From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
To: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, dave.hansen@intel.com,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linuxram@us.ibm.com, shakeelb@google.com,
shuah@kernel.org, Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@microsoft.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.16 234/279] x86/pkeys/selftests: Adjust the self-test to fresh distros that export the pkeys ABI
Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2018 09:19:37 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180705071937.GA2636@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <877emakynf.fsf@concordia.ellerman.id.au>
* Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> wrote:
> Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> writes:
>
> > On Tue, Jul 03, 2018 at 01:36:43PM +0200, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
> >> On 06/18/2018 10:13 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> >> > 4.16-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
> >>
> >> So I was wondering, why backport such a considerable number of
> >> *selftests* to stable, given the stable policy? Surely selftests don't
> >> affect the kernel itself breaking for users?
> >
> > These came in as part of Sasha's "backport fixes" tool. It can't hurt
> > to add selftest fixes/updates to stable kernels, as for some people,
> > they only run the selftests for the specific kernel they are building.
> > While others run selftests for the latest kernel on older kernels, both
> > of which are valid ways of testing.
>
> I don't have a problem with these sort of patches being backported, but
> it seems like Documentation/process/stable-kernel-rules.txt could use an
> update?
>
> I honestly don't know what the rules are anymore.
Self-tests are standalone tooling which help the testing of the kernel, and it
makes sense to either update all of them, or none of them.
Here it makes sense to update all of them, because if a self-test on a stable
kernel shows a failure then a fix is probably missing from -stable, right?
Also note that self-test tooling *cannot possibly break the kernel*, because they
are not used in the kernel build process, so the normally conservative backporting
rules do not apply.
Thanks,
Ingo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-07-05 7:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20180618080608.851973560@linuxfoundation.org>
2018-06-18 8:13 ` [PATCH 4.16 234/279] x86/pkeys/selftests: Adjust the self-test to fresh distros that export the pkeys ABI Greg Kroah-Hartman
2018-07-03 11:36 ` Vlastimil Babka
2018-07-03 11:42 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2018-07-05 6:03 ` Michael Ellerman
2018-07-05 7:19 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2018-07-08 10:33 ` Michael Ellerman
2018-07-08 13:25 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2018-07-09 3:28 ` Michael Ellerman
2018-06-18 8:13 ` [PATCH 4.16 235/279] x86/mpx/selftests: Adjust the self-test to fresh distros that export the MPX ABI Greg Kroah-Hartman
2018-06-18 8:13 ` [PATCH 4.16 237/279] x86/pkeys/selftests: Give better unexpected fault error messages Greg Kroah-Hartman
2018-06-18 8:13 ` [PATCH 4.16 238/279] x86/pkeys/selftests: Stop using assert() Greg Kroah-Hartman
2018-06-18 8:13 ` [PATCH 4.16 239/279] x86/pkeys/selftests: Remove dead debugging code, fix dprint_in_signal Greg Kroah-Hartman
2018-06-18 8:13 ` [PATCH 4.16 240/279] x86/pkeys/selftests: Avoid printf-in-signal deadlocks Greg Kroah-Hartman
2018-06-18 8:13 ` [PATCH 4.16 241/279] x86/pkeys/selftests: Allow faults on unknown keys Greg Kroah-Hartman
2018-06-18 8:13 ` [PATCH 4.16 242/279] x86/pkeys/selftests: Factor out "instruction page" Greg Kroah-Hartman
2018-06-18 8:13 ` [PATCH 4.16 243/279] x86/pkeys/selftests: Add PROT_EXEC test Greg Kroah-Hartman
2018-06-18 8:13 ` [PATCH 4.16 244/279] x86/pkeys/selftests: Fix pkey exhaustion test off-by-one Greg Kroah-Hartman
2018-06-18 8:13 ` [PATCH 4.16 245/279] x86/pkeys/selftests: Fix pointer math Greg Kroah-Hartman
2018-06-18 8:13 ` [PATCH 4.16 246/279] x86/pkeys/selftests: Save off prot for allocations Greg Kroah-Hartman
2018-06-18 8:13 ` [PATCH 4.16 247/279] x86/pkeys/selftests: Add a test for pkey 0 Greg Kroah-Hartman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180705071937.GA2636@gmail.com \
--to=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=alexander.levin@microsoft.com \
--cc=dave.hansen@intel.com \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linuxram@us.ibm.com \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=shakeelb@google.com \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).