilcox [this message]
2018-05-17 20:05       ` Sinan Kaya
2018-05-17 20:41         ` Matthew Wilcox
2018-05-17 21:05           ` Sinan Kaya

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180517194612.GG26718@bombadil.infradead.org \
    --to=willy@infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=okaya@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=timur@codeaurora.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).