linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@techadventures.net>
To: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	tglx@linutronix.de, joe@perches.com, arnd@arndb.de,
	gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: Fix comment for NODEMASK_ALLOC
Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2018 14:30:24 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180821123024.GA9489@techadventures.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180821121734.GA29735@dhcp22.suse.cz>

On Tue, Aug 21, 2018 at 02:17:34PM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
> We do have CONFIG_NODES_SHIFT=10 in our SLES kernels for quite some
> time (around SLE11-SP3 AFAICS).
> 
> Anyway, isn't NODES_ALLOC over engineered a bit? Does actually even do
> larger than 1024 NUMA nodes? This would be 128B and from a quick glance
> it seems that none of those functions are called in deep stacks. I
> haven't gone through all of them but a patch which checks them all and
> removes NODES_ALLOC would be quite nice IMHO.

No, maximum we can get is 1024 NUMA nodes.
I checked this when writing another patch [1], and since having gone
through all archs Kconfigs, CONFIG_NODES_SHIFT=10 is the limit.

NODEMASK_ALLOC gets only called from:

- unregister_mem_sect_under_nodes() (not anymore after [1])
- __nr_hugepages_store_common (This does not seem to have a deep stack, we could use a normal nodemask_t)

But is also used for NODEMASK_SCRATCH (mainly used for mempolicy):

struct nodemask_scratch {
	nodemask_t	mask1;
	nodemask_t	mask2;
};

that would make 256 bytes in case CONFIG_NODES_SHIFT=10.
I am not familiar with mempolicy code, I am not sure if we can do without that and
figure out another way to achieve the same.

[1] https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10566673/#22179663 

-- 
Oscar Salvador
SUSE L3

  reply	other threads:[~2018-08-21 12:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-08-20  8:55 [PATCH] mm: Fix comment for NODEMASK_ALLOC Oscar Salvador
2018-08-20 21:24 ` Andrew Morton
2018-08-21 12:17   ` Michal Hocko
2018-08-21 12:30     ` Oscar Salvador [this message]
2018-08-21 12:51       ` Michal Hocko
2018-08-21 12:58         ` Oscar Salvador
2018-08-21 20:51       ` Andrew Morton
2018-08-23 10:51         ` Oscar Salvador

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180821123024.GA9489@techadventures.net \
    --to=osalvador@techadventures.net \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=joe@perches.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
    --cc=osalvador@suse.de \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).