linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
To: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp>
Cc: guro@fb.com, rientjes@google.com, hannes@cmpxchg.org,
	vdavydov.dev@gmail.com, tj@kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	akpm@linux-foundation.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm,oom: Don't call schedule_timeout_killable() with oom_lock held.
Date: Tue, 29 May 2018 19:28:15 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180529172815.GY27180@dhcp22.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180529171833.GX27180@dhcp22.suse.cz>

On Tue 29-05-18 19:18:33, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Tue 29-05-18 23:33:13, Tetsuo Handa wrote:
> > On 2018/05/29 17:16, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > > With the full changelog. This can be either folded into the respective
> > > patch or applied on top.
> > > 
> > >>From 0bd619e7a68337c97bdaed288e813e96a14ba339 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> > > From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
> > > Date: Tue, 29 May 2018 10:09:33 +0200
> > > Subject: [PATCH] mm, memcg, oom: fix pre-mature allocation failures
> > > 
> > > Tetsuo has noticed that "mm, oom: cgroup-aware OOM killer" can lead to a
> > > pre-mature allocation failure if the cgroup aware oom killer is enabled
> > > and select_victim_memcg doesn't pick up any memcg to kill because there
> > > is a memcg already being killed. oc->chosen_memcg will become INFLIGHT_VICTIM
> > > and oom_kill_memcg_victim will bail out early. oc->chosen_task will
> > > stay NULL, however, and out_of_memory will therefore return false which
> > > forces __alloc_pages_may_oom to not set did_some_progress and the page
> > > allocator backs out and fails the allocation.
> > > U
> > > Fix this by checking both chosen_task and chosen_memcg in out_of_memory
> > > and return false only when _both_ are NULL.
> > 
> > I don't like this patch. It is not easy to understand and is fragile to
> > future changes. Currently the only case !!oc->chosen can become false is that
> > there was no eligible tasks when SysRq-f was requested or memcg OOM occurred.
> 
> Well, the current contract is not easy unfortunatelly. We have two
> different modes of operation. We are either killing whole cgroups or a
> task from a cgroup. In any case, the contract says that if we have any
> killable entity then at least one of chosen* is set to INFLIGHT_VICTIM.
> Other than that one of them has to be !NULL or we have no eligible
> killable entity. The return value reflects all these cases.

Btw. if your concern is the readability then we can add a helper and
decsribe all the above in the comment.
-- 
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs

  reply	other threads:[~2018-05-29 17:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 51+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-05-12 14:18 [PATCH] mm,oom: Don't call schedule_timeout_killable() with oom_lock held Tetsuo Handa
2018-05-15  9:16 ` Michal Hocko
2018-05-18 10:14   ` Tetsuo Handa
2018-05-18 12:20     ` Michal Hocko
2018-05-20 15:56       ` Tetsuo Handa
2018-05-22  6:18         ` Michal Hocko
2018-05-23 10:24           ` Tetsuo Handa
2018-05-23 11:57             ` Michal Hocko
2018-05-23 13:45               ` Tetsuo Handa
2018-05-23 14:56                 ` Michal Hocko
2018-05-24 10:51                   ` Tetsuo Handa
2018-05-24 11:50                     ` Michal Hocko
2018-05-25  1:17                       ` Tetsuo Handa
2018-05-25  8:31                         ` Michal Hocko
2018-05-25 10:57                           ` Tetsuo Handa
2018-05-25 11:42                             ` Michal Hocko
2018-05-25 11:46                               ` Tetsuo Handa
2018-05-28 12:43                                 ` Michal Hocko
2018-05-28 20:57                                   ` Tetsuo Handa
2018-05-29  7:17                                     ` Michal Hocko
2018-05-29 23:07                                       ` Andrew Morton
2018-05-31 10:10                                         ` Tetsuo Handa
2018-05-31 10:44                                           ` Michal Hocko
2018-05-31 15:23                                             ` Tetsuo Handa
2018-05-31 18:47                                               ` Michal Hocko
2018-06-01  1:21                                                 ` Tetsuo Handa
2018-06-01  8:04                                                   ` Michal Hocko
2018-06-01 15:28                                         ` Michal Hocko
2018-06-01 21:11                                           ` Andrew Morton
2018-06-04  7:04                                             ` Michal Hocko
2018-06-04 10:41                                               ` Tetsuo Handa
2018-06-04 11:22                                                 ` Michal Hocko
2018-06-04 11:30                                                   ` Tetsuo Handa
2018-06-06  9:02                                                 ` David Rientjes
2018-06-06 13:37                                                   ` Tetsuo Handa
2018-06-06 18:44                                                     ` David Rientjes
2018-05-29  7:17             ` Michal Hocko
2018-05-29  8:16               ` Michal Hocko
2018-05-29 14:33                 ` Tetsuo Handa
2018-05-29 17:18                   ` Michal Hocko
2018-05-29 17:28                     ` Michal Hocko [this message]
2018-05-31 16:31                 ` [PATCH] mm, memcg, oom: fix pre-mature allocation failures kbuild test robot
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2018-03-22 10:51 [PATCH] mm,oom: Don't call schedule_timeout_killable() with oom_lock held Tetsuo Handa
2018-03-22 11:45 ` Michal Hocko
2018-03-22 13:16   ` Tetsuo Handa
2018-01-22 13:46 Tetsuo Handa
2018-01-23  8:38 ` Michal Hocko
2018-01-23 12:07   ` Tetsuo Handa
2018-01-23 12:42     ` Michal Hocko
2018-01-24 13:28       ` Tetsuo Handa
2018-02-13 11:58         ` Tetsuo Handa

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180529172815.GY27180@dhcp22.suse.cz \
    --to=mhocko@kernel.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=guro@fb.com \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp \
    --cc=rientjes@google.com \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=vdavydov.dev@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).