From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-ed1-f69.google.com (mail-ed1-f69.google.com [209.85.208.69]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F6ED6B000C for ; Tue, 9 Oct 2018 04:02:56 -0400 (EDT) Received: by mail-ed1-f69.google.com with SMTP id w42-v6so780616edd.0 for ; Tue, 09 Oct 2018 01:02:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mx1.suse.de (mx2.suse.de. [195.135.220.15]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id g44-v6si6190724eda.217.2018.10.09.01.02.54 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 09 Oct 2018 01:02:54 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 9 Oct 2018 10:02:53 +0200 From: Michal Hocko Subject: Re: Re: [PATCH] mm, oom_adj: avoid meaningless loop to find processes sharing mm Message-ID: <20181009080253.GD8528@dhcp22.suse.cz> References: <67eedc4c-7afa-e845-6c88-9716fd820de6@i-love.sakura.ne.jp> <20181008011931epcms1p82dd01b7e5c067ea99946418bc97de46a@epcms1p8> <20181008061407epcms1p519703ae6373a770160c8f912c7aa9521@epcms1p5> <20181008083855epcms1p20e691e5a001f3b94b267997c24e91128@epcms1p2> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20181008083855epcms1p20e691e5a001f3b94b267997c24e91128@epcms1p2> Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: Yong-Taek Lee Cc: Tetsuo Handa , "linux-mm@kvack.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" On Mon 08-10-18 17:38:55, Yong-Taek Lee wrote: > Do you have any other idea to avoid meaningless loop ? I have already asked in the earlier posting but let's follow up here. Could you please expand on why this actually matters and what are the consequences please? -- Michal Hocko SUSE Labs