From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-pg0-f71.google.com (mail-pg0-f71.google.com [74.125.83.71]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 083DB6B05D8 for ; Fri, 18 May 2018 12:23:17 -0400 (EDT) Received: by mail-pg0-f71.google.com with SMTP id r9-v6so3071676pgp.12 for ; Fri, 18 May 2018 09:23:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org. [2607:7c80:54:e::133]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id s3-v6si7775696plq.87.2018.05.18.09.23.15 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Fri, 18 May 2018 09:23:15 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 18 May 2018 09:23:14 -0700 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/10] Misc block layer patches for bcachefs Message-ID: <20180518162314.GC25227@infradead.org> References: <20180509013358.16399-1-kent.overstreet@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: Jens Axboe Cc: Kent Overstreet , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, Ingo Molnar On Fri, May 11, 2018 at 03:13:38PM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote: > Looked over the series, and looks like both good cleanups and optimizations. > If we can get the mempool patch sorted, I can apply this for 4.18. FYI, I agree on the actual cleanups and optimization, but we really shouldn't add new functions or even just exports without the code using them. I think it is enough if we can collect ACKs on them, but there is no point in using them. Especially as I'd really like to see the users for some of them first.