Re: [PATCH] hexagon: switch to NO_BOOTMEM

[Richard Kuo <rkuo@codeaurora.org>]

On Tue, Jul 24, 2018 at 08:47:04AM +0300, Mike Rapoport wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 23, 2018 at 04:23:39PM -0500, Richard Kuo wrote:
> > 
> > On Mon, Jul 16, 2018 at 10:43:18AM +0300, Mike Rapoport wrote:
> > > This patch adds registration of the system memory with memblock, eliminates
> > > bootmem initialization and converts early memory reservations from bootmem
> > > to memblock.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> > 
> > Sorry for the delay, and thanks for this patch.
> > 
> > I think the first memblock_reserve should use ARCH_PFN_OFFSET instead of
> > PHYS_OFFSET.
> 
> memblock_reserve gets physical address rather than a pfn.
> 
> If I read arch/hexagon/include/asm/mem-layout.h correctly, the PHYS_OFFSET
> *is* the physical address of the RAM and ARCH_PFN_OFFSET is the first pfn:
> 
> #define PHYS_PFN_OFFSET	(PHYS_OFFSET >> PAGE_SHIFT)
> #define ARCH_PFN_OFFSET	PHYS_PFN_OFFSET
> 
> Did I miss something?

Sorry, I should have been more clear.  In the size calculation, it's
subtracting the unshifted PHYS_OFFSET from the start page number, which
I'm pretty sure is wrong.


Thanks,
Richard Kuo


-- 
Employee of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum, 
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project