From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-qt0-f198.google.com (mail-qt0-f198.google.com [209.85.216.198]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF5896B5920 for ; Fri, 31 Aug 2018 17:49:33 -0400 (EDT) Received: by mail-qt0-f198.google.com with SMTP id v52-v6so16213551qtc.3 for ; Fri, 31 Aug 2018 14:49:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mx1.redhat.com (mx1.redhat.com. [209.132.183.28]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id h14-v6si9910258qka.90.2018.08.31.14.49.32 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 31 Aug 2018 14:49:32 -0700 (PDT) From: Andrea Arcangeli Subject: [PATCH 1/1] userfaultfd: allow get_mempolicy(MPOL_F_NODE|MPOL_F_ADDR) to trigger userfaults Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2018 17:48:48 -0400 Message-Id: <20180831214848.23676-1-aarcange@redhat.com> Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: Andrew Morton Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, Maxime Coquelin , "Dr. David Alan Gilbert" , Mike Rapoport get_mempolicy(MPOL_F_NODE|MPOL_F_ADDR) called a get_user_pages that would not be waiting for userfaults before failing and it would hit on a SIGBUS instead. Using get_user_pages_locked/unlocked instead will allow get_mempolicy to allow userfaults to resolve the fault and fill the hole, before grabbing the node id of the page. Reported-by: Maxime Coquelin Tested-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert Signed-off-by: Andrea Arcangeli --- mm/mempolicy.c | 24 +++++++++++++++++++----- 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/mm/mempolicy.c b/mm/mempolicy.c index 01f1a14facc4..a7f7f5415936 100644 --- a/mm/mempolicy.c +++ b/mm/mempolicy.c @@ -797,16 +797,19 @@ static void get_policy_nodemask(struct mempolicy *p, nodemask_t *nodes) } } -static int lookup_node(unsigned long addr) +static int lookup_node(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long addr) { struct page *p; int err; - err = get_user_pages(addr & PAGE_MASK, 1, 0, &p, NULL); + int locked = 1; + err = get_user_pages_locked(addr & PAGE_MASK, 1, 0, &p, &locked); if (err >= 0) { err = page_to_nid(p); put_page(p); } + if (locked) + up_read(&mm->mmap_sem); return err; } @@ -817,7 +820,7 @@ static long do_get_mempolicy(int *policy, nodemask_t *nmask, int err; struct mm_struct *mm = current->mm; struct vm_area_struct *vma = NULL; - struct mempolicy *pol = current->mempolicy; + struct mempolicy *pol = current->mempolicy, *pol_refcount = NULL; if (flags & ~(unsigned long)(MPOL_F_NODE|MPOL_F_ADDR|MPOL_F_MEMS_ALLOWED)) @@ -857,7 +860,16 @@ static long do_get_mempolicy(int *policy, nodemask_t *nmask, if (flags & MPOL_F_NODE) { if (flags & MPOL_F_ADDR) { - err = lookup_node(addr); + /* + * Take a refcount on the mpol, lookup_node() + * wil drop the mmap_sem, so after calling + * lookup_node() only "pol" remains valid, "vma" + * is stale. + */ + pol_refcount = pol; + vma = NULL; + mpol_get(pol); + err = lookup_node(mm, addr); if (err < 0) goto out; *policy = err; @@ -892,7 +904,9 @@ static long do_get_mempolicy(int *policy, nodemask_t *nmask, out: mpol_cond_put(pol); if (vma) - up_read(¤t->mm->mmap_sem); + up_read(&mm->mmap_sem); + if (pol_refcount) + mpol_put(pol_refcount); return err; }