From: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
To: Ley Foon Tan <ley.foon.tan@intel.com>
Cc: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>,
nios2-dev@lists.rocketboards.org, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 01/11] nios2: update_mmu_cache clear the old entry from the TLB
Date: Sat, 29 Sep 2018 11:37:12 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180929113712.6dcfeeb3@roar.ozlabs.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180923150830.6096-2-npiggin@gmail.com>
Hi,
Did you get a chance to look at these?
This first patch 1/11 solves the lockup problem that Guenter reported
with my changes to core mm code. So I plan to resubmit my patches
to Andrew's -mm tree with this patch to avoid nios2 breakage.
Thanks,
Nick
On Mon, 24 Sep 2018 01:08:20 +1000
Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> wrote:
> Fault paths like do_read_fault will install a Linux pte with the young
> bit clear. The CPU will fault again because the TLB has not been
> updated, this time a valid pte exists so handle_pte_fault will just
> set the young bit with ptep_set_access_flags, which flushes the TLB.
>
> The TLB is flushed so the next attempt will go to the fast TLB handler
> which loads the TLB with the new Linux pte. The access then proceeds.
>
> This design is fragile to depend on the young bit being clear after
> the initial Linux fault. A proposed core mm change to immediately set
> the young bit upon such a fault, results in ptep_set_access_flags not
> flushing the TLB because it finds no change to the pte. The spurious
> fault fix path only flushes the TLB if the access was a store. If it
> was a load, then this results in an infinite loop of page faults.
>
> This change adds a TLB flush in update_mmu_cache, which removes that
> TLB entry upon the first fault. This will cause the fast TLB handler
> to load the new pte and avoid the Linux page fault entirely.
>
> Signed-off-by: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
> ---
> arch/nios2/mm/cacheflush.c | 2 ++
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/nios2/mm/cacheflush.c b/arch/nios2/mm/cacheflush.c
> index 506f6e1c86d5..d58e7e80dc0d 100644
> --- a/arch/nios2/mm/cacheflush.c
> +++ b/arch/nios2/mm/cacheflush.c
> @@ -204,6 +204,8 @@ void update_mmu_cache(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
> struct page *page;
> struct address_space *mapping;
>
> + flush_tlb_page(vma, address);
> +
> if (!pfn_valid(pfn))
> return;
>
> --
> 2.18.0
>
next parent reply other threads:[~2018-09-29 1:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20180923150830.6096-1-npiggin@gmail.com>
[not found] ` <20180923150830.6096-2-npiggin@gmail.com>
2018-09-29 1:37 ` Nicholas Piggin [this message]
2018-10-01 15:24 ` [RFC PATCH 01/11] nios2: update_mmu_cache clear the old entry from the TLB Ley Foon Tan
2018-10-02 0:06 ` Nicholas Piggin
2018-10-03 3:52 ` Nicholas Piggin
2018-10-05 1:52 ` Ley Foon Tan
2018-10-08 7:16 ` Nicholas Piggin
2018-10-08 17:02 ` Ley Foon Tan
2018-10-08 9:21 ` Nicholas Piggin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180929113712.6dcfeeb3@roar.ozlabs.ibm.com \
--to=npiggin@gmail.com \
--cc=ley.foon.tan@intel.com \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux@roeck-us.net \
--cc=nios2-dev@lists.rocketboards.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).