linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Linux-MM <linux-mm@kvack.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm,numa: Remove remaining traces of rate-limiting.
Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2018 18:01:49 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181008170149.GB5819@techsingularity.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1538824999-31230-1-git-send-email-srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

On Sat, Oct 06, 2018 at 04:53:19PM +0530, Srikar Dronamraju wrote:
> With Commit efaffc5e40ae ("mm, sched/numa: Remove rate-limiting of automatic
> NUMA balancing migration"), we no more require migrate lock and its
> initialization. Its redundant. Hence remove it.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

Hi Ingo, 

Can this be sent with the rest of the patches that got merged for 4.19-rc7
so they are more or less together? It's functionally harmless to delay
until the 4.20 merge window but it's a bit untidy. The mistake was mine
switching between a backport and mainline versions of the original patch.

Thanks

-- 
Mel Gorman
SUSE Labs

  parent reply	other threads:[~2018-10-08 17:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-10-06 11:23 [PATCH] mm,numa: Remove remaining traces of rate-limiting Srikar Dronamraju
2018-10-06 13:23 ` Mel Gorman
2018-10-08 17:01 ` Mel Gorman [this message]
2018-10-09  6:31   ` Ingo Molnar
2018-10-09  7:01 ` [tip:sched/urgent] mm, sched/numa: Remove remaining traces of NUMA rate-limiting tip-bot for Srikar Dronamraju

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20181008170149.GB5819@techsingularity.net \
    --to=mgorman@techsingularity.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=riel@surriel.com \
    --cc=srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).