* Dan Williams wrote: > > config attached. Doh, I intended to attach the config - attached now. > > These numa_emulation changes are a bit of a trainwreck - I'm removing both > > num_emulation commits from -tip for now, could you please resubmit a fixed/tested > > combo version? > > So I squashed the fix and let the 0day robot chew on it all day with no reports > as of yet. I just recompiled it here and am not seeing the link failure, can you > send me the details of the kernel config + gcc version that is failing? My guess: it's some weird Kconfig combination in this 32-bit config. Can you reproduce it with this config? Thanks, Ingo