[PATCH 4.14 152/189] x86/pkeys/selftests: Adjust the self-test to fresh distros that export the pkeys ABI

[PATCH 4.14 152/189] x86/pkeys/selftests: Adjust the self-test to fresh distros that export the pkeys ABI

[Greg Kroah-Hartman]

4.14-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>

[ Upstream commit 0fb96620dce351608aa82eed5942e2f58b07beda ]

Ubuntu 18.04 started exporting pkeys details in header files, resulting
in build failures and warnings in the pkeys self-tests:

  protection_keys.c:232:0: warning: "SEGV_BNDERR" redefined
  protection_keys.c:387:5: error: conflicting types for a??pkey_geta??
  protection_keys.c:409:5: error: conflicting types for a??pkey_seta??
  ...

Fix these namespace conflicts and double definitions, plus also
clean up the ABI definitions to make it all a bit more readable ...

Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org
Cc: dave.hansen@intel.com
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org
Cc: linuxram@us.ibm.com
Cc: mpe@ellerman.id.au
Cc: shakeelb@google.com
Cc: shuah@kernel.org
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180514085623.GB7094@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@microsoft.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
 tools/testing/selftests/x86/protection_keys.c |   67 +++++++++++++++-----------
 1 file changed, 41 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)

--- a/tools/testing/selftests/x86/protection_keys.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/x86/protection_keys.c
@@ -191,26 +191,30 @@ void lots_o_noops_around_write(int *writ
 #ifdef __i386__
 
 #ifndef SYS_mprotect_key
-# define SYS_mprotect_key 380
+# define SYS_mprotect_key	380
 #endif
+
 #ifndef SYS_pkey_alloc
-# define SYS_pkey_alloc	 381
-# define SYS_pkey_free	 382
+# define SYS_pkey_alloc		381
+# define SYS_pkey_free		382
 #endif
-#define REG_IP_IDX REG_EIP
-#define si_pkey_offset 0x14
+
+#define REG_IP_IDX		REG_EIP
+#define si_pkey_offset		0x14
 
 #else
 
 #ifndef SYS_mprotect_key
-# define SYS_mprotect_key 329
+# define SYS_mprotect_key	329
 #endif
+
 #ifndef SYS_pkey_alloc
-# define SYS_pkey_alloc	 330
-# define SYS_pkey_free	 331
+# define SYS_pkey_alloc		330
+# define SYS_pkey_free		331
 #endif
-#define REG_IP_IDX REG_RIP
-#define si_pkey_offset 0x20
+
+#define REG_IP_IDX		REG_RIP
+#define si_pkey_offset		0x20
 
 #endif
 
@@ -225,8 +229,14 @@ void dump_mem(void *dumpme, int len_byte
 	}
 }
 
-#define SEGV_BNDERR     3  /* failed address bound checks */
-#define SEGV_PKUERR     4
+/* Failed address bound checks: */
+#ifndef SEGV_BNDERR
+# define SEGV_BNDERR		3
+#endif
+
+#ifndef SEGV_PKUERR
+# define SEGV_PKUERR		4
+#endif
 
 static char *si_code_str(int si_code)
 {
@@ -393,10 +403,15 @@ pid_t fork_lazy_child(void)
 	return forkret;
 }
 
-#define PKEY_DISABLE_ACCESS    0x1
-#define PKEY_DISABLE_WRITE     0x2
+#ifndef PKEY_DISABLE_ACCESS
+# define PKEY_DISABLE_ACCESS	0x1
+#endif
+
+#ifndef PKEY_DISABLE_WRITE
+# define PKEY_DISABLE_WRITE	0x2
+#endif
 
-u32 pkey_get(int pkey, unsigned long flags)
+static u32 hw_pkey_get(int pkey, unsigned long flags)
 {
 	u32 mask = (PKEY_DISABLE_ACCESS|PKEY_DISABLE_WRITE);
 	u32 pkru = __rdpkru();
@@ -418,7 +433,7 @@ u32 pkey_get(int pkey, unsigned long fla
 	return masked_pkru;
 }
 
-int pkey_set(int pkey, unsigned long rights, unsigned long flags)
+static int hw_pkey_set(int pkey, unsigned long rights, unsigned long flags)
 {
 	u32 mask = (PKEY_DISABLE_ACCESS|PKEY_DISABLE_WRITE);
 	u32 old_pkru = __rdpkru();
@@ -452,15 +467,15 @@ void pkey_disable_set(int pkey, int flag
 		pkey, flags);
 	pkey_assert(flags & (PKEY_DISABLE_ACCESS | PKEY_DISABLE_WRITE));
 
-	pkey_rights = pkey_get(pkey, syscall_flags);
+	pkey_rights = hw_pkey_get(pkey, syscall_flags);
 
-	dprintf1("%s(%d) pkey_get(%d): %x\n", __func__,
+	dprintf1("%s(%d) hw_pkey_get(%d): %x\n", __func__,
 			pkey, pkey, pkey_rights);
 	pkey_assert(pkey_rights >= 0);
 
 	pkey_rights |= flags;
 
-	ret = pkey_set(pkey, pkey_rights, syscall_flags);
+	ret = hw_pkey_set(pkey, pkey_rights, syscall_flags);
 	assert(!ret);
 	/*pkru and flags have the same format */
 	shadow_pkru |= flags << (pkey * 2);
@@ -468,8 +483,8 @@ void pkey_disable_set(int pkey, int flag
 
 	pkey_assert(ret >= 0);
 
-	pkey_rights = pkey_get(pkey, syscall_flags);
-	dprintf1("%s(%d) pkey_get(%d): %x\n", __func__,
+	pkey_rights = hw_pkey_get(pkey, syscall_flags);
+	dprintf1("%s(%d) hw_pkey_get(%d): %x\n", __func__,
 			pkey, pkey, pkey_rights);
 
 	dprintf1("%s(%d) pkru: 0x%x\n", __func__, pkey, rdpkru());
@@ -483,24 +498,24 @@ void pkey_disable_clear(int pkey, int fl
 {
 	unsigned long syscall_flags = 0;
 	int ret;
-	int pkey_rights = pkey_get(pkey, syscall_flags);
+	int pkey_rights = hw_pkey_get(pkey, syscall_flags);
 	u32 orig_pkru = rdpkru();
 
 	pkey_assert(flags & (PKEY_DISABLE_ACCESS | PKEY_DISABLE_WRITE));
 
-	dprintf1("%s(%d) pkey_get(%d): %x\n", __func__,
+	dprintf1("%s(%d) hw_pkey_get(%d): %x\n", __func__,
 			pkey, pkey, pkey_rights);
 	pkey_assert(pkey_rights >= 0);
 
 	pkey_rights |= flags;
 
-	ret = pkey_set(pkey, pkey_rights, 0);
+	ret = hw_pkey_set(pkey, pkey_rights, 0);
 	/* pkru and flags have the same format */
 	shadow_pkru &= ~(flags << (pkey * 2));
 	pkey_assert(ret >= 0);
 
-	pkey_rights = pkey_get(pkey, syscall_flags);
-	dprintf1("%s(%d) pkey_get(%d): %x\n", __func__,
+	pkey_rights = hw_pkey_get(pkey, syscall_flags);
+	dprintf1("%s(%d) hw_pkey_get(%d): %x\n", __func__,
 			pkey, pkey, pkey_rights);
 
 	dprintf1("%s(%d) pkru: 0x%x\n", __func__, pkey, rdpkru());

[PATCH 4.14 153/189] x86/mpx/selftests: Adjust the self-test to fresh distros that export the MPX ABI

[Greg Kroah-Hartman]

4.14-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>

[ Upstream commit 73bb4d6cd192b8629c5125aaada9892d9fc986b6 ]

Fix this warning:

  mpx-mini-test.c:422:0: warning: "SEGV_BNDERR" redefined

Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org
Cc: dave.hansen@intel.com
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org
Cc: linuxram@us.ibm.com
Cc: mpe@ellerman.id.au
Cc: shakeelb@google.com
Cc: shuah@kernel.org
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180514085908.GA12798@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@microsoft.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
 tools/testing/selftests/x86/mpx-mini-test.c |    7 +++++--
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

--- a/tools/testing/selftests/x86/mpx-mini-test.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/x86/mpx-mini-test.c
@@ -368,6 +368,11 @@ static int expected_bnd_index = -1;
 uint64_t shadow_plb[NR_MPX_BOUNDS_REGISTERS][2]; /* shadow MPX bound registers */
 unsigned long shadow_map[NR_MPX_BOUNDS_REGISTERS];
 
+/* Failed address bound checks: */
+#ifndef SEGV_BNDERR
+# define SEGV_BNDERR	3
+#endif
+
 /*
  * The kernel is supposed to provide some information about the bounds
  * exception in the siginfo.  It should match what we have in the bounds
@@ -419,8 +424,6 @@ void handler(int signum, siginfo_t *si,
 		br_count++;
 		dprintf1("#BR 0x%jx (total seen: %d)\n", status, br_count);
 
-#define SEGV_BNDERR     3  /* failed address bound checks */
-
 		dprintf2("Saw a #BR! status 0x%jx at %016lx br_reason: %jx\n",
 				status, ip, br_reason);
 		dprintf2("si_signo: %d\n", si->si_signo);

[PATCH 4.14 155/189] x86/pkeys/selftests: Give better unexpected fault error messages

[Greg Kroah-Hartman]

4.14-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>

[ Upstream commit 55556b0b2016806b2e16a20b62d143383983a34a ]

do_not_expect_pk_fault() is a helper that we call when we do not expect
a PK fault to have occurred.  But, it is a function, which means that
it obscures the line numbers from pkey_assert().  It also gives no
details.

Replace it with an implementation that gives nice line numbers and
also lets callers pass in a more descriptive message about what
happened that caused the unexpected fault.

Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Michael Ellermen <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Ram Pai <linuxram@us.ibm.com>
Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180509171338.55D13B64@viggo.jf.intel.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@microsoft.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
 tools/testing/selftests/x86/protection_keys.c |   13 +++++++------
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

--- a/tools/testing/selftests/x86/protection_keys.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/x86/protection_keys.c
@@ -954,10 +954,11 @@ void expected_pk_fault(int pkey)
 	last_si_pkey = -1;
 }
 
-void do_not_expect_pk_fault(void)
-{
-	pkey_assert(last_pkru_faults == pkru_faults);
-}
+#define do_not_expect_pk_fault(msg)	do {			\
+	if (last_pkru_faults != pkru_faults)			\
+		dprintf0("unexpected PK fault: %s\n", msg);	\
+	pkey_assert(last_pkru_faults == pkru_faults);		\
+} while (0)
 
 int test_fds[10] = { -1 };
 int nr_test_fds;
@@ -1243,7 +1244,7 @@ void test_ptrace_of_child(int *ptr, u16
 	pkey_assert(ret != -1);
 	/* Now access from the current task, and expect NO exception: */
 	peek_result = read_ptr(plain_ptr);
-	do_not_expect_pk_fault();
+	do_not_expect_pk_fault("read plain pointer after ptrace");
 
 	ret = ptrace(PTRACE_DETACH, child_pid, ignored, 0);
 	pkey_assert(ret != -1);
@@ -1287,7 +1288,7 @@ void test_executing_on_unreadable_memory
 	 */
 	madvise(p1, PAGE_SIZE, MADV_DONTNEED);
 	lots_o_noops_around_write(&scratch);
-	do_not_expect_pk_fault();
+	do_not_expect_pk_fault("executing on PROT_EXEC memory");
 	ptr_contents = read_ptr(p1);
 	dprintf2("ptr (%p) contents@%d: %x\n", p1, __LINE__, ptr_contents);
 	expected_pk_fault(pkey);

[PATCH 4.14 156/189] x86/pkeys/selftests: Stop using assert()

[Greg Kroah-Hartman]

4.14-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>

[ Upstream commit 86b9eea230edf4c67d4d4a70fba9b74505867a25 ]

If we use assert(), the program "crashes".  That can be scary to users,
so stop doing it.  Just exit with a >0 exit code instead.

Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Michael Ellermen <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Ram Pai <linuxram@us.ibm.com>
Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180509171340.E63EF7DA@viggo.jf.intel.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@microsoft.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
 tools/testing/selftests/x86/protection_keys.c |   12 ++++++++----
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

--- a/tools/testing/selftests/x86/protection_keys.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/x86/protection_keys.c
@@ -72,10 +72,9 @@ extern void abort_hooks(void);
 				test_nr, iteration_nr);	\
 		dprintf0("errno at assert: %d", errno);	\
 		abort_hooks();			\
-		assert(condition);		\
+		exit(__LINE__);			\
 	}					\
 } while (0)
-#define raw_assert(cond) assert(cond)
 
 void cat_into_file(char *str, char *file)
 {
@@ -87,12 +86,17 @@ void cat_into_file(char *str, char *file
 	 * these need to be raw because they are called under
 	 * pkey_assert()
 	 */
-	raw_assert(fd >= 0);
+	if (fd < 0) {
+		fprintf(stderr, "error opening '%s'\n", str);
+		perror("error: ");
+		exit(__LINE__);
+	}
+
 	ret = write(fd, str, strlen(str));
 	if (ret != strlen(str)) {
 		perror("write to file failed");
 		fprintf(stderr, "filename: '%s' str: '%s'\n", file, str);
-		raw_assert(0);
+		exit(__LINE__);
 	}
 	close(fd);
 }

[PATCH 4.14 157/189] x86/pkeys/selftests: Remove dead debugging code, fix dprint_in_signal

[Greg Kroah-Hartman]

4.14-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>

[ Upstream commit a50093d60464dd51d1ae0c2267b0abe9e1de77f3 ]

There is some noisy debug code at the end of the signal handler.  It was
disabled by an early, unconditional "return".  However, that return also
hid a dprint_in_signal=0, which kept dprint_in_signal=1 and effectively
locked us into permanent dprint_in_signal=1 behavior.

Remove the return and the dead code, fixing dprint_in_signal.

Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Michael Ellermen <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Ram Pai <linuxram@us.ibm.com>
Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180509171342.846B9B2E@viggo.jf.intel.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@microsoft.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
 tools/testing/selftests/x86/protection_keys.c |   16 ----------------
 1 file changed, 16 deletions(-)

--- a/tools/testing/selftests/x86/protection_keys.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/x86/protection_keys.c
@@ -325,22 +325,6 @@ void signal_handler(int signum, siginfo_
 	dprintf1("WARNING: set PRKU=0 to allow faulting instruction to continue\n");
 	pkru_faults++;
 	dprintf1("<<<<==================================================\n");
-	return;
-	if (trapno == 14) {
-		fprintf(stderr,
-			"ERROR: In signal handler, page fault, trapno = %d, ip = %016lx\n",
-			trapno, ip);
-		fprintf(stderr, "si_addr %p\n", si->si_addr);
-		fprintf(stderr, "REG_ERR: %lx\n",
-				(unsigned long)uctxt->uc_mcontext.gregs[REG_ERR]);
-		exit(1);
-	} else {
-		fprintf(stderr, "unexpected trap %d! at 0x%lx\n", trapno, ip);
-		fprintf(stderr, "si_addr %p\n", si->si_addr);
-		fprintf(stderr, "REG_ERR: %lx\n",
-				(unsigned long)uctxt->uc_mcontext.gregs[REG_ERR]);
-		exit(2);
-	}
 	dprint_in_signal = 0;
 }
 

[PATCH 4.14 158/189] x86/pkeys/selftests: Allow faults on unknown keys

[Greg Kroah-Hartman]

4.14-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>

[ Upstream commit 7e7fd67ca39335a49619729821efb7cbdd674eb0 ]

The exec-only pkey is allocated inside the kernel and userspace
is not told what it is.  So, allow PK faults to occur that have
an unknown key.

Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Michael Ellermen <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Ram Pai <linuxram@us.ibm.com>
Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180509171345.7FC7DA00@viggo.jf.intel.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@microsoft.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
 tools/testing/selftests/x86/protection_keys.c |   10 +++++++++-
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

--- a/tools/testing/selftests/x86/protection_keys.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/x86/protection_keys.c
@@ -921,13 +921,21 @@ void *malloc_pkey(long size, int prot, u
 }
 
 int last_pkru_faults;
+#define UNKNOWN_PKEY -2
 void expected_pk_fault(int pkey)
 {
 	dprintf2("%s(): last_pkru_faults: %d pkru_faults: %d\n",
 			__func__, last_pkru_faults, pkru_faults);
 	dprintf2("%s(%d): last_si_pkey: %d\n", __func__, pkey, last_si_pkey);
 	pkey_assert(last_pkru_faults + 1 == pkru_faults);
-	pkey_assert(last_si_pkey == pkey);
+
+       /*
+	* For exec-only memory, we do not know the pkey in
+	* advance, so skip this check.
+	*/
+	if (pkey != UNKNOWN_PKEY)
+		pkey_assert(last_si_pkey == pkey);
+
 	/*
 	 * The signal handler shold have cleared out PKRU to let the
 	 * test program continue.  We now have to restore it.

[PATCH 4.14 159/189] x86/pkeys/selftests: Factor out "instruction page"

[Greg Kroah-Hartman]

4.14-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>

[ Upstream commit 3fcd2b2d928904cbf30b01e2c5e4f1dd2f9ab262 ]

We currently have an execute-only test, but it is for
the explicit mprotect_pkey() interface.  We will soon
add a test for the implicit mprotect(PROT_EXEC)
enterface.  We need this code in both tests.

Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Michael Ellermen <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Ram Pai <linuxram@us.ibm.com>
Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180509171347.C64AB733@viggo.jf.intel.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@microsoft.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
 tools/testing/selftests/x86/protection_keys.c |   21 +++++++++++++++++----
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

--- a/tools/testing/selftests/x86/protection_keys.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/x86/protection_keys.c
@@ -1253,12 +1253,9 @@ void test_ptrace_of_child(int *ptr, u16
 	free(plain_ptr_unaligned);
 }
 
-void test_executing_on_unreadable_memory(int *ptr, u16 pkey)
+void *get_pointer_to_instructions(void)
 {
 	void *p1;
-	int scratch;
-	int ptr_contents;
-	int ret;
 
 	p1 = ALIGN_PTR_UP(&lots_o_noops_around_write, PAGE_SIZE);
 	dprintf3("&lots_o_noops: %p\n", &lots_o_noops_around_write);
@@ -1268,7 +1265,23 @@ void test_executing_on_unreadable_memory
 	/* Point 'p1' at the *second* page of the function: */
 	p1 += PAGE_SIZE;
 
+	/*
+	 * Try to ensure we fault this in on next touch to ensure
+	 * we get an instruction fault as opposed to a data one
+	 */
 	madvise(p1, PAGE_SIZE, MADV_DONTNEED);
+
+	return p1;
+}
+
+void test_executing_on_unreadable_memory(int *ptr, u16 pkey)
+{
+	void *p1;
+	int scratch;
+	int ptr_contents;
+	int ret;
+
+	p1 = get_pointer_to_instructions();
 	lots_o_noops_around_write(&scratch);
 	ptr_contents = read_ptr(p1);
 	dprintf2("ptr (%p) contents@%d: %x\n", p1, __LINE__, ptr_contents);

[PATCH 4.14 160/189] x86/pkeys/selftests: Add PROT_EXEC test

[Greg Kroah-Hartman]

4.14-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>

[ Upstream commit 6af17cf89e99b64cf1f660bf848755442ab2f047 ]

Under the covers, implement executable-only memory with
protection keys when userspace calls mprotect(PROT_EXEC).

But, we did not have a selftest for that.  Now we do.

Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Michael Ellermen <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Ram Pai <linuxram@us.ibm.com>
Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180509171348.9EEE4BEF@viggo.jf.intel.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@microsoft.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
 tools/testing/selftests/x86/protection_keys.c |   44 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 44 insertions(+)

--- a/tools/testing/selftests/x86/protection_keys.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/x86/protection_keys.c
@@ -1303,6 +1303,49 @@ void test_executing_on_unreadable_memory
 	expected_pk_fault(pkey);
 }
 
+void test_implicit_mprotect_exec_only_memory(int *ptr, u16 pkey)
+{
+	void *p1;
+	int scratch;
+	int ptr_contents;
+	int ret;
+
+	dprintf1("%s() start\n", __func__);
+
+	p1 = get_pointer_to_instructions();
+	lots_o_noops_around_write(&scratch);
+	ptr_contents = read_ptr(p1);
+	dprintf2("ptr (%p) contents@%d: %x\n", p1, __LINE__, ptr_contents);
+
+	/* Use a *normal* mprotect(), not mprotect_pkey(): */
+	ret = mprotect(p1, PAGE_SIZE, PROT_EXEC);
+	pkey_assert(!ret);
+
+	dprintf2("pkru: %x\n", rdpkru());
+
+	/* Make sure this is an *instruction* fault */
+	madvise(p1, PAGE_SIZE, MADV_DONTNEED);
+	lots_o_noops_around_write(&scratch);
+	do_not_expect_pk_fault("executing on PROT_EXEC memory");
+	ptr_contents = read_ptr(p1);
+	dprintf2("ptr (%p) contents@%d: %x\n", p1, __LINE__, ptr_contents);
+	expected_pk_fault(UNKNOWN_PKEY);
+
+	/*
+	 * Put the memory back to non-PROT_EXEC.  Should clear the
+	 * exec-only pkey off the VMA and allow it to be readable
+	 * again.  Go to PROT_NONE first to check for a kernel bug
+	 * that did not clear the pkey when doing PROT_NONE.
+	 */
+	ret = mprotect(p1, PAGE_SIZE, PROT_NONE);
+	pkey_assert(!ret);
+
+	ret = mprotect(p1, PAGE_SIZE, PROT_READ|PROT_EXEC);
+	pkey_assert(!ret);
+	ptr_contents = read_ptr(p1);
+	do_not_expect_pk_fault("plain read on recently PROT_EXEC area");
+}
+
 void test_mprotect_pkey_on_unsupported_cpu(int *ptr, u16 pkey)
 {
 	int size = PAGE_SIZE;
@@ -1327,6 +1370,7 @@ void (*pkey_tests[])(int *ptr, u16 pkey)
 	test_kernel_gup_of_access_disabled_region,
 	test_kernel_gup_write_to_write_disabled_region,
 	test_executing_on_unreadable_memory,
+	test_implicit_mprotect_exec_only_memory,
 	test_ptrace_of_child,
 	test_pkey_syscalls_on_non_allocated_pkey,
 	test_pkey_syscalls_bad_args,

[PATCH 4.14 161/189] x86/pkeys/selftests: Fix pkey exhaustion test off-by-one

[Greg Kroah-Hartman]

4.14-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>

[ Upstream commit f50b4878329ab61d8e05796f655adeb6f5fb57c6 ]

In our "exhaust all pkeys" test, we make sure that there
is the expected number available.  Turns out that the
test did not cover the execute-only key, but discussed
it anyway.  It did *not* discuss the test-allocated
key.

Now that we have a test for the mprotect(PROT_EXEC) case,
this off-by-one issue showed itself.  Correct the off-by-
one and add the explanation for the case we missed.

Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Michael Ellermen <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Ram Pai <linuxram@us.ibm.com>
Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180509171350.E1656B95@viggo.jf.intel.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@microsoft.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
 tools/testing/selftests/x86/protection_keys.c |   13 ++++++++-----
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

--- a/tools/testing/selftests/x86/protection_keys.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/x86/protection_keys.c
@@ -1163,12 +1163,15 @@ void test_pkey_alloc_exhaust(int *ptr, u
 	pkey_assert(i < NR_PKEYS*2);
 
 	/*
-	 * There are 16 pkeys supported in hardware.  One is taken
-	 * up for the default (0) and another can be taken up by
-	 * an execute-only mapping.  Ensure that we can allocate
-	 * at least 14 (16-2).
+	 * There are 16 pkeys supported in hardware.  Three are
+	 * allocated by the time we get here:
+	 *   1. The default key (0)
+	 *   2. One possibly consumed by an execute-only mapping.
+	 *   3. One allocated by the test code and passed in via
+	 *      'pkey' to this function.
+	 * Ensure that we can allocate at least another 13 (16-3).
 	 */
-	pkey_assert(i >= NR_PKEYS-2);
+	pkey_assert(i >= NR_PKEYS-3);
 
 	for (i = 0; i < nr_allocated_pkeys; i++) {
 		err = sys_pkey_free(allocated_pkeys[i]);

[PATCH 4.14 162/189] x86/pkeys/selftests: Fix pointer math

[Greg Kroah-Hartman]

4.14-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>

[ Upstream commit 3d64f4ed15c3c53dba4c514bf59c334464dee373 ]

We dump out the entire area of the siginfo where the si_pkey_ptr is
supposed to be.  But, we do some math on the poitner, which is a u32.
We intended to do byte math, not u32 math on the pointer.

Cast it over to a u8* so it works.

Also, move this block of code to below th si_code check.  It doesn't
hurt anything, but the si_pkey field is gibberish for other signal
types.

Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Michael Ellermen <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Ram Pai <linuxram@us.ibm.com>
Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180509171352.9BE09819@viggo.jf.intel.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@microsoft.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
 tools/testing/selftests/x86/protection_keys.c |   14 +++++++-------
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

--- a/tools/testing/selftests/x86/protection_keys.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/x86/protection_keys.c
@@ -303,13 +303,6 @@ void signal_handler(int signum, siginfo_
 		dump_mem(pkru_ptr - 128, 256);
 	pkey_assert(*pkru_ptr);
 
-	si_pkey_ptr = (u32 *)(((u8 *)si) + si_pkey_offset);
-	dprintf1("si_pkey_ptr: %p\n", si_pkey_ptr);
-	dump_mem(si_pkey_ptr - 8, 24);
-	siginfo_pkey = *si_pkey_ptr;
-	pkey_assert(siginfo_pkey < NR_PKEYS);
-	last_si_pkey = siginfo_pkey;
-
 	if ((si->si_code == SEGV_MAPERR) ||
 	    (si->si_code == SEGV_ACCERR) ||
 	    (si->si_code == SEGV_BNDERR)) {
@@ -317,6 +310,13 @@ void signal_handler(int signum, siginfo_
 		exit(4);
 	}
 
+	si_pkey_ptr = (u32 *)(((u8 *)si) + si_pkey_offset);
+	dprintf1("si_pkey_ptr: %p\n", si_pkey_ptr);
+	dump_mem((u8 *)si_pkey_ptr - 8, 24);
+	siginfo_pkey = *si_pkey_ptr;
+	pkey_assert(siginfo_pkey < NR_PKEYS);
+	last_si_pkey = siginfo_pkey;
+
 	dprintf1("signal pkru from xsave: %08x\n", *pkru_ptr);
 	/* need __rdpkru() version so we do not do shadow_pkru checking */
 	dprintf1("signal pkru from  pkru: %08x\n", __rdpkru());

[PATCH 4.14 163/189] x86/pkeys/selftests: Save off prot for allocations

[Greg Kroah-Hartman]

4.14-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>

[ Upstream commit acb25d761d6f2f64e785ccefc71e54f244f1eda4 ]

This makes it possible to to tell what 'prot' a given allocation
is supposed to have.  That way, if we want to change just the
pkey, we know what 'prot' to pass to mprotect_pkey().

Also, keep a record of the most recent allocation so the tests
can easily find it.

Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Michael Ellermen <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Ram Pai <linuxram@us.ibm.com>
Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180509171354.AA23E228@viggo.jf.intel.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@microsoft.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
 tools/testing/selftests/x86/protection_keys.c |   14 +++++++++-----
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

--- a/tools/testing/selftests/x86/protection_keys.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/x86/protection_keys.c
@@ -677,10 +677,12 @@ int mprotect_pkey(void *ptr, size_t size
 struct pkey_malloc_record {
 	void *ptr;
 	long size;
+	int prot;
 };
 struct pkey_malloc_record *pkey_malloc_records;
+struct pkey_malloc_record *pkey_last_malloc_record;
 long nr_pkey_malloc_records;
-void record_pkey_malloc(void *ptr, long size)
+void record_pkey_malloc(void *ptr, long size, int prot)
 {
 	long i;
 	struct pkey_malloc_record *rec = NULL;
@@ -712,6 +714,8 @@ void record_pkey_malloc(void *ptr, long
 		(int)(rec - pkey_malloc_records), rec, ptr, size);
 	rec->ptr = ptr;
 	rec->size = size;
+	rec->prot = prot;
+	pkey_last_malloc_record = rec;
 	nr_pkey_malloc_records++;
 }
 
@@ -756,7 +760,7 @@ void *malloc_pkey_with_mprotect(long siz
 	pkey_assert(ptr != (void *)-1);
 	ret = mprotect_pkey((void *)ptr, PAGE_SIZE, prot, pkey);
 	pkey_assert(!ret);
-	record_pkey_malloc(ptr, size);
+	record_pkey_malloc(ptr, size, prot);
 	rdpkru();
 
 	dprintf1("%s() for pkey %d @ %p\n", __func__, pkey, ptr);
@@ -777,7 +781,7 @@ void *malloc_pkey_anon_huge(long size, i
 	size = ALIGN_UP(size, HPAGE_SIZE * 2);
 	ptr = mmap(NULL, size, PROT_NONE, MAP_ANONYMOUS|MAP_PRIVATE, -1, 0);
 	pkey_assert(ptr != (void *)-1);
-	record_pkey_malloc(ptr, size);
+	record_pkey_malloc(ptr, size, prot);
 	mprotect_pkey(ptr, size, prot, pkey);
 
 	dprintf1("unaligned ptr: %p\n", ptr);
@@ -850,7 +854,7 @@ void *malloc_pkey_hugetlb(long size, int
 	pkey_assert(ptr != (void *)-1);
 	mprotect_pkey(ptr, size, prot, pkey);
 
-	record_pkey_malloc(ptr, size);
+	record_pkey_malloc(ptr, size, prot);
 
 	dprintf1("mmap()'d hugetlbfs for pkey %d @ %p\n", pkey, ptr);
 	return ptr;
@@ -872,7 +876,7 @@ void *malloc_pkey_mmap_dax(long size, in
 
 	mprotect_pkey(ptr, size, prot, pkey);
 
-	record_pkey_malloc(ptr, size);
+	record_pkey_malloc(ptr, size, prot);
 
 	dprintf1("mmap()'d for pkey %d @ %p\n", pkey, ptr);
 	close(fd);

[PATCH 4.14 164/189] x86/pkeys/selftests: Add a test for pkey 0

[Greg Kroah-Hartman]

4.14-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>

[ Upstream commit 3488a600d90bcaf061b104dbcfbdc8d99b398312 ]

Protection key 0 is the default key for all memory and will
not normally come back from pkey_alloc().  But, you might
still want pass it to mprotect_pkey().

This check ensures that you can use pkey 0.

Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Michael Ellermen <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Ram Pai <linuxram@us.ibm.com>
Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180509171356.9E40B254@viggo.jf.intel.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@microsoft.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
 tools/testing/selftests/x86/protection_keys.c |   30 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 30 insertions(+)

--- a/tools/testing/selftests/x86/protection_keys.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/x86/protection_keys.c
@@ -1184,6 +1184,35 @@ void test_pkey_alloc_exhaust(int *ptr, u
 	}
 }
 
+/*
+ * pkey 0 is special.  It is allocated by default, so you do not
+ * have to call pkey_alloc() to use it first.  Make sure that it
+ * is usable.
+ */
+void test_mprotect_with_pkey_0(int *ptr, u16 pkey)
+{
+	long size;
+	int prot;
+
+	assert(pkey_last_malloc_record);
+	size = pkey_last_malloc_record->size;
+	/*
+	 * This is a bit of a hack.  But mprotect() requires
+	 * huge-page-aligned sizes when operating on hugetlbfs.
+	 * So, make sure that we use something that's a multiple
+	 * of a huge page when we can.
+	 */
+	if (size >= HPAGE_SIZE)
+		size = HPAGE_SIZE;
+	prot = pkey_last_malloc_record->prot;
+
+	/* Use pkey 0 */
+	mprotect_pkey(ptr, size, prot, 0);
+
+	/* Make sure that we can set it back to the original pkey. */
+	mprotect_pkey(ptr, size, prot, pkey);
+}
+
 void test_ptrace_of_child(int *ptr, u16 pkey)
 {
 	__attribute__((__unused__)) int peek_result;
@@ -1378,6 +1407,7 @@ void (*pkey_tests[])(int *ptr, u16 pkey)
 	test_kernel_gup_write_to_write_disabled_region,
 	test_executing_on_unreadable_memory,
 	test_implicit_mprotect_exec_only_memory,
+	test_mprotect_with_pkey_0,
 	test_ptrace_of_child,
 	test_pkey_syscalls_on_non_allocated_pkey,
 	test_pkey_syscalls_bad_args,