From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-ed1-f70.google.com (mail-ed1-f70.google.com [209.85.208.70]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3CBD06B000A for ; Thu, 9 Aug 2018 08:34:54 -0400 (EDT) Received: by mail-ed1-f70.google.com with SMTP id i26-v6so2066231edr.4 for ; Thu, 09 Aug 2018 05:34:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com. [148.163.158.5]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id u42-v6si1759770edm.404.2018.08.09.05.34.52 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 09 Aug 2018 05:34:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pps.filterd (m0098420.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.22/8.16.0.22) with SMTP id w79CTfAC091421 for ; Thu, 9 Aug 2018 08:34:51 -0400 Received: from e06smtp04.uk.ibm.com (e06smtp04.uk.ibm.com [195.75.94.100]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2krmqujn57-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Thu, 09 Aug 2018 08:34:51 -0400 Received: from localhost by e06smtp04.uk.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Thu, 9 Aug 2018 13:34:49 +0100 Date: Thu, 9 Aug 2018 15:34:42 +0300 From: Mike Rapoport Subject: Re: [PATCH] mips: switch to NO_BOOTMEM References: <1531727262-11520-1-git-send-email-rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20180726070355.GD8477@rapoport-lnx> <20180726172005.pgjmkvwz2lpflpor@pburton-laptop> <20180802115550.GA10232@rapoport-lnx> <20180808214215.bf6hyurv3nunfynd@pburton-laptop> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20180808214215.bf6hyurv3nunfynd@pburton-laptop> Message-Id: <20180809123441.GA3264@rapoport-lnx> Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: Paul Burton Cc: Fancer's opinion , Linux-MIPS , Ralf Baechle , James Hogan , Huacai Chen , Michal Hocko , linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel On Wed, Aug 08, 2018 at 02:42:15PM -0700, Paul Burton wrote: > Hi Sergey & Mike, > > On Thu, Aug 09, 2018 at 12:30:03AM +0300, Fancer's opinion wrote: > > Hello Mike, > > I haven't read your patch text yet. I am waiting for the subsystem > > maintainers response at least > > about the necessity to have this type of changes being merged into the > > sources (I mean > > memblock/no-bootmem alteration). If they find it pointless (although I > > would strongly disagree), then > > nothing to discuss. Otherwise we can come up with a solution. > > > > -Sergey > > I'm all for dropping bootmem. > > It's too late for something this invasive in 4.19, but I'd love to get > it into 4.20. I can resend my patch once merge window is closed. We can then apply additional changes Sergey has done in his set on top. > Thanks, > Paul > -- Sincerely yours, Mike.