From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-ed1-f72.google.com (mail-ed1-f72.google.com [209.85.208.72]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F29336B026B for ; Tue, 10 Jul 2018 10:14:14 -0400 (EDT) Received: by mail-ed1-f72.google.com with SMTP id d30-v6so3370475edd.0 for ; Tue, 10 Jul 2018 07:14:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mx1.suse.de (mx2.suse.de. [195.135.220.15]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id s4-v6si3785958edh.359.2018.07.10.07.14.13 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 10 Jul 2018 07:14:13 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2018 16:14:10 +0200 From: Michal Hocko Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] mm, oom: distinguish blockable mode for mmu notifiers Message-ID: <20180710141410.GP14284@dhcp22.suse.cz> References: <20180622150242.16558-1-mhocko@kernel.org> <20180627074421.GF32348@dhcp22.suse.cz> <20180709122908.GJ22049@dhcp22.suse.cz> <20180710134040.GG3014@mtr-leonro.mtl.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20180710134040.GG3014@mtr-leonro.mtl.com> Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: Leon Romanovsky Cc: LKML , "David (ChunMing) Zhou" , Paolo Bonzini , Radim =?utf-8?B?S3LEjW3DocWZ?= , Alex Deucher , Christian =?iso-8859-1?Q?K=F6nig?= , David Airlie , Jani Nikula , Joonas Lahtinen , Rodrigo Vivi , Doug Ledford , Jason Gunthorpe , Mike Marciniszyn , Dennis Dalessandro , Sudeep Dutt , Ashutosh Dixit , Dimitri Sivanich , Boris Ostrovsky , Juergen Gross , =?iso-8859-1?B?Suly9G1l?= Glisse , Andrea Arcangeli , kvm@vger.kernel.org, amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org, xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, David Rientjes , Felix Kuehling On Tue 10-07-18 16:40:40, Leon Romanovsky wrote: > On Mon, Jul 09, 2018 at 02:29:08PM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote: > > On Wed 27-06-18 09:44:21, Michal Hocko wrote: > > > This is the v2 of RFC based on the feedback I've received so far. The > > > code even compiles as a bonus ;) I haven't runtime tested it yet, mostly > > > because I have no idea how. > > > > > > Any further feedback is highly appreciated of course. > > > > Any other feedback before I post this as non-RFC? > > From mlx5 perspective, who is primary user of umem_odp.c your change looks ok. Can I assume your Acked-by? Thanks for your review! -- Michal Hocko SUSE Labs