From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-pg1-f198.google.com (mail-pg1-f198.google.com [209.85.215.198]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EDA9F6B0003 for ; Tue, 17 Jul 2018 06:44:29 -0400 (EDT) Received: by mail-pg1-f198.google.com with SMTP id m25-v6so283636pgv.22 for ; Tue, 17 Jul 2018 03:44:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mx1.suse.de (mx2.suse.de. [195.135.220.15]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id u11-v6si767570plm.143.2018.07.17.03.44.28 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 17 Jul 2018 03:44:28 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2018 12:44:24 +0200 From: Michal Hocko Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] mm: Fix vma_is_anonymous() false-positives Message-ID: <20180717104424.GA7193@dhcp22.suse.cz> References: <20180710134821.84709-2-kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> <20180710134858.3506f097104859b533c81bf3@linux-foundation.org> <20180716133028.GQ17280@dhcp22.suse.cz> <20180716140440.fd3sjw5xys5wozw7@black.fi.intel.com> <20180716142245.GT17280@dhcp22.suse.cz> <20180716144739.que5362bofty6ocp@kshutemo-mobl1> <20180716174042.GA17280@dhcp22.suse.cz> <20180716203846.roolhtesloabxr2g@kshutemo-mobl1> <20180717090053.GE16803@dhcp22.suse.cz> <20180717093030.cu2jyuw5kuw7nvwo@black.fi.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20180717093030.cu2jyuw5kuw7nvwo@black.fi.intel.com> Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: "Kirill A. Shutemov" Cc: "Kirill A. Shutemov" , Andrew Morton , Dmitry Vyukov , Oleg Nesterov , Andrea Arcangeli , linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org On Tue 17-07-18 12:30:30, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote: [...] > You propose quite a big redesign on how we handle anonymous VMAs. > Feel free to propose the patch(set). But I don't think it would fly for > stable@. OK, fair enough. I thought this would be much easier in the end but I admit I haven't tried that so I might have underestimated the whole thing. -- Michal Hocko SUSE Labs